Back to list
anton-abyzov

unit-testing-expert

by anton-abyzov

Autonomous AI Development Framework. Build production software with specs, tests, and docs that write themselves. Works with Claude, Cursor, Copilot.

23🍴 3📅 Jan 24, 2026

SKILL.md


name: unit-testing-expert description: Comprehensive unit testing expertise covering Vitest, Jest, test-driven development (TDD), mocking strategies, test coverage, snapshot testing, test architecture, testing patterns, dependency injection, test doubles (mocks, stubs, spies, fakes), async testing, error handling tests, parametric testing, test organization, code coverage analysis, mutation testing, and production-grade unit testing best practices. Activates for unit testing, vitest, jest, test-driven development, TDD, red-green-refactor, mocking, stubbing, spying, test doubles, test coverage, snapshot testing, test architecture, dependency injection, async testing, test patterns, code coverage, mutation testing, test isolation, test fixtures, AAA pattern, given-when-then, test organization, testing best practices, vi.fn, vi.mock, vi.spyOn, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach.

Unit Testing Expert

Self-contained unit testing expertise for Vitest/Jest in ANY user project.


Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle:

// 1. RED: Write failing test
describe('Calculator', () => {
  it('should add two numbers', () => {
    const calc = new Calculator();
    expect(calc.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);
  });
});

// 2. GREEN: Minimal implementation
class Calculator {
  add(a: number, b: number): number {
    return a + b;
  }
}

// 3. REFACTOR: Improve code
class Calculator {
  add(...numbers: number[]): number {
    return numbers.reduce((sum, n) => sum + n, 0);
  }
}

TDD Benefits:

  • Better design (testable code)
  • Living documentation
  • Faster debugging
  • Higher confidence

Vitest/Jest Fundamentals

Basic Test Structure

import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach, vi } from 'vitest';
import { UserService } from './UserService';

describe('UserService', () => {
  let service: UserService;

  beforeEach(() => {
    service = new UserService();
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks();
  });

  it('should create user', () => {
    const user = service.create({ name: 'John', email: 'john@test.com' });

    expect(user).toMatchObject({
      id: expect.any(String),
      name: 'John',
      email: 'john@test.com'
    });
  });

  it('should throw for invalid email', () => {
    expect(() => {
      service.create({ name: 'John', email: 'invalid' });
    }).toThrow('Invalid email');
  });
});

Async Testing

it('should fetch user from API', async () => {
  const user = await api.fetchUser('user-123');

  expect(user).toEqual({
    id: 'user-123',
    name: 'John Doe'
  });
});

// Testing async errors
it('should handle API errors', async () => {
  await expect(api.fetchUser('invalid')).rejects.toThrow('User not found');
});

Mocking Strategies

1. Mock Functions

// Mock a function
const mockFn = vi.fn();
mockFn.mockReturnValue(42);
expect(mockFn()).toBe(42);

// Mock with implementation
const mockAdd = vi.fn((a, b) => a + b);
expect(mockAdd(2, 3)).toBe(5);

// Verify calls
expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expected);

2. Mock Modules

// Mock entire module
vi.mock('./database', () => ({
  query: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1, name: 'Test' }])
}));

import { query } from './database';

it('should fetch users from database', async () => {
  const users = await query('SELECT * FROM users');
  expect(users).toHaveLength(1);
});

3. Spies

// Spy on existing method
const spy = vi.spyOn(console, 'log');

myFunction();

expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Expected message');
spy.mockRestore();

4. Mock Dependencies

class UserService {
  constructor(private db: Database) {}

  async getUser(id: string) {
    return this.db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [id]);
  }
}

// Test with mock
const mockDb = {
  query: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: '123', name: 'John' })
};

const service = new UserService(mockDb);
const user = await service.getUser('123');

expect(mockDb.query).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
  'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?',
  ['123']
);

Test Patterns

AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)

it('should calculate total price', () => {
  // Arrange
  const cart = new ShoppingCart();
  cart.addItem({ price: 10, quantity: 2 });
  cart.addItem({ price: 5, quantity: 3 });

  // Act
  const total = cart.getTotal();

  // Assert
  expect(total).toBe(35);
});

Given-When-Then (BDD)

describe('Shopping Cart', () => {
  it('should apply discount when total exceeds $100', () => {
    // Given: A cart with items totaling $120
    const cart = new ShoppingCart();
    cart.addItem({ price: 120, quantity: 1 });

    // When: Getting the total
    const total = cart.getTotal();

    // Then: 10% discount applied
    expect(total).toBe(108); // $120 - $12 (10%)
  });
});

Parametric Testing

describe.each([
  [2, 3, 5],
  [10, 5, 15],
  [-1, 1, 0],
  [0, 0, 0]
])('Calculator.add(%i, %i)', (a, b, expected) => {
  it(`should return ${expected}`, () => {
    const calc = new Calculator();
    expect(calc.add(a, b)).toBe(expected);
  });
});

Test Doubles

Mocks vs Stubs vs Spies vs Fakes

Mock: Verifies behavior (calls, arguments)

const mock = vi.fn();
mock('test');
expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('test');

Stub: Returns predefined values

const stub = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(42);
expect(stub()).toBe(42);

Spy: Observes real function

const spy = vi.spyOn(obj, 'method');
obj.method();
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled();

Fake: Working implementation (simplified)

class FakeDatabase {
  private data = new Map();

  async save(key, value) {
    this.data.set(key, value);
  }

  async get(key) {
    return this.data.get(key);
  }
}

Coverage Analysis

Running Coverage

# Vitest
vitest --coverage

# Jest
jest --coverage

Coverage Thresholds

// vitest.config.ts
export default {
  test: {
    coverage: {
      provider: 'v8',
      reporter: ['text', 'html', 'lcov'],
      lines: 80,
      functions: 80,
      branches: 80,
      statements: 80
    }
  }
};

Coverage Best Practices

✅ DO:

  • Aim for 80-90% coverage
  • Focus on business logic
  • Test edge cases
  • Test error paths

❌ DON'T:

  • Chase 100% coverage
  • Test getters/setters only
  • Test framework code
  • Write tests just for coverage

Snapshot Testing

When to Use Snapshots

Good use cases:

  • UI component output
  • API responses
  • Configuration objects
  • Error messages
it('should render user card', () => {
  const card = renderUserCard({ name: 'John', role: 'Admin' });
  expect(card).toMatchSnapshot();
});

// Update snapshots: vitest -u

Avoid snapshots for:

  • Dates/timestamps
  • Random values
  • Large objects (prefer specific assertions)

Test Organization

File Structure

src/
├── services/
│   ├── UserService.ts
│   └── UserService.test.ts      ← Co-located
tests/
├── unit/
│   └── utils.test.ts
├── integration/
│   └── api.test.ts
└── fixtures/
    └── users.json

Test Naming

✅ GOOD:

describe('UserService.create', () => {
  it('should create user with valid email', () => {});
  it('should throw error for invalid email', () => {});
  it('should generate unique ID', () => {});
});

❌ BAD:

describe('UserService', () => {
  it('test1', () => {});
  it('should work', () => {});
});

Error Handling Tests

// Synchronous errors
it('should throw for negative numbers', () => {
  expect(() => sqrt(-1)).toThrow('Cannot compute square root of negative');
});

// Async errors
it('should reject for invalid ID', async () => {
  await expect(fetchUser('invalid')).rejects.toThrow('Invalid ID');
});

// Error types
it('should throw TypeError', () => {
  expect(() => doSomething()).toThrow(TypeError);
});

// Custom errors
it('should throw ValidationError', () => {
  expect(() => validate()).toThrow(ValidationError);
});

Test Isolation

Reset State Between Tests

let service: UserService;

beforeEach(() => {
  service = new UserService();
  vi.clearAllMocks();
});

afterEach(() => {
  vi.restoreAllMocks();
});

Avoid Test Interdependence

❌ BAD:

let user;

it('should create user', () => {
  user = createUser(); // Shared state
});

it('should update user', () => {
  updateUser(user); // Depends on previous test
});

✅ GOOD:

it('should update user', () => {
  const user = createUser();
  updateUser(user);
  expect(user.updated).toBe(true);
});

VSCode Debug Mode & Child Process Testing

CRITICAL: When tests spawn child processes (like CLI tools, hooks, or external commands), they may fail in VSCode debug mode due to NODE_OPTIONS inheritance.

Problem: NODE_OPTIONS Breaks Child Processes

VSCode debugger sets NODE_OPTIONS=--inspect-brk=<port> which child processes inherit, causing them to try to attach to the same debugger port and fail with exit code 1.

Symptoms:

  • Tests pass with "Run Test" but fail with "Debug Test"
  • Spawned processes exit with code 1 and empty output
  • spawnSync/execFileSync calls fail silently

Solution: getCleanEnv() Pattern

// src/utils/clean-env.ts
export function getCleanEnv(): NodeJS.ProcessEnv {
  const cleanEnv = { ...process.env };

  // Debugger flags (VSCode, WebStorm, IntelliJ)
  delete cleanEnv.NODE_OPTIONS;
  delete cleanEnv.NODE_INSPECT;
  delete cleanEnv.NODE_INSPECT_RESUME_ON_START;

  // Coverage/instrumentation (CI/CD pipelines)
  delete cleanEnv.NODE_V8_COVERAGE;
  delete cleanEnv.VSCODE_INSPECTOR_OPTIONS;

  return cleanEnv;
}

Usage in Tests

import { getCleanEnv } from '../test-utils/clean-env.js';
import { execSync, spawnSync } from 'child_process';

it('should execute CLI command', () => {
  const result = execSync('node my-cli.js', {
    encoding: 'utf-8',
    env: getCleanEnv(),  // ← CRITICAL for debug mode + CI/CD
  });
  expect(result).toContain('expected output');
});

it('should spawn child process', () => {
  const result = spawnSync('npm', ['run', 'build'], {
    encoding: 'utf-8',
    env: getCleanEnv(),  // ← CRITICAL
  });
  expect(result.status).toBe(0);
});

When to Use getCleanEnv

✅ ALWAYS USE when spawning:

  • CLI tools (node, npm, npx, claude, etc.)
  • External commands (git, gh, etc.)
  • Test hooks that spawn processes
  • Integration tests with real processes

❌ NOT NEEDED for:

  • Pure unit tests (no child processes)
  • Mocked dependencies
  • In-process testing

ESM Module Mocking with vi.hoisted()

CRITICAL: In ESM (ECMAScript Modules), imports are hoisted. Use vi.hoisted() to ensure mocks are defined before imports.

Problem: Mock Defined After Import

// ❌ WRONG: vi.mock hoisted, but mockFn not defined yet
vi.mock('./module', () => ({
  myFunc: mockFn  // ReferenceError: mockFn is not defined
}));

const mockFn = vi.fn();
import { myFunc } from './module';

Solution: vi.hoisted() Pattern

import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';

// ✅ Define mocks in hoisted context FIRST
const { mockFn } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
  mockFn: vi.fn()
}));

// Now vi.mock can use the hoisted mock
vi.mock('./module', () => ({
  myFunc: mockFn
}));

// Import AFTER mock setup
import { myFunc } from './module';

describe('Module', () => {
  it('should use mocked function', () => {
    mockFn.mockReturnValue('mocked');
    expect(myFunc()).toBe('mocked');
    expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalled();
  });
});

Complete ESM Mocking Example

import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';

// 1. Hoisted mock definitions
const { mockReadFile, mockWriteFile } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
  mockReadFile: vi.fn(),
  mockWriteFile: vi.fn()
}));

// 2. Mock the module using hoisted mocks
vi.mock('fs/promises', () => ({
  readFile: mockReadFile,
  writeFile: mockWriteFile
}));

// 3. Import AFTER mock setup (imports are automatically hoisted in Vitest)
import { readFile, writeFile } from 'fs/promises';

describe('FileService', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks();
  });

  it('should read file', async () => {
    mockReadFile.mockResolvedValue('file content');

    const content = await readFile('/path/to/file', 'utf-8');

    expect(content).toBe('file content');
    expect(mockReadFile).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/path/to/file', 'utf-8');
  });
});

vi.hoisted() vs Traditional Mocking

ApproachESM CompatibleJest Compatible
vi.hoisted() + vi.mock()✅ Yes❌ No (Vitest only)
jest.mock() with factory⚠️ Partial✅ Yes
Manual module replacement✅ Yes✅ Yes

Testing with Isolated Temp Directories

CRITICAL: Integration tests should NEVER operate on project directories. Always use isolated temp directories.

Problem: Tests Affecting Project State

// ❌ DANGEROUS: Can corrupt project state
const testDir = path.join(process.cwd(), '.specweave/test');

Solution: Isolated Temp Directories

import * as os from 'os';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as fs from 'fs/promises';

// ✅ SAFE: Unique temp directory per test run
const TEST_ROOT = path.join(
  os.tmpdir(),
  `my-test-${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2)}`
);

describe('Integration Test', () => {
  beforeEach(async () => {
    await fs.mkdir(TEST_ROOT, { recursive: true });
  });

  afterEach(async () => {
    await fs.rm(TEST_ROOT, { recursive: true, force: true });
  });

  it('should work in isolated directory', async () => {
    const testFile = path.join(TEST_ROOT, 'test.json');
    await fs.writeFile(testFile, '{"test": true}');
    // Test logic...
  });
});

CWD Restoration Pattern

When tests change working directory, always restore it to prevent affecting other tests:

describe('Tests that change CWD', () => {
  let originalCwd: string;

  beforeEach(() => {
    originalCwd = process.cwd();  // ← Save BEFORE changing
    process.chdir(TEST_ROOT);
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    process.chdir(originalCwd);   // ← Restore BEFORE cleanup
    // Now safe to delete TEST_ROOT
  });
});

Best Practices Summary

✅ DO:

  • Write tests before code (TDD)
  • Test behavior, not implementation
  • One assertion per test (when possible)
  • Clear test names (should...)
  • Mock external dependencies
  • Test edge cases and errors
  • Keep tests fast (<100ms each)
  • Use descriptive variable names
  • Clean up after tests

❌ DON'T:

  • Test private methods directly
  • Share state between tests
  • Use real databases/APIs
  • Test framework code
  • Write fragile tests (implementation-dependent)
  • Skip error cases
  • Use magic numbers
  • Leave commented-out tests

Quick Reference

Assertions

expect(value).toBe(expected);              // ===
expect(value).toEqual(expected);           // Deep equality
expect(value).toBeTruthy();                // Boolean true
expect(value).toBeFalsy();                 // Boolean false
expect(array).toHaveLength(3);             // Array length
expect(array).toContain(item);             // Array includes
expect(string).toMatch(/pattern/);         // Regex match
expect(fn).toThrow(Error);                 // Throws error
expect(obj).toHaveProperty('key');         // Has property
expect(value).toBeCloseTo(0.3, 5);        // Float comparison

Lifecycle Hooks

beforeAll(() => {});      // Once before all tests
beforeEach(() => {});     // Before each test
afterEach(() => {});      // After each test
afterAll(() => {});       // Once after all tests

Mock Utilities

vi.fn()                           // Create mock
vi.fn().mockReturnValue(x)        // Return value
vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(x)      // Async return
vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(e)      // Async error
vi.mock('./module')               // Mock module
vi.spyOn(obj, 'method')           // Spy on method
vi.clearAllMocks()                // Clear call history
vi.resetAllMocks()                // Reset + clear
vi.restoreAllMocks()              // Restore originals

This skill is self-contained and works in ANY user project with Vitest/Jest.

Score

Total Score

75/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

1ヶ月以内に更新

+10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon