
executing-plans
by HankLiu447
SuperSpec - Unified spec-driven development framework combining TDD discipline with structured documentation
SKILL.md
name: executing-plans description: | Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints. Alternative to subagent-driven development for batch execution.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
Core principle: Batch execution with checkpoints for user review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
When to Use
Have implementation plan?
↓ yes
Want batch execution with checkpoints?
↓ yes
Separate session (not subagent-driven)?
↓ yes
→ Use executing-plans
vs. Subagent-Driven Development:
- Batch execution (multiple tasks at once)
- User review between batches
- Better for sequential tasks with dependencies
- User stays in loop at checkpoints
The Process
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Executing Plans Flow │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Step 1: Load and Review Plan │
│ └─→ Read plan, identify questions, raise concerns │
│ │
│ Step 2: Execute Batch (default: 3 tasks) │
│ └─→ Follow TDD for each task │
│ └─→ Mark as in_progress → completed │
│ │
│ Step 3: Report │
│ └─→ Show what was implemented │
│ └─→ Show verification output │
│ └─→ "Ready for feedback" │
│ │
│ Step 4: Continue │
│ └─→ Apply feedback if needed │
│ └─→ Execute next batch │
│ │
│ Step 5: Complete Development │
│ └─→ Use superspec:finish-branch │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
1. Read plan file: superspec/changes/[id]/plan.md
2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns
3. If concerns: Raise them with user before starting
4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Questions to ask yourself:
- Do I understand all tasks?
- Are there any ambiguous requirements?
- Do I have all the context I need?
- Are there any risks or concerns?
Step 2: Execute Batch
Default: First 3 tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress in TodoWrite
- Follow TDD strictly:
- Write failing test
- Run test, verify fails
- Implement minimal code
- Run test, verify passes
- Commit with Spec reference
- Mark as completed
- Update tasks.md with completion
TDD is mandatory for each task. No exceptions.
Step 3: Report
When batch complete, report:
## Batch 1 Complete (Tasks 1-3)
### Task 1: [Name]
- Implemented: [what]
- Tests: [X/Y pass]
- Commit: [sha]
### Task 2: [Name]
- Implemented: [what]
- Tests: [X/Y pass]
- Commit: [sha]
### Task 3: [Name]
- Implemented: [what]
- Tests: [X/Y pass]
- Commit: [sha]
### Verification
$ npm test All tests pass (X/Y)
Ready for feedback.
Wait for user feedback before continuing.
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finish-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED: Use
superspec:finish-branch - Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker mid-batch (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
- TDD cycle isn't working (test won't fail/pass as expected)
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- User updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Batch Size Guidelines
| Situation | Batch Size |
|---|---|
| Normal tasks | 3 tasks |
| Complex tasks | 1-2 tasks |
| Simple tasks | 4-5 tasks |
| User requests | As specified |
Adjust based on:
- Task complexity
- User preference
- How closely user wants to monitor
SuperSpec Integration
TDD for Each Task
Every task in the batch must follow TDD:
For each task:
1. Write test based on Scenario
2. Run test → MUST FAIL
3. Implement minimal code
4. Run test → MUST PASS
5. Commit with Spec reference
Update Documents
After each batch:
- Update
tasks.mdwith completed tasks - Update status counts (top section)
- Update Completion Tracking table (bottom section)
- Mark phases complete when done
Completion Tracking table example:
## Completion Tracking
| Phase | Tasks | Completed | Status |
|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
| Phase 1 | 3 | 2 | IN_PROGRESS |
| Phase 2 | 6 | 0 | PENDING |
| **Total** | **9** | **2** | **22%** |
Spec References in Commits
git commit -m "feat([capability]): [description]
Refs: superspec/changes/[id]/specs/[cap]/spec.md
Requirement: [Name]
Scenario: [Name]"
Red Flags
Never:
- Skip TDD for "simple" tasks
- Continue without user feedback at checkpoints
- Ignore blockers and push through
- Skip verification before reporting
- Guess when unsure
- Skip Completion Tracking table updates
Always:
- Review plan critically first
- Follow TDD for every task
- Report at batch completion
- Update Completion Tracking table after each batch
- Wait for feedback
- Stop when blocked
Quick Reference
| Step | Action | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Load | Read plan, raise concerns | Questions or proceed |
| 2. Execute | TDD for each task in batch | Implemented code |
| 3. Report | Show results, verification | Batch summary |
| 4. Continue | Apply feedback, next batch | Continue or adjust |
| 5. Complete | Use finish-branch skill | Merge/PR/Keep |
Integration
Called by:
- Plan header directive
- User choosing "Parallel Session" execution
Pairs with:
superspec:plan- Creates the plan this executessuperspec:finish-branch- Completes developmenttdd- Implementation method for each taskverification-before-completion- Before claiming batch complete
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Follow TDD for EVERY task
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Between batches: just report and wait
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon


