
validation-task-artifacts
by deepeshBodh
SPEC-first multi-agent framework for Claude Code.
SKILL.md
name: validation-task-artifacts description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "review task mapping", "review tasks", "validate cycles", or mentions "task quality", "cycle review", or "TDD structure". Provides phase-specific review criteria for task artifacts with issue classification.
Reviewing Task Artifacts
Purpose
Find gaps in task artifacts and generate issues that need resolution before proceeding to the next phase. Focus on vertical slice completeness, TDD structure, and traceability. This skill provides phase-specific review criteria for the Devil's Advocate.
Review Focus by Phase
Each phase has specific checks to execute. The checks identify Critical, Important, and Minor issues.
| Phase | Focus Area | Key Checks |
|---|---|---|
| Mapping | Story coverage | All P1/P2 stories mapped to cycles |
| Mapping | Slice quality | Cycles are true vertical slices |
| Mapping | Dependencies | Foundation vs feature correctly identified |
| Tasks | TDD structure | Test-first task ordering in each cycle |
| Tasks | Coverage | All cycles have implementation tasks |
| Tasks | Format | Task IDs, file paths, markers correct |
| Cross | Traceability | Stories -> Cycles -> Tasks chain complete |
See PHASE-CHECKLISTS.md for detailed phase-specific checklists and key questions.
Issue Classification
Issues are classified by severity to determine appropriate action:
| Severity | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Blocks progress; must resolve | Return to Task Architect |
| Important | Significant gap; should resolve | Flag for this iteration |
| Minor | Polish item; can defer | Note for later |
See ISSUE-TEMPLATES.md for severity classification rules, issue documentation formats, and report templates.
Review Process
Step 1: Gather Context
Read and understand:
- The artifact being reviewed (task-mapping.md or tasks.md)
- The spec requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria)
- Plan artifacts (for consistency checks)
- Previous task artifacts (for cross-phase checks)
Step 2: Execute Checks
For each check in the phase-specific checklist:
- Ask the question
- Look for evidence in the artifact
- If issue found, classify severity
- Document the issue
Step 3: Cross-Reference
- Check traceability (can trace story -> cycle -> tasks)
- Check consistency (mapping and tasks agree)
- Check completeness (nothing obviously missing)
Step 4: Generate Report
- Classify verdict based on issues found
- Document all issues with evidence
- Provide specific, actionable suggestions
- Acknowledge what was done well
Verdict Criteria
| Verdict | Criteria |
|---|---|
| ready | Zero Critical, zero Important issues |
| needs-revision | 1-3 Important issues, fixable in one iteration |
| critical-gaps | 1+ Critical or 4+ Important issues |
Key Principles to Validate
Vertical Slicing
- Cycles should deliver user value, not horizontal layers
- Each cycle should be independently testable
- Foundation cycles contain shared infrastructure
- Feature cycles can parallelize
TDD Structure
- Every cycle starts with a test task
- Implementation follows the test
- Refactor and demo complete the cycle
- No implementation without tests
Traceability
- Every P1/P2 story maps to at least one cycle
- Every cycle has corresponding tasks
- Every task has a specific file path
- Story labels link tasks to requirements
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing review, verify:
- All phase-specific checks executed
- Issues properly classified by severity
- Evidence cited for each issue
- Suggested fixes are actionable
- Verdict matches issue severity
- Cross-artifact concerns noted
- Strengths acknowledged
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon


