Back to list
levnikolaevich

ln-633-test-value-auditor

by levnikolaevich

Greate Claude Code skills collection. Production-ready skills that cover the full delivery workflow — from research and discovery to epic planning, task breakdown, implementation, testing, code review, and quality gates.

52🍴 12📅 Jan 23, 2026

SKILL.md


name: ln-633-test-value-auditor description: Risk-Based Value audit worker (L3). Calculates Usefulness Score = Impact (1-5) × Probability (1-5) for each test. Returns KEEP/REVIEW/REMOVE decisions based on thresholds (≥15 KEEP, 10-14 REVIEW, <10 REMOVE). allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash

Risk-Based Value Auditor (L3 Worker)

Specialized worker calculating Usefulness Score for each test.

Purpose & Scope

  • Worker in ln-630 coordinator pipeline
  • Audit Risk-Based Value (Category 3: Critical Priority)
  • Calculate Usefulness Score = Impact × Probability
  • Make KEEP/REVIEW/REMOVE decisions
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10)

Inputs (from Coordinator)

Receives contextStore with Impact/Probability matrices, test file list.

Workflow

  1. Parse context
  2. For each test: calculate Usefulness Score
  3. Classify: KEEP (≥15), REVIEW (10-14), REMOVE (<10)
  4. Collect findings
  5. Calculate score
  6. Return JSON

Usefulness Score Calculation

Formula

Usefulness Score = Business Impact (1-5) × Failure Probability (1-5)

Impact Scoring (1-5)

ScoreImpactExamples
5CriticalMoney loss, security breach, data corruption
4HighCore flow breaks (checkout, login, registration)
3MediumFeature partially broken, degraded UX
2LowMinor UX issue, cosmetic bug
1TrivialCosmetic issue, no user impact

Probability Scoring (1-5)

ScoreProbabilityIndicators
5Very HighComplex algorithm, new technology, many dependencies
4HighMultiple dependencies, concurrency, edge cases
3MediumStandard CRUD, framework defaults, established patterns
2LowSimple logic, well-established library, trivial operation
1Very LowTrivial assignment, framework-generated, impossible to break

Decision Thresholds

Score RangeDecisionAction
≥15KEEPTest is valuable, maintain it
10-14REVIEWConsider if E2E already covers this
<10REMOVEDelete test, not worth maintenance cost

Scoring Examples

Example 1: Payment Processing Test

Test: "processPayment calculates discount correctly"
Impact: 5 (Critical — money calculation)
Probability: 4 (High — complex algorithm, multiple payment gateways)
Usefulness Score = 5 × 4 = 20
Decision: KEEP

Example 2: Email Validation Test

Test: "validateEmail returns true for valid email"
Impact: 2 (Low — minor UX issue if broken)
Probability: 2 (Low — simple regex, well-tested library)
Usefulness Score = 2 × 2 = 4
Decision: REMOVE (likely already covered by E2E registration test)

Example 3: Login Flow Test

Test: "login with valid credentials returns JWT"
Impact: 4 (High — core flow)
Probability: 3 (Medium — standard auth flow)
Usefulness Score = 4 × 3 = 12
Decision: REVIEW (if E2E covers, remove; else keep)

Audit Rules

1. Calculate Score for Each Test

Process:

  • Read test file, extract test name/description
  • Analyze code under test (CUT)
  • Determine Impact (1-5)
  • Determine Probability (1-5)
  • Calculate Usefulness Score

2. Classify Decisions

KEEP (≥15):

  • High-value tests (money, security, data integrity)
  • Core flows (checkout, login)
  • Complex algorithms

REVIEW (10-14):

  • Medium-value tests
  • Question: "Is this already covered by E2E?"
  • If yes → REMOVE; if no → KEEP

REMOVE (<10):

  • Low-value tests (cosmetic, trivial)
  • Framework/library tests
  • Duplicates of E2E tests

3. Identify Patterns

Common low-value tests (<10):

  • Testing framework behavior
  • Testing trivial getters/setters
  • Testing constant values
  • Testing type annotations

Scoring Algorithm (for compliance)

total_tests = KEEP + REVIEW + REMOVE
remove_percentage = (REMOVE / total_tests) * 100
score = 10 - (remove_percentage / 10)  // penalize for wasteful tests
score = max(0, min(10, score))

Output Format

{
  "category": "Risk-Based Value",
  "score": 7,
  "total_tests": 65,
  "keep_count": 35,
  "review_count": 15,
  "remove_count": 15,
  "findings": [
    {
      "test_file": "payment.test.ts",
      "test_name": "processPayment calculates discount correctly",
      "location": "payment.test.ts:45-68",
      "impact": 5,
      "probability": 4,
      "usefulness_score": 20,
      "decision": "KEEP",
      "reason": "Critical money calculation, complex algorithm"
    },
    {
      "test_file": "utils.test.ts",
      "test_name": "validateEmail returns true for valid email",
      "location": "utils.test.ts:23-27",
      "impact": 2,
      "probability": 2,
      "usefulness_score": 4,
      "decision": "REMOVE",
      "reason": "Low value, likely covered by E2E registration test",
      "effort": "S"
    },
    {
      "test_file": "auth.test.ts",
      "test_name": "login with valid credentials returns JWT",
      "location": "auth.test.ts:12-25",
      "impact": 4,
      "probability": 3,
      "usefulness_score": 12,
      "decision": "REVIEW",
      "question": "Is this already covered by E2E login test?",
      "effort": "S"
    }
  ]
}

Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23

Score

Total Score

80/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

1ヶ月以内に更新

+10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

+5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon