
when-debugging-ml-training-use-ml-training-debugger
by aiskillstore
Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.
SKILL.md
name: when-debugging-ml-training-use-ml-training-debugger version: 1.0.0 description: Debug ML training issues and optimize performance including loss divergence, overfitting, and slow convergence category: machine-learning tags: [debugging, ml, training, optimization, troubleshooting] agents: [ml-developer, performance-analyzer, coder] difficulty: advanced estimated_duration: 30-60min success_criteria:
- Issue diagnosed correctly
- Root cause identified
- Fix applied successfully
- Training convergence restored validation_method: training_validation dependencies:
- claude-flow@alpha
- tensorflow/pytorch
- tensorboard (for visualization) outputs:
- Diagnostic report
- Fixed model/training code
- Performance comparison
- Optimization recommendations triggers:
- Training loss diverging/NaN
- Overfitting detected
- Slow convergence
- Poor validation performance
ML Training Debugger - Diagnose and Fix Training Issues
Overview
Systematic debugging workflow for ML training issues including loss divergence, overfitting, slow convergence, gradient problems, and performance optimization.
When to Use
- Training loss becomes NaN or infinite
- Severe overfitting (train >> val performance)
- Training not converging
- Gradient vanishing/exploding
- Poor validation accuracy
- Training too slow
Phase 1: Diagnose Issue (8 min)
Objective
Identify the specific training problem
Agent: ML-Developer
Step 1.1: Analyze Training Curves
import json
import numpy as np
# Load training history
with open('training_history.json', 'r') as f:
history = json.load(f)
# Diagnose issues
diagnosis = {
'loss_divergence': check_loss_divergence(history['loss']),
'overfitting': check_overfitting(history['loss'], history['val_loss']),
'slow_convergence': check_convergence_rate(history['loss']),
'gradient_issues': check_gradient_health(history),
'nan_values': any(np.isnan(history['loss']))
}
def check_loss_divergence(losses):
# Loss increasing over time
if len(losses) > 10:
recent_trend = np.mean(losses[-5:]) > np.mean(losses[-10:-5])
return recent_trend
def check_overfitting(train_loss, val_loss):
# Val loss diverging from train loss
if len(train_loss) > 10:
gap = np.mean(val_loss[-5:]) - np.mean(train_loss[-5:])
return gap > 0.5 # Significant gap
def check_convergence_rate(losses):
# Loss barely changing
if len(losses) > 20:
recent_change = abs(losses[-1] - losses[-10])
return recent_change < 0.01 # Plateau
await memory.store('ml-debugger/diagnosis', diagnosis)
Step 1.2: Identify Root Cause
root_causes = []
if diagnosis['loss_divergence']:
root_causes.append({
'issue': 'Loss Divergence',
'likely_cause': 'Learning rate too high',
'severity': 'HIGH',
'fix': 'Reduce learning rate by 10x'
})
if diagnosis['nan_values']:
root_causes.append({
'issue': 'NaN Loss',
'likely_cause': 'Numerical instability',
'severity': 'CRITICAL',
'fix': 'Add gradient clipping, reduce LR, check data for extreme values'
})
if diagnosis['overfitting']:
root_causes.append({
'issue': 'Overfitting',
'likely_cause': 'Model too complex or insufficient regularization',
'severity': 'MEDIUM',
'fix': 'Add dropout, L2 regularization, or more training data'
})
if diagnosis['slow_convergence']:
root_causes.append({
'issue': 'Slow Convergence',
'likely_cause': 'Learning rate too low or poor initialization',
'severity': 'LOW',
'fix': 'Increase learning rate, use better initialization'
})
await memory.store('ml-debugger/root-causes', root_causes)
Step 1.3: Generate Diagnostic Report
report = f"""
# ML Training Diagnostic Report
## Issues Detected
{chr(10).join([f"- **{rc['issue']}** (Severity: {rc['severity']})" for rc in root_causes])}
## Root Cause Analysis
{chr(10).join([f"""
### {rc['issue']}
- **Likely Cause**: {rc['likely_cause']}
- **Recommended Fix**: {rc['fix']}
""" for rc in root_causes])}
## Training History Summary
- Final Train Loss: {history['loss'][-1]:.4f}
- Final Val Loss: {history['val_loss'][-1]:.4f}
- Epochs Completed: {len(history['loss'])}
"""
with open('diagnostic_report.md', 'w') as f:
f.write(report)
Validation Criteria
- Issues identified
- Root causes determined
- Severity assessed
- Report generated
Phase 2: Analyze Root Cause (10 min)
Objective
Deep dive into the specific problem
Agent: Performance-Analyzer
Step 2.1: Gradient Analysis
import tensorflow as tf
# Monitor gradients during training
def gradient_analysis(model, X_batch, y_batch):
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
predictions = model(X_batch, training=True)
loss = loss_fn(y_batch, predictions)
gradients = tape.gradient(loss, model.trainable_variables)
analysis = {
'gradient_norms': [tf.norm(g).numpy() for g in gradients if g is not None],
'has_nan': any(tf.reduce_any(tf.math.is_nan(g)) for g in gradients if g is not None),
'has_inf': any(tf.reduce_any(tf.math.is_inf(g)) for g in gradients if g is not None)
}
# Check for vanishing/exploding gradients
gradient_norms = np.array(analysis['gradient_norms'])
analysis['vanishing'] = np.mean(gradient_norms) < 1e-7
analysis['exploding'] = np.mean(gradient_norms) > 100
return analysis
grad_analysis = gradient_analysis(model, X_train[:32], y_train[:32])
await memory.store('ml-debugger/gradient-analysis', grad_analysis)
Step 2.2: Data Analysis
# Check for data issues
data_issues = {
'class_imbalance': check_class_balance(y_train),
'outliers': detect_outliers(X_train),
'missing_normalization': check_normalization(X_train),
'label_noise': estimate_label_noise(X_train, y_train, model)
}
def check_class_balance(labels):
unique, counts = np.unique(labels, return_counts=True)
imbalance_ratio = max(counts) / min(counts)
return imbalance_ratio > 10 # Significant imbalance
def check_normalization(data):
mean = np.mean(data, axis=0)
std = np.std(data, axis=0)
# Data should be roughly normalized
return np.mean(np.abs(mean)) > 1 or np.mean(std) > 10
await memory.store('ml-debugger/data-issues', data_issues)
Step 2.3: Model Architecture Review
# Analyze model complexity
architecture_analysis = {
'total_params': model.count_params(),
'trainable_params': sum([tf.size(v).numpy() for v in model.trainable_variables]),
'depth': len(model.layers),
'has_batch_norm': any('batch_norm' in layer.name for layer in model.layers),
'has_dropout': any('dropout' in layer.name for layer in model.layers),
'activation_functions': [layer.activation.__name__ for layer in model.layers if hasattr(layer, 'activation')]
}
# Check for common issues
architecture_issues = []
if architecture_analysis['total_params'] / len(X_train) > 10:
architecture_issues.append('Model too complex relative to data size')
if not architecture_analysis['has_batch_norm'] and architecture_analysis['depth'] > 10:
architecture_issues.append('Deep model without batch normalization')
await memory.store('ml-debugger/architecture-issues', architecture_issues)
Validation Criteria
- Gradients analyzed
- Data issues identified
- Architecture reviewed
- Problems documented
Phase 3: Apply Fix (15 min)
Objective
Implement corrections based on diagnosis
Agent: Coder
Step 3.1: Fix Learning Rate
if 'Loss Divergence' in [rc['issue'] for rc in root_causes]:
# Reduce learning rate
old_lr = model.optimizer.learning_rate.numpy()
new_lr = old_lr / 10
model.optimizer.learning_rate.assign(new_lr)
print(f"✅ Reduced learning rate: {old_lr} → {new_lr}")
if 'Slow Convergence' in [rc['issue'] for rc in root_causes]:
# Increase learning rate with warmup
new_lr = old_lr * 5
model.optimizer.learning_rate.assign(new_lr)
# Add LR scheduler
lr_scheduler = tf.keras.callbacks.ReduceLROnPlateau(
monitor='val_loss',
factor=0.5,
patience=5,
min_lr=1e-7
)
Step 3.2: Fix Overfitting
if 'Overfitting' in [rc['issue'] for rc in root_causes]:
# Add regularization
from tensorflow.keras import regularizers
# Clone model with regularization
new_layers = []
for layer in model.layers:
if isinstance(layer, tf.keras.layers.Dense):
new_layer = tf.keras.layers.Dense(
layer.units,
activation=layer.activation,
kernel_regularizer=regularizers.l2(0.01), # Add L2
name=layer.name + '_reg'
)
new_layers.append(new_layer)
# Add dropout after dense layers
new_layers.append(tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.3))
else:
new_layers.append(layer)
# Rebuild model
fixed_model = tf.keras.Sequential(new_layers)
fixed_model.compile(
optimizer=model.optimizer,
loss=model.loss,
metrics=model.metrics
)
print("✅ Added L2 regularization and dropout")
Step 3.3: Fix Gradient Issues
if grad_analysis['exploding']:
# Add gradient clipping
optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(
learning_rate=0.001,
clipnorm=1.0 # Clip by global norm
)
model.compile(
optimizer=optimizer,
loss=model.loss,
metrics=model.metrics
)
print("✅ Added gradient clipping")
if grad_analysis['vanishing']:
# Use better activation functions
# Replace sigmoid/tanh with ReLU/LeakyReLU
for layer in model.layers:
if hasattr(layer, 'activation'):
if layer.activation.__name__ in ['sigmoid', 'tanh']:
layer.activation = tf.keras.activations.relu
print(f"✅ Changed {layer.name} activation to ReLU")
Step 3.4: Fix Data Issues
if data_issues['class_imbalance']:
# Compute class weights
from sklearn.utils.class_weight import compute_class_weight
class_weights = compute_class_weight(
'balanced',
classes=np.unique(y_train),
y=y_train
)
class_weight_dict = dict(enumerate(class_weights))
print(f"✅ Applying class weights: {class_weight_dict}")
if data_issues['missing_normalization']:
# Re-normalize data
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_fixed = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_val_fixed = scaler.transform(X_val)
print("✅ Data re-normalized")
Validation Criteria
- Fixes applied
- Model recompiled
- Data corrected
- Ready for retraining
Phase 4: Validate Fix (12 min)
Objective
Verify that fixes resolve the issues
Agent: Performance-Analyzer
Step 4.1: Retrain Model
# Retrain with fixes
print("Retraining model with fixes...")
history_fixed = model.fit(
X_train_fixed, y_train,
validation_data=(X_val_fixed, y_val),
batch_size=32,
epochs=50,
callbacks=[
tf.keras.callbacks.EarlyStopping(patience=10),
lr_scheduler if 'Slow Convergence' in [rc['issue'] for rc in root_causes] else None
],
class_weight=class_weight_dict if data_issues['class_imbalance'] else None,
verbose=1
)
# Save fixed training history
with open('training_history_fixed.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump({
'loss': history_fixed.history['loss'],
'val_loss': history_fixed.history['val_loss'],
'accuracy': history_fixed.history['accuracy'],
'val_accuracy': history_fixed.history['val_accuracy']
}, f)
Step 4.2: Compare Before/After
comparison = {
'before': {
'final_train_loss': history['loss'][-1],
'final_val_loss': history['val_loss'][-1],
'final_val_acc': history['val_accuracy'][-1],
'converged': len(history['loss']) < 100
},
'after': {
'final_train_loss': history_fixed.history['loss'][-1],
'final_val_loss': history_fixed.history['val_loss'][-1],
'final_val_acc': history_fixed.history['val_accuracy'][-1],
'converged': history_fixed.history['val_loss'][-1] < history_fixed.history['val_loss'][-10]
},
'improvement': {
'val_loss_reduction': (history['val_loss'][-1] - history_fixed.history['val_loss'][-1]) / history['val_loss'][-1] * 100,
'val_acc_improvement': (history_fixed.history['val_accuracy'][-1] - history['val_accuracy'][-1]) * 100
}
}
await memory.store('ml-debugger/comparison', comparison)
Step 4.3: Visualize Comparison
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(12, 10))
# Loss comparison
axes[0,0].plot(history['loss'], label='Before (Train)', alpha=0.7)
axes[0,0].plot(history['val_loss'], label='Before (Val)', alpha=0.7)
axes[0,0].plot(history_fixed.history['loss'], label='After (Train)', linestyle='--')
axes[0,0].plot(history_fixed.history['val_loss'], label='After (Val)', linestyle='--')
axes[0,0].set_title('Loss Comparison')
axes[0,0].legend()
axes[0,0].grid(True)
# Accuracy comparison
axes[0,1].plot(history['accuracy'], label='Before (Train)', alpha=0.7)
axes[0,1].plot(history['val_accuracy'], label='Before (Val)', alpha=0.7)
axes[0,1].plot(history_fixed.history['accuracy'], label='After (Train)', linestyle='--')
axes[0,1].plot(history_fixed.history['val_accuracy'], label='After (Val)', linestyle='--')
axes[0,1].set_title('Accuracy Comparison')
axes[0,1].legend()
axes[0,1].grid(True)
plt.savefig('training_comparison.png')
Validation Criteria
- Retraining successful
- Issues resolved
- Improvement documented
- Comparison visualized
Phase 5: Optimize Performance (5 min)
Objective
Apply additional optimizations
Agent: ML-Developer
Step 5.1: Generate Recommendations
recommendations = []
if comparison['after']['final_val_acc'] < 0.85:
recommendations.append({
'type': 'Architecture',
'suggestion': 'Try deeper model or different architecture (CNN, Transformer)',
'expected_improvement': '+5-10% accuracy'
})
if comparison['after']['final_val_loss'] > 0.5:
recommendations.append({
'type': 'Data',
'suggestion': 'Collect more training data or apply data augmentation',
'expected_improvement': 'Better generalization'
})
if history_fixed.history['loss'][-1] > 0.1:
recommendations.append({
'type': 'Training',
'suggestion': 'Train longer with learning rate scheduling',
'expected_improvement': 'Lower training loss'
})
await memory.store('ml-debugger/recommendations', recommendations)
Step 5.2: Generate Final Report
# ML Training Debug Report
## Original Issues
${root_causes.map(rc => `- ${rc.issue}: ${rc.likely_cause}`).join('\n')}
## Fixes Applied
${fixes_applied.map(fix => `- ${fix}`).join('\n')}
## Results
### Before
- Val Loss: ${comparison.before.final_val_loss.toFixed(4)}
- Val Accuracy: ${(comparison.before.final_val_acc * 100).toFixed(2)}%
### After
- Val Loss: ${comparison.after.final_val_loss.toFixed(4)}
- Val Accuracy: ${(comparison.after.final_val_acc * 100).toFixed(2)}%
### Improvement
- Val Loss Reduction: ${comparison.improvement.val_loss_reduction.toFixed(2)}%
- Val Accuracy Gain: +${comparison.improvement.val_acc_improvement.toFixed(2)}%
## Recommendations for Further Improvement
${recommendations.map((r, i) => `${i+1}. **${r.type}**: ${r.suggestion} (${r.expected_improvement})`).join('\n')}
Validation Criteria
- Recommendations generated
- Final report complete
- Model saved
- Ready for production
Success Metrics
- Training converges successfully
- Validation loss improved by >10%
- No NaN or infinite values
- Overfitting reduced
Skill Completion
Outputs:
- diagnostic_report.md: Issue analysis
- fixed_model.h5: Corrected model
- training_comparison.png: Before/after visualization
- optimization_recommendations.md: Next steps
Complete when training issues resolved and model performing well.
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon
