Back to list
troykelly

acceptance-criteria-verification

by troykelly

Opinionated GitHub-native development workflow with 28 skills for autonomous, issue-driven software development with Claude Code

5🍴 0📅 Jan 16, 2026

SKILL.md


name: acceptance-criteria-verification description: Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue allowed-tools:

  • Bash
  • Read
  • mcp__github__* model: opus

Acceptance Criteria Verification

Overview

Systematically verify each acceptance criterion and post structured reports.

Core principle: Every criterion verified. Every verification documented.

Announce at start: "I'm using acceptance-criteria-verification to verify the implementation."

The Verification Process

Step 1: Extract Criteria

Read the issue and extract all acceptance criteria:

# Get issue body
gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body'

Parse out criteria (look for - [ ] or - [x] patterns in acceptance criteria section).

Step 2: Plan Verification

For each criterion, determine:

CriterionTest TypeHow to Verify
[Criterion 1]Unit testRun specific test
[Criterion 2]IntegrationAPI call + response check
[Criterion 3]E2EBrowser automation
[Criterion 4]ManualVisual inspection

Step 3: Execute Verification

For each criterion, run the appropriate verification:

Unit/Integration Tests

# Run specific tests
pnpm test --grep "[test pattern]"

# Or run test file
pnpm test path/to/specific.test.ts

E2E Tests

# If using Playwright
npx playwright test [test file]

# If using browser automation MCP
# Use mcp__playwright or mcp__puppeteer

Manual Verification

For criteria requiring visual or interactive verification:

  1. Start the application
  2. Navigate to relevant area
  3. Perform the action
  4. Capture screenshot if relevant
  5. Document result

Step 4: Record Results

For each criterion, record:

Criterion: [Text from issue]
Status: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL | SKIP
Evidence: [Test output, screenshot, observation]
Notes: [Any relevant details]

Step 5: Post Verification Report

Post a structured comment to the issue:

gh issue comment [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "## Verification Report

**Run**: $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)
**By**: agent
**Commit**: $(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
**Branch**: $(git branch --show-current)

### Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Notes |
|---|-----------|--------|-------|
| 1 | [Criterion text] | PASS | [Notes] |
| 2 | [Criterion text] | FAIL | [What failed] |
| 3 | [Criterion text] | PARTIAL | [What works, what doesn't] |

### Summary

| Status | Count |
|--------|-------|
| PASS | X |
| FAIL | X |
| PARTIAL | X |
| SKIP | X |
| **Total** | **X** |

### Test Output

<details>
<summary>Test Results</summary>

\`\`\`
[test output here]
\`\`\`

</details>

### Next Steps

- [ ] [Action items for failures/partials]
"

Step 6: Update Issue Checkboxes

For each passing criterion, check it off in the issue body:

# Get current body
BODY=$(gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body')

# Update checkboxes for passing criteria
# (Implementation depends on body format)

# Update issue
gh issue edit [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "$NEW_BODY"

Step 7: Update Project Fields

# Update project fields using project-status-sync skill

# Verification status
# - All PASS → Passing
# - Any FAIL → Failing
# - Mix of PASS/PARTIAL → Partial

# Criteria Met count
# - Count of PASS criteria

# Last Verified
# - Current date

# Verified By
# - "agent"

Status Definitions

StatusMeaningAction
PASSCriterion fully met, verified workingCheck off in issue
FAILCriterion not met, requires fixDocument what failed, return to development
PARTIALWorks with issues, needs improvementDocument issues, may need fix
SKIPCould not verify (blocked, N/A, etc.)Document reason

E2E Verification Best Practices

When using browser automation:

  1. Start fresh - New browser session for each verification
  2. Capture evidence - Screenshots at key points
  3. Check visible state - Not just DOM, but visible rendering
  4. Test error cases - Not just happy path
  5. Clean up - Close sessions after verification
// Example verification flow (pseudo-code)
await page.goto(appUrl);
await page.click('[data-testid="new-chat"]');
await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="chat-input"]');
await page.screenshot({ path: 'new-chat-verification.png' });
// Verify expected state
const title = await page.title();
expect(title).toContain('New Chat');

Handling Failures

When criteria fail:

  1. Document specifically what failed
  2. Include reproduction steps if not obvious
  3. Capture error messages or screenshots
  4. Return to development to fix
  5. Re-run verification after fix

Do NOT:

  • Mark as PASS when it failed
  • Skip verification because "it should work"
  • Ignore intermittent failures

Verification Checklist

Before completing verification:

  • All acceptance criteria evaluated
  • Each criterion has clear PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL/SKIP status
  • Evidence captured for each (test output, screenshots)
  • Verification report posted to issue
  • Issue checkboxes updated for passing criteria
  • Project fields updated
  • If any failures, next steps documented

After Verification

Based on results:

Overall ResultNext Action
All PASSProceed to code review
Any FAILReturn to development, fix, re-verify
Partial onlyDiscuss with user - acceptable or needs fix?

Integration

This skill is called by:

  • issue-driven-development - Step 8

This skill calls:

  • project-status-sync - Update verification fields
  • issue-lifecycle - Post comments

Score

Total Score

65/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

0/10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

1ヶ月以内に更新

+10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon