---

name: explore description: Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture) allowed-tools: [Bash, Task, Read, Glob, Grep, Write] keywords: [explore, codebase, architecture, understand, analyze, layers, call graph, brownfield]

Explore - Internal Codebase Exploration

Meta-skill for exploring an internal codebase at varying depths. READ-ONLY workflow - no code changes.

Usage

Copy/explore <depth> [options]

Question Flow (No Arguments)

If the user types just /explore with no or partial arguments, guide them through this question flow. Use AskUserQuestion for each phase.

Phase 0: Workflow Selection

Copyquestion: "How would you like to explore?"
header: "Explore"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose (Recommended)"
    description: "I'll ask questions to pick the right exploration depth"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Chain: tldr tree → tldr structure (~1 min)"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Chain: onboard → tldr → research → document (~5 min)"
  - label: "Architecture - layers & dependencies"
    description: "Chain: tldr arch → call graph → layer mapping (~3 min)"

Mapping:

• "Help me choose" → Continue to Phase 1-4 questions
• "Quick" → Set depth=quick, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
• "Deep" → Set depth=deep, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
• "Architecture" → Set depth=architecture, skip to Phase 2 (scope)

If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):

Copyquestion: "I want to understand how deep you want to explore. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose"
    description: "Not sure - guide me through questions"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Just want to see what's here"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Need thorough understanding"
  - label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
    description: "I'll describe what I need"

Phase 1: Exploration Goal

Copyquestion: "What are you trying to understand?"
header: "Goal"
options:
  - label: "Get oriented in the codebase"
    description: "Quick overview of structure"
  - label: "Understand how something works"
    description: "Deep dive into specific area"
  - label: "Map the architecture"
    description: "Layers, dependencies, patterns"
  - label: "Find where something is"
    description: "Locate specific code/functionality"

Mapping:

• "Get oriented" → quick depth
• "Understand how" → deep depth
• "Map architecture" → architecture depth
• "Find where" → quick with --focus

Phase 2: Scope

Copyquestion: "What area should I focus on?"
header: "Focus"
options:
  - label: "Entire codebase"
    description: "Explore everything"
  - label: "Specific directory or module"
    description: "I'll specify the path"
  - label: "Specific concept/feature"
    description: "e.g., 'authentication', 'API routes'"

If "Specific directory" or "Specific concept" → ask follow-up for the path/keyword.

Phase 3: Output Format

Copyquestion: "What should I produce?"
header: "Output"
options:
  - label: "Just tell me what you find"
    description: "Interactive summary in chat"
  - label: "Create a documentation file"
    description: "Write to thoughts/shared/docs/"
  - label: "Create handoff for implementation"
    description: "Prepare context for coding agent"

Mapping:

• "Documentation file" → --output doc
• "Handoff for implementation" → --output handoff

Phase 4: Entry Point (Architecture only)

If architecture depth selected:

Copyquestion: "Where should I start the analysis?"
header: "Entry point"
options:
  - label: "Auto-detect (main, cli, app)"
    description: "Find common entry points"
  - label: "Specific function/file"
    description: "I'll specify the entry point"

Summary Before Execution

CopyBased on your answers, I'll run:

**Depth:** deep
**Focus:** "authentication"
**Output:** handoff
**Path:** src/

Proceed? [Yes / Adjust settings]

Depths

Options

Examples

Copy# Quick structure overview
/explore quick

# Deep exploration focused on auth
/explore deep --focus "auth" --output doc

# Architecture analysis from specific entry
/explore architecture --entry "cli" --output handoff

# Quick focused exploration
/explore quick --focus "hooks"

Workflow Details

Quick Depth

Fast structure overview using tldr-explorer. Best for:

• Initial orientation
• Quick questions about structure
• Finding where things are

Steps:

1. Run tldr tree for file structure
2. Run tldr structure for codemaps
3. If --focus provided, run tldr search for targeted results
4. Return summary

Commands:

Copy# 1. File tree
tldr tree ${PATH:-src/} --ext .py

# 2. Code structure
tldr structure ${PATH:-src/} --lang python

# 3. Focused search (if --focus provided)
tldr search "${FOCUS}" ${PATH:-src/}

Deep Depth

Comprehensive exploration with documentation output. Best for:

• First time in a codebase
• Preparing for major work
• Creating reference documentation

Steps:

1. Check if onboarded (look for .claude/cache/tldr/), if not run onboard
2. Run tldr-explorer for structure
3. Spawn research-codebase agent for patterns
4. Write findings to doc or handoff

Subprocess:

Copy# 1. Onboard check
if [ ! -f .claude/cache/tldr/arch.json ]; then
    # Spawn onboard agent
fi

# 2. Structure analysis
tldr structure src/ --lang python
tldr calls src/

# 3. Research patterns (via scout agent)
Task: research-codebase → "Document existing patterns in ${FOCUS:-codebase}"

# 4. Write output
→ thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md
→ OR thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session}/explore-{focus}.yaml

Architecture Depth

Architecture-focused analysis with layer detection. Best for:

• Understanding system boundaries
• Preparing for refactoring
• Identifying coupling issues

Steps:

1. Run tldr arch for layer detection
2. Run tldr calls for cross-file call graph
3. Analyze entry/middle/leaf layers
4. Detect circular dependencies
5. Map architectural boundaries

Commands:

Copy# 1. Architecture detection
tldr arch ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: entry_layer, middle_layer, leaf_layer, circular_deps

# 2. Call graph
tldr calls ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: edges, nodes

# 3. Impact analysis from entry point (if --entry provided)
tldr impact ${ENTRY} ${PATH:-src/} --depth 3

Output Structure:

Copylayers:
  entry: [routes.py, cli.py, main.py]  # Controllers/handlers
  middle: [services.py, auth.py]        # Business logic
  leaf: [utils.py, helpers.py]          # Utilities

call_graph:
  total_edges: 142
  hot_paths: [process_request → validate → authorize]

circular_deps:
  - [module_a, module_b]  # A imports B, B imports A

boundaries:
  - name: API layer
    files: [src/api/*]
    calls_to: [src/services/*]

Output Formats

--output doc

Creates: thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md

Copy---
date: {ISO timestamp}
type: exploration
depth: {quick|deep|architecture}
focus: {focus area or "full"}
commit: {git hash}
---

# Codebase Exploration: {focus}

## Summary
{High-level findings}

## Structure
{File tree / codemaps}

## Architecture
{Layer analysis - for architecture depth}

## Key Components
{Important files and their roles}

## Patterns Found
{Existing patterns - for deep depth}

## References
- `path/to/file.py:line` - Description

--output handoff

Creates: thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session}/explore-{focus}.yaml

Copy---
type: exploration
ts: {ISO timestamp}
depth: {quick|deep|architecture}
focus: {focus area}
commit: {git hash}
---

summary: {One-line summary of findings}

structure:
  entry_points: [{main.py}, {cli.py}]
  key_modules: [{auth.py}, {routes.py}]
  test_coverage: [{tests/}]

architecture:
  layers:
    entry: [{files}]
    middle: [{files}]
    leaf: [{files}]
  circular_deps: [{pairs}]

findings:
  - {key finding with file:line}

next_steps:
  - {Recommended action based on exploration}

refs:
  - path: {file.py}
    role: {what it does}

Integration with /build

The explore skill is designed to feed into /build brownfield:

Copy# Step 1: Explore to understand
/explore architecture --output handoff

# Step 2: Build with context from exploration
/build brownfield --from-handoff thoughts/shared/handoffs/session/explore-full.yaml

Implementation

When user invokes /explore <depth> [options]:

Parse Arguments

Copydepth = args[0]  # quick | deep | architecture
focus = extract_option(args, "--focus")
output = extract_option(args, "--output")  # handoff | doc
entry = extract_option(args, "--entry")

Execute Based on Depth

Quick:

Copy# Just tldr commands, no agents
tldr tree ${src_dir} --ext .py
tldr structure ${src_dir} --lang python
if [ -n "$focus" ]; then
    tldr search "$focus" ${src_dir}
fi

Deep:

Copy# 1. Check/run onboard
if [ ! -f .claude/cache/tldr/meta.json ]; then
    # Spawn onboard agent via Task tool
fi

# 2. Structure
tldr structure src/ --lang python

# 3. Research (spawn scout agent)
# Task tool with subagent_type: "scout"
# Prompt: "Research patterns in ${focus:-codebase}"

# 4. Write output
# → doc or handoff based on --output

Architecture:

Copy# 1. Arch detection
arch_output=$(tldr arch ${src_dir})

# 2. Call graph
calls_output=$(tldr calls ${src_dir})

# 3. Impact from entry (if provided)
if [ -n "$entry" ]; then
    impact_output=$(tldr impact $entry ${src_dir} --depth 3)
fi

# 4. Synthesize and write output

Key Principles

1. READ-ONLY - This skill never modifies code
2. Uses scout, not Explore - Per project rules, scout (Sonnet) over Explore (Haiku)
3. Token-efficient - Uses tldr commands (95% savings over raw reads)
4. Outputs to shared locations - thoughts/shared/research/ or handoff directory
5. Entry point to /build - Exploration handoffs feed into brownfield builds

Related Skills

Troubleshooting

tldr not found:

Copy# Check if installed
which tldr
# Install if missing
uv tool install llm-tldr
# or: pip install llm-tldr

No Python files found:

Copy# Check language, adjust --lang
tldr structure src/ --lang typescript  # or go, rust

Empty architecture output:

Copy# May need to specify src directory
tldr arch ./  # Current directory
tldr arch src/  # Explicit src