← Back to list

pr-review
by 5dlabs
Cognitive Task Orchestrator - GitOps on Bare Metal or Cloud for AI Agents
⭐ 2🍴 1📅 Jan 25, 2026
SKILL.md
name: pr-review description: Pull request review patterns including focus areas, feedback guidelines, and approval criteria. agents: [stitch] triggers: [pr, pull request, review, feedback, merge]
Pull Request Review
Patterns for effective code review that maintains quality while supporting developers.
Review Focus Areas
- Correctness - Does the code do what it's supposed to?
- Security - Are there any security vulnerabilities?
- Performance - Are there performance concerns?
- Maintainability - Is the code readable and maintainable?
- Testing - Are there adequate tests?
- Style - Does it follow project conventions?
Review Process
- PR Details - Fetch PR diff and description
- Context - Understand the feature/fix being implemented
- Code Analysis - Review each changed file
- Pattern Recognition - Check for known issues with similar patterns
- Feedback - Post review comments
Review Guidelines
Be Constructive
- Focus on the code, not the person
- Explain the "why" behind suggestions
- Offer alternatives, not just criticism
- Acknowledge good patterns when you see them
Categorize Feedback
| Category | Action | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Blocking | Must fix before merge | Security vulnerability, bug |
| Suggestion | Should consider | Performance improvement |
| Nit | Nice to have | Style preference |
| Question | Need clarification | Design decision |
Common Review Points
Code Quality:
- Are function names clear and descriptive?
- Is the code DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)?
- Are there any obvious bugs?
- Is error handling comprehensive?
Security:
- Are inputs validated?
- Are secrets properly managed?
- Are there any injection vulnerabilities?
- Is auth/authz properly enforced?
Performance:
- Are there N+1 query patterns?
- Is there unnecessary computation?
- Are there memory leaks?
- Is caching used appropriately?
Testing:
- Are new features tested?
- Are edge cases covered?
- Are tests readable and maintainable?
- Is test coverage adequate?
Documentation:
- Are public APIs documented?
- Are complex algorithms explained?
- Is the PR description clear?
Approval Criteria
Approve if:
- Code is correct and addresses the requirements
- No security vulnerabilities
- Tests are adequate
- Style follows conventions
- Only nits or minor suggestions remain
Request Changes if:
- There are blocking issues
- Security vulnerabilities exist
- Critical functionality is untested
- Major design concerns
Comment if:
- Have questions but no blocking issues
- Want to discuss alternatives
- Providing information for future consideration
Review Etiquette
- Review promptly (within 24 hours)
- Be respectful and professional
- Assume positive intent
- If it's not clear, ask
- Provide context for your suggestions
- Follow up on your own comments
PR Description Template
Good PRs include:
## Summary
Brief description of what this PR does
## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
## Testing
How this was tested
## Screenshots (if UI)
Before/after screenshots
## Related Issues
Closes #123
Score
Total Score
65/100
Based on repository quality metrics
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
✓最近の活動
1ヶ月以内に更新
+10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
✓タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
+5
Reviews
💬
Reviews coming soon


