← Back to list

security
by parcadei
Context management for Claude Code. Hooks maintain state via ledgers and handoffs. MCP execution without context pollution. Agent orchestration with isolated context windows.
⭐ 3,352🍴 252📅 Jan 23, 2026
SKILL.md
name: security description: Security audit workflow - vulnerability scan → verification
/security - Security Audit Workflow
Dedicated security analysis for sensitive code.
When to Use
- "Security audit"
- "Check for vulnerabilities"
- "Is this secure?"
- "Review authentication code"
- "Check for injection attacks"
- Before handling auth, payments, user data
- After adding security-sensitive features
Workflow Overview
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ aegis │───▶│ arbiter │
│ │ │ │
└─────────┘ └───────────┘
Security Verify
audit fixes
Agent Sequence
| # | Agent | Role | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | aegis | Comprehensive security scan | Vulnerability report |
| 2 | arbiter | Verify fixes, run security tests | Verification report |
Why Dedicated Security?
The /review workflow focuses on code quality. Security needs:
- Specialized vulnerability patterns
- Dependency scanning
- Secret detection
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- Authentication/authorization review
Execution
Phase 1: Security Audit
Task(
subagent_type="aegis",
prompt="""
Security audit: [SCOPE]
Scan for:
**Injection Attacks:**
- SQL injection
- Command injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- LDAP injection
**Authentication/Authorization:**
- Broken authentication
- Session management issues
- Privilege escalation
- Insecure direct object references
**Data Protection:**
- Sensitive data exposure
- Hardcoded secrets/credentials
- Insecure cryptography
- Missing encryption
**Configuration:**
- Security misconfigurations
- Default credentials
- Verbose error messages
- Missing security headers
**Dependencies:**
- Known vulnerable packages
- Outdated dependencies
- Supply chain risks
Output: Detailed report with:
- Severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Location (file:line)
- Description
- Remediation steps
"""
)
Phase 2: Verification (After Fixes)
Task(
subagent_type="arbiter",
prompt="""
Verify security fixes: [SCOPE]
Run:
- Security-focused tests
- Dependency audit (npm audit, pip audit)
- Re-check reported vulnerabilities
- Verify fixes don't introduce regressions
Output: Verification report
"""
)
Security Scopes
Full Codebase
User: /security
→ Scan entire codebase
Specific Area
User: /security authentication
→ Focus on auth-related code
Single File
User: /security src/api/auth.py
→ Deep dive on one file
Dependencies Only
User: /security --deps
→ Only dependency vulnerabilities
Example
User: /security the payment processing code
Claude: Starting /security audit for payment code...
Phase 1: Security audit...
[Spawns aegis]
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Security Audit Report │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Scope: src/services/payment/ │
│ Files scanned: 12 │
│ Lines analyzed: 2,847 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CRITICAL (1) │
│ ────────── │
│ [C1] SQL Injection in payment.py:89 │
│ query = f"SELECT * FROM orders WHERE id = {order_id}" │
│ Fix: Use parameterized queries │
│ │
│ HIGH (2) │
│ ──────── │
│ [H1] Hardcoded API key in stripe_client.py:12 │
│ STRIPE_KEY = "sk_live_..." │
│ Fix: Move to environment variable │
│ │
│ [H2] Missing input validation in refund.py:45 │
│ amount = request.json['amount'] # No validation │
│ Fix: Validate amount is positive number │
│ │
│ MEDIUM (1) │
│ ────────── │
│ [M1] Verbose error messages in error_handler.py:23 │
│ return {"error": str(e)} # Leaks internal details │
│ Fix: Return generic message, log details internally │
│ │
│ LOW (0) │
│ ─────── │
│ None │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Summary: 1 critical, 2 high, 1 medium, 0 low │
│ Status: BLOCKING - Fix critical issues before release │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Fix the critical and high issues, then run:
/security --verify
After Fixes
User: /security --verify
Claude: Phase 2: Verifying fixes...
[Spawns arbiter]
✅ C1: SQL injection fixed - using parameterized queries
✅ H1: API key moved to environment variable
✅ H2: Input validation added
✅ M1: Error messages sanitized
All security tests passing.
Security audit: PASSED
OWASP Top 10 Coverage
| Risk | Checked |
|---|---|
| A01 Broken Access Control | ✅ |
| A02 Cryptographic Failures | ✅ |
| A03 Injection | ✅ |
| A04 Insecure Design | ✅ |
| A05 Security Misconfiguration | ✅ |
| A06 Vulnerable Components | ✅ |
| A07 Auth Failures | ✅ |
| A08 Data Integrity Failures | ✅ |
| A09 Logging Failures | ✅ |
| A10 SSRF | ✅ |
Flags
--deps: Dependencies only--verify: Re-run after fixes--owasp: Explicit OWASP Top 10 report--secrets: Focus on secret detection
Score
Total Score
95/100
Based on repository quality metrics
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
✓説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
+10
✓人気
GitHub Stars 1000以上
+15
✓最近の活動
1ヶ月以内に更新
+10
✓フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
+5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
✓タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
+5
Reviews
💬
Reviews coming soon

