
managing-git-workflow
by hashintel
🚀 The open-source, multi-tenant, self-building knowledge graph
SKILL.md
name: managing-git-workflow description: Git workflow for HASH including branch naming, PR creation, and PR reviews. Use when creating branches, making commits, opening pull requests, or reviewing PRs. license: AGPL-3.0 metadata: triggers: type: domain enforcement: suggest priority: high keywords: - git - branch - pull request - PR - commit - merge - review intent-patterns: - "\b(create|open|submit|review)\b.?\b(PR|pull request|branch)\b" - "\b(name|naming)\b.?\bbranch\b" - "\bH-\d+\b"
Managing Git Workflow
Standardize git workflow for HASH development, ensuring traceability between code changes and Linear issues.
Branch Naming
Format: <shortname>/h-XXXX-description
shortname: Developer identifier (first initial, nickname, etc.)h-XXXX: Linear ticket number (lowercase 'h')description: Brief kebab-case description
Examples:
t/h-4892-support-baseurl-and-version-filteralice/h-1234-add-user-authenticationbob/h-5678-fix-database-connection
Why this matters:
- Links code changes to Linear issues
- Enables progress tracking on tickets
- Maintains clear development history
Pull Request Creation
PR Title Format
Format: H-XXXX: Description
- Use uppercase 'H' in PR titles (unlike branch names)
- Keep description clear and concise
Examples:
H-4922: Add branch naming instructionsH-1234: Implement user authentication systemH-5678: Fix database connection timeout
PR Template
Use the template at .github/pull_request_template.md. Key sections:
- Purpose - High-level explanation of what and why
- Related links - Linear issues, discussions, context
- What does this change? - Specific implementation details
- Pre-merge checklist:
- Publishable library changes (npm/Cargo)
- Documentation requirements
- Turbo Graph impact
- Known issues - Intentional omissions or limitations
- Next steps - Planned follow-ups
- Tests - Automated test coverage
- How to test - Manual testing instructions
- Demo - Screenshots or videos
PR Review Process
Step 1: Gather Information
Run these commands to get full context:
# View PR metadata, description, and comments
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --comments
# View ALL changes (do not truncate)
gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER>
# View inline diff comments
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
/repos/hashintel/hash/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments
Important: Always view the FULL diff. Do not pipe into head or use --name-only.
Step 2: Check Linear Issues
Look for H-XXXX references in the PR title/description, then fetch the issue:
# If Linear MCP is configured:
mcp__linear__get_issue --issueId "H-XXXX"
# Or use Linear web UI
Use the Linear issue requirements as baseline for the review.
Step 3: Provide Feedback
- Be precise about issue locations (file:line)
- Include suggestions for improvement
- Reference relevant code standards
- Distinguish blocking issues from suggestions
Quick Reference
| Action | Format |
|---|---|
| Branch name | <shortname>/h-XXXX-description |
| PR title | H-XXXX: Description |
| View PR | gh pr view <NUMBER> --comments |
| View diff | gh pr diff <NUMBER> |
| View comments | gh api /repos/hashintel/hash/pulls/<NUMBER>/comments |
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 1000以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon


