Back to list
kurojs

jira-task

by kurojs

Advanced dotfiles featuring Hyprland + KDE hybrid desktop with AI integration, Krohnkite tiling, and comprehensive window management. Built for productivity-focused developers on Arch Linux.

0🍴 0📅 Jan 23, 2026

SKILL.md


name: jira-task description: > Creates Jira tasks following Prowler's standard format. Trigger: When user asks to create a Jira task, ticket, or issue. license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: prowler-cloud version: "1.0"

When to Use

Use this skill when creating Jira tasks for:

  • Bug reports
  • Feature requests
  • Refactoring tasks
  • Documentation tasks

Multi-Component Work: Split into Multiple Tasks

IMPORTANT: When work requires changes in multiple components (API, UI, SDK), create separate tasks for each component instead of one big task.

Why Split?

  • Different developers can work in parallel
  • Easier to review and test
  • Better tracking of progress
  • API needs to be done before UI (dependency)

Bug vs Feature: Different Structures

For BUGS: Create separate sibling tasks

Bugs are typically urgent fixes, so create independent tasks per component:

Task 1 - API:

  • Title: [BUG] Add aws_region field to AWS provider secrets (API)
  • Must be done first (UI depends on it)

Task 2 - UI:

  • Title: [BUG] Add region selector to AWS provider connection form (UI)
  • Blocked by API task

For FEATURES: Create parent + child tasks

Features need business context for stakeholders, so use a parent-child structure:

Parent Task (for PM/Stakeholders):

  • Title: [FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support
  • Contains: Feature overview, user story, acceptance criteria from USER perspective
  • NO technical details
  • Links to child tasks

Child Task 1 - API:

  • Title: [FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support (API)
  • Contains: Technical details, affected files, API-specific acceptance criteria
  • Links to parent

Child Task 2 - UI:

  • Title: [FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support (UI)
  • Contains: Technical details, component paths, UI-specific acceptance criteria
  • Links to parent, blocked by API task

Parent Task Template (Features Only)

## Description

{User-facing description of the feature - what problem does it solve?}

## User Story

As a {user type}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.

## Acceptance Criteria (User Perspective)

- [ ] User can {do something}
- [ ] User sees {something}
- [ ] {Behavior from user's point of view}

## Out of Scope

- {What this feature does NOT include}

## Design

- Figma: {link if available}
- Screenshots/mockups if available

## Child Tasks

- [ ] `[FEATURE] {Feature name} (API)` - Backend implementation
- [ ] `[FEATURE] {Feature name} (UI)` - Frontend implementation

## Priority

{High/Medium/Low} ({business justification})

Child Task Template (Features Only)

## Description

Technical implementation of {feature name} for {component}.

## Parent Task

`[FEATURE] {Feature name}`

## Acceptance Criteria (Technical)

- [ ] {Technical requirement 1}
- [ ] {Technical requirement 2}

## Technical Notes

- Affected files:
  - `{file path 1}`
  - `{file path 2}`
- {Implementation hints}

## Testing

- [ ] {Test case 1}
- [ ] {Test case 2}

## Related Tasks

- Parent: `[FEATURE] {Feature name}`
- Blocked by: {if any}
- Blocks: {if any}

Linking Tasks

In each task description, add:

## Related Tasks
- Parent: [Parent task title/link] (for child tasks)
- Blocked by: [API task title/link]
- Blocks: [UI task title/link]

Task Template

## Description

{Brief explanation of the problem or feature request}

**Current State:**
- {What's happening now / What's broken}
- {Impact on users}

**Expected State:**
- {What should happen}
- {Desired behavior}

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] {Specific, testable requirement}
- [ ] {Another requirement}
- [ ] {Include both API and UI tasks if applicable}

## Technical Notes

- {Implementation hints}
- {Affected files with full paths}
- {Dependencies or related components}

## Testing

- [ ] {Test case 1}
- [ ] {Test case 2}
- [ ] {Include regression tests}

## Priority

{High/Medium/Low} ({justification})

Title Conventions

Format: [TYPE] Brief description (components)

Types:

  • [BUG] - Something broken that worked before
  • [FEATURE] - New functionality
  • [ENHANCEMENT] - Improvement to existing feature
  • [REFACTOR] - Code restructure without behavior change
  • [DOCS] - Documentation only
  • [CHORE] - Maintenance, dependencies, CI/CD

Components (when multiple affected):

  • (API) - Backend only
  • (UI) - Frontend only
  • (SDK) - Prowler SDK only
  • (API + UI) - Both backend and frontend
  • (SDK + API) - SDK and backend
  • (Full Stack) - All components

Examples:

  • [BUG] AWS GovCloud accounts cannot connect - STS region hardcoded (API + UI)
  • [FEATURE] Add dark mode toggle (UI)
  • [REFACTOR] Migrate E2E tests to Page Object Model (UI)
  • [ENHANCEMENT] Improve scan performance for large accounts (SDK)

Priority Guidelines

PriorityCriteria
CriticalProduction down, data loss, security vulnerability
HighBlocks users, no workaround, affects paid features
MediumHas workaround, affects subset of users
LowNice to have, cosmetic, internal tooling

Affected Files Section

Always include full paths when known:

## Technical Notes

- Affected files:
  - `api/src/backend/api/v1/serializers.py`
  - `ui/components/providers/workflow/forms/aws-credentials-form.tsx`
  - `prowler/providers/aws/config.py`

Component-Specific Sections

API Tasks

Include:

  • Serializer changes
  • View/ViewSet changes
  • Migration requirements
  • API spec regeneration needs

UI Tasks

Include:

  • Component paths
  • Form validation changes
  • State management impact
  • Responsive design considerations

SDK Tasks

Include:

  • Provider affected
  • Service affected
  • Check changes
  • Config changes

Checklist Before Submitting

  1. ✅ Title follows [TYPE] description (components) format
  2. ✅ Description has Current/Expected State
  3. ✅ Acceptance Criteria are specific and testable
  4. ✅ Technical Notes include file paths
  5. ✅ Testing section covers happy path + edge cases
  6. ✅ Priority has justification
  7. Multi-component work is split into separate tasks
  8. Titles are recommended for all tasks

Output Format

For BUGS (sibling tasks):

## Recommended Tasks

### Task 1: [BUG] {Description} (API)
{Full task content}

---

### Task 2: [BUG] {Description} (UI)
{Full task content}

For FEATURES (parent + children):

## Recommended Tasks

### Parent Task: [FEATURE] {Feature name}
{User-facing content, no technical details}

---

### Child Task 1: [FEATURE] {Feature name} (API)
{Technical content for API team}

---

### Child Task 2: [FEATURE] {Feature name} (UI)
{Technical content for UI team}

Formatting Rules

CRITICAL: All output MUST be in Markdown format, ready to paste into Jira.

  • Use ## for main sections (Description, Acceptance Criteria, etc.)
  • Use **bold** for emphasis
  • Use - [ ] for checkboxes
  • Use ``` for code blocks with language hints
  • Use backticks for file paths, commands, and code references
  • Use tables where appropriate
  • Use --- to separate multiple tasks

Keywords

jira, task, ticket, issue, bug, feature, prowler

Score

Total Score

75/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

1ヶ月以内に更新

+10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon