
systematic-debugging
by aiskillstore
Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.
SKILL.md
name: systematic-debugging description: Four-phase root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Use when debugging bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior.
Systematic Debugging
ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.
When to Use
- Encountering bugs or test failures
- Unexpected behavior in code
- Before proposing any fix
The Four Phases
Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
Before proposing any solution:
- Read error messages thoroughly - Don't skip warnings or stack traces; they often contain exact solutions
- Reproduce consistently - Verify you can trigger the issue reliably with documented steps
- Check recent changes - Examine
git diff, dependencies, and configuration modifications - Gather diagnostic evidence - In multi-component systems, add instrumentation at component boundaries
- Trace data flow - Backward trace from the error to find where bad values originate
Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
Establish the pattern before fixing:
- Locate similar working code in the codebase
- Read reference implementations completely (not skimmed)
- List every difference between working and broken code
- Understand all dependencies and assumptions
Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing
Apply scientific method:
- State your hypothesis clearly: "I believe X is failing because Y, evidenced by Z"
- Test with the smallest possible change
- Change only ONE variable at a time
- Verify results before proceeding
Phase 4: Implementation
Fix the root cause systematically:
- Create a failing test case first (TDD)
- Implement a single fix addressing only the root cause
- Verify the fix resolves the issue without breaking other tests
- If fix doesn't work, return to Phase 1
Red Flags - STOP Immediately
- Proposing fixes without understanding the issue
- Attempting multiple simultaneous changes
- Assuming problems without verification
- Skipping evidence gathering
- Making "quick fixes" before investigation
When 3+ Fixes Fail
STOP. This signals an architectural problem, not a fixable bug:
- Do not attempt another fix
- Return to Phase 1
- Question whether the underlying pattern/design is sound
- Ask: "Should we refactor architecture vs. continue fixing symptoms?"
Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.
Results
Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to resolution with 95% first-time success vs. Trial-and-error: 2-3 hours of thrashing with 40% success and new bugs introduced
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon
