Back to list
jeremylongshore

perplexity-known-pitfalls

by jeremylongshore

Hundreds of Claude Code plugins with embedded AI skills. Learn via interactive Jupyter tutorials.

1,042🍴 135📅 Jan 23, 2026

SKILL.md


name: perplexity-known-pitfalls description: | Identify and avoid Perplexity anti-patterns and common integration mistakes. Use when reviewing Perplexity code for issues, onboarding new developers, or auditing existing Perplexity integrations for best practices violations. Trigger with phrases like "perplexity mistakes", "perplexity anti-patterns", "perplexity pitfalls", "perplexity what not to do", "perplexity code review". allowed-tools: Read, Grep version: 1.0.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io

Perplexity Known Pitfalls

Overview

Common mistakes and anti-patterns when integrating with Perplexity.

Prerequisites

  • Access to Perplexity codebase for review
  • Understanding of async/await patterns
  • Knowledge of security best practices
  • Familiarity with rate limiting concepts

Pitfall #1: Synchronous API Calls in Request Path

❌ Anti-Pattern

// User waits for Perplexity API call
app.post('/checkout', async (req, res) => {
  const payment = await perplexityClient.processPayment(req.body);  // 2-5s latency
  const notification = await perplexityClient.sendEmail(payment);   // Another 1-2s
  res.json({ success: true });  // User waited 3-7s
});

✅ Better Approach

// Return immediately, process async
app.post('/checkout', async (req, res) => {
  const jobId = await queue.enqueue('process-checkout', req.body);
  res.json({ jobId, status: 'processing' });  // 50ms response
});

// Background job
async function processCheckout(data) {
  const payment = await perplexityClient.processPayment(data);
  await perplexityClient.sendEmail(payment);
}

Pitfall #2: Not Handling Rate Limits

❌ Anti-Pattern

// Blast requests, crash on 429
for (const item of items) {
  await perplexityClient.process(item);  // Will hit rate limit
}

✅ Better Approach

import pLimit from 'p-limit';

const limit = pLimit(5);  // Max 5 concurrent
const rateLimiter = new RateLimiter({ tokensPerSecond: 10 });

for (const item of items) {
  await rateLimiter.acquire();
  await limit(() => perplexityClient.process(item));
}

Pitfall #3: Leaking API Keys

❌ Anti-Pattern

// In frontend code (visible to users!)
const client = new PerplexityClient({
  apiKey: 'sk_live_ACTUAL_KEY_HERE',  // Anyone can see this
});

// In git history
git commit -m "add API key"  // Exposed forever

✅ Better Approach

// Backend only, environment variable
const client = new PerplexityClient({
  apiKey: process.env.PERPLEXITY_API_KEY,
});

// Use .gitignore
.env
.env.local
.env.*.local

Pitfall #4: Ignoring Idempotency

❌ Anti-Pattern

// Network error on response = duplicate charge!
try {
  await perplexityClient.charge(order);
} catch (error) {
  if (error.code === 'NETWORK_ERROR') {
    await perplexityClient.charge(order);  // Charged twice!
  }
}

✅ Better Approach

const idempotencyKey = `order-${order.id}-${Date.now()}`;

await perplexityClient.charge(order, {
  idempotencyKey,  // Safe to retry
});

Pitfall #5: Not Validating Webhooks

❌ Anti-Pattern

// Trust any incoming request
app.post('/webhook', (req, res) => {
  processWebhook(req.body);  // Attacker can send fake events
  res.sendStatus(200);
});

✅ Better Approach

app.post('/webhook',
  express.raw({ type: 'application/json' }),
  (req, res) => {
    const signature = req.headers['x-perplexity-signature'];
    if (!verifyPerplexitySignature(req.body, signature)) {
      return res.sendStatus(401);
    }
    processWebhook(JSON.parse(req.body));
    res.sendStatus(200);
  }
);

Pitfall #6: Missing Error Handling

❌ Anti-Pattern

// Crashes on any error
const result = await perplexityClient.get(id);
console.log(result.data.nested.value);  // TypeError if missing

✅ Better Approach

try {
  const result = await perplexityClient.get(id);
  console.log(result?.data?.nested?.value ?? 'default');
} catch (error) {
  if (error instanceof PerplexityNotFoundError) {
    return null;
  }
  if (error instanceof PerplexityRateLimitError) {
    await sleep(error.retryAfter);
    return this.get(id);  // Retry
  }
  throw error;  // Rethrow unknown errors
}

Pitfall #7: Hardcoding Configuration

❌ Anti-Pattern

const client = new PerplexityClient({
  timeout: 5000,  // Too short for some operations
  baseUrl: 'https://api.perplexity.com',  // Can't change for staging
});

✅ Better Approach

const client = new PerplexityClient({
  timeout: parseInt(process.env.PERPLEXITY_TIMEOUT || '30000'),
  baseUrl: process.env.PERPLEXITY_BASE_URL || 'https://api.perplexity.com',
});

Pitfall #8: Not Implementing Circuit Breaker

❌ Anti-Pattern

// When Perplexity is down, every request hangs
for (const user of users) {
  await perplexityClient.sync(user);  // All timeout sequentially
}

✅ Better Approach

import CircuitBreaker from 'opossum';

const breaker = new CircuitBreaker(perplexityClient.sync, {
  timeout: 10000,
  errorThresholdPercentage: 50,
  resetTimeout: 30000,
});

// Fails fast when circuit is open
for (const user of users) {
  await breaker.fire(user).catch(handleFailure);
}

Pitfall #9: Logging Sensitive Data

❌ Anti-Pattern

console.log('Request:', JSON.stringify(request));  // Logs API key, PII
console.log('User:', user);  // Logs email, phone

✅ Better Approach

const redacted = {
  ...request,
  apiKey: '[REDACTED]',
  user: { id: user.id },  // Only non-sensitive fields
};
console.log('Request:', JSON.stringify(redacted));

Pitfall #10: No Graceful Degradation

❌ Anti-Pattern

// Entire feature broken if Perplexity is down
const recommendations = await perplexityClient.getRecommendations(userId);
return renderPage({ recommendations });  // Page crashes

✅ Better Approach

let recommendations;
try {
  recommendations = await perplexityClient.getRecommendations(userId);
} catch (error) {
  recommendations = await getFallbackRecommendations(userId);
  reportDegradedService('perplexity', error);
}
return renderPage({ recommendations, degraded: !recommendations });

Instructions

Step 1: Review for Anti-Patterns

Scan codebase for each pitfall pattern.

Step 2: Prioritize Fixes

Address security issues first, then performance.

Step 3: Implement Better Approach

Replace anti-patterns with recommended patterns.

Step 4: Add Prevention

Set up linting and CI checks to prevent recurrence.

Output

  • Anti-patterns identified
  • Fixes prioritized and implemented
  • Prevention measures in place
  • Code quality improved

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
Too many findingsLegacy codebasePrioritize security first
Pattern not detectedComplex codeManual review
False positiveSimilar codeWhitelist exceptions
Fix breaks testsBehavior changeUpdate tests

Examples

Quick Pitfall Scan

# Check for common pitfalls
grep -r "sk_live_" --include="*.ts" src/        # Key leakage
grep -r "console.log" --include="*.ts" src/     # Potential PII logging

Resources

Quick Reference Card

PitfallDetectionPrevention
Sync in requestHigh latencyUse queues
Rate limit ignore429 errorsImplement backoff
Key leakageGit history scanEnv vars, .gitignore
No idempotencyDuplicate recordsIdempotency keys
Unverified webhooksSecurity auditSignature verification
Missing error handlingCrashesTry-catch, types
Hardcoded configCode reviewEnvironment variables
No circuit breakerCascading failuresopossum, resilience4j
Logging PIILog auditRedaction middleware
No degradationTotal outagesFallback systems

Score

Total Score

85/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 1000以上

+15
最近の活動

1ヶ月以内に更新

+10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

+5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon