
council-review
by amiable-dev
The LLM Council works together to answer your hardest questions
SKILL.md
name: council-review description: | Multi-model code review with structured feedback using LLM Council peer evaluation. Use for PR reviews, code quality checks, or implementation review. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality check, peer review, feedback
license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: "llm-council >= 2.0, mcp >= 1.0" metadata: category: code-review domain: software-engineering council-version: "2.0" author: amiable-dev repository: https://github.com/amiable-dev/llm-council
allowed-tools: "Read Grep Glob mcp:llm-council/verify mcp:llm-council/audit"
Council Code Review Skill
Get multiple AI perspectives on code changes with structured, actionable feedback.
When to Use
- Review pull requests before merging
- Get code quality feedback on implementations
- Identify potential issues across multiple dimensions
- Validate changes against coding standards
Workflow
- Prepare Input: Provide file paths or git diff
- Invoke Review: Call
mcp:llm-council/verifywith code-review rubric - Process Feedback: Receive structured scores and issue list
- Address Issues: Fix blocking issues before proceeding
Input Formats
Supports both:
file_paths: List of files to review (full file analysis)git_diff: Unified diff format for change-focused reviewsnapshot_id: Git commit SHA (required for reproducibility)
Rubric (ADR-016)
| Dimension | Weight | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 35% | Correctness, no bugs, logic errors |
| Completeness | 20% | All requirements addressed |
| Clarity | 20% | Readable, maintainable code |
| Conciseness | 15% | No unnecessary complexity |
| Relevance | 10% | Addresses stated requirements |
Output Schema
{
"verdict": "pass|fail|unclear",
"confidence": 0.82,
"rubric_scores": {
"accuracy": 7.5,
"completeness": 8.0,
"clarity": 9.0,
"conciseness": 8.5,
"relevance": 9.0
},
"blocking_issues": [
{
"severity": "major",
"file": "src/api.py",
"line": 42,
"message": "Missing input validation"
}
],
"suggestions": [...],
"rationale": "Overall, the code is well-structured..."
}
Example Usage
# Review specific files
council-review --file-paths "src/main.py,src/utils.py" --snapshot abc123
# Review git diff
council-review --git-diff "$(git diff HEAD~1)" --snapshot $(git rev-parse HEAD)
# Review with custom focus
council-review --rubric-focus Security --file-paths "src/auth.py"
Progressive Disclosure
- Level 1: This metadata (~200 tokens)
- Level 2: Full instructions above (~800 tokens)
- Level 3: See
references/code-review-rubric.mdfor detailed scoring anchors
Related Skills
council-verify: General verificationcouncil-gate: CI/CD quality gate
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon


