
marketing-ai-search-optimization
by vasilyu1983
SKILL.md
name: marketing-ai-search-optimization description: Modern search visibility optimization covering traditional search fundamentals, SERP evolution, and optional assistant/answer-engine visibility with technical setup, content strategies, and measurement frameworks.
SEARCH VISIBILITY & MODERN DISCOVERY — OPERATIONAL SKILL
This skill contains actionable, production-ready systems for content discoverability across traditional search and modern SERP surfaces. Assistant/answer-engine visibility is covered only in clearly labeled optional sections.
Structure: Core search visibility fundamentals first. AI-specific optimization in clearly labeled "Optional: AI / Automation" sections.
Core: Search Intent Modeling
Every piece of content must map to user intent. Misaligned intent = wasted effort.
| Intent Type | User Goal | Content Format | Conversion Likelihood |
|---|---|---|---|
| Informational | Learn/understand | Guides, tutorials, explainers | Low (nurture) |
| Navigational | Find specific brand/page | Brand pages, product docs | Medium (existing interest) |
| Commercial | Research before buying | Comparisons, reviews, vs-pages | High |
| Transactional | Buy/sign up now | Pricing, checkout, demo pages | Highest |
Do
- Map content inventory to intent types
- Prioritize commercial + transactional for revenue impact
- Use informational content for top-of-funnel brand building
- Match page structure to intent (transactional = short; informational = comprehensive)
Avoid
- Publishing "informational" content expecting direct conversions
- Mixing multiple intents on one page
- Ignoring navigational intent (your brand searches matter)
Modern Best Practices (January 2026)
Sources: Seer Interactive GEO Guide, Search Engine Land AI SEO, Ahrefs AI Overviews Study
The GEO Reality (Generative Engine Optimization)
| Metric | January 2026 Value | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| AI Overviews presence | 15-16% of all queries | Growing steadily |
| CTR drop from AI Overviews | 61% average | Significant traffic loss |
| AI Overview citations from top 10 | 76% | Traditional SEO still matters |
| Zero-click searches | 65%+ of all searches | Visibility ≠ clicks |
| AI Overview conversion rate | 14.2% (vs 2.8% organic) | 5x quality premium |
What Changed: Traditional SEO vs GEO
| Factor | Traditional SEO | GEO (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary goal | Rank in blue links | Get cited in AI responses |
| Content format | Long-form, comprehensive | Concise, quotable statements |
| Authority signals | Backlinks, domain age | Citations, original data, E-E-A-T |
| Optimization target | Keywords | Questions + entities |
| Success metric | Rankings, clicks | Citations, brand mentions |
AI Overviews Optimization Checklist
✅ Structure content for citation extraction:
- First paragraph: Direct, quotable answer (40-60 words optimal for AI extraction)
- AI Overview responses average 157 words; 99% stay under 328 words
- Use "According to..." or "Research shows..." patterns
- Include specific numbers, percentages, dates
- Attribute claims to sources
✅ Question-answer architecture:
## How long does [X] take?
[Direct answer in first sentence]. [Supporting context]. [Specific numbers].
✅ Entity optimization:
- Define terms clearly before using them
- Link to Wikipedia/authoritative entities
- Use consistent naming conventions
- Add structured data (Organization, Person, Product)
✅ Freshness signals:
- Update cornerstone content every 60-90 days (content <90 days old receives 2.7x higher citation rates)
- Add "Last updated: [date]" visibly
- Reference current year in content
- Update statistics and data points
GEO Content Formula
Citable content pattern:
[Definitive statement]. [Specific data point]. [Source attribution].
Example:
"The average enterprise SaaS contract is worth $118,000 annually. According to KeyBanc's 2025 SaaS Survey, this represents a 23% increase from 2024."
AI Overview Citation Triggers
| Content Type | Citation Likelihood | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Original research/data | Very High | Unique, authoritative, verifiable |
| Step-by-step guides | High | Actionable, structured, complete |
| Definitions/explanations | High | Clear, quotable, educational |
| Listicles/comparisons | High (25% of citations) | Structured, scannable, decision-useful |
| Comparisons with specifics | Medium-High | Decision-useful, balanced |
| Opinion/commentary | Low | Not authoritative enough |
| Thin aggregation | Very Low | No unique value |
Platform-Specific Optimization (January 2026)
| Platform | Market Share | Optimization Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI Overviews | 90%+ of AI search | Critical |
| ChatGPT Browse/Search | Growing | High |
| Perplexity | ~5M daily users | Medium-High |
| Bing Copilot | Limited | Medium |
| Claude | Research use | Low-Medium |
Platform Citation Patterns (2026 Benchmarks)
Each AI platform has distinct citation preferences. Only 11% of domains are cited by both ChatGPT and Perplexity—platform-specific strategies are essential.
| Platform | Top Citation Source | % of Citations | Optimization Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Wikipedia, encyclopedic content | 47.9% | Authoritative, comprehensive definitions |
| Perplexity | Reddit, forums | 46.7% | Community validation, real user experiences |
| Google AI Overviews | YouTube, multimodal | 23.3% | Video content, visual explanations |
Source: Averi.ai B2B SaaS Citation Benchmarks Report 2026
What NOT to Do (GEO Anti-Patterns)
| ❌ Mistake | Why It Fails | ✅ Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Create "AI-optimized" pages | Weakens intent match | Optimize existing high-value pages |
| Stuff content with questions | Feels spammy, ignores intent | Use questions that match real queries |
| Block AI crawlers entirely | Reduces visibility everywhere | Use selective controls, monitor impact |
| Ignore traditional SEO | 76% of citations come from top 10 | GEO is additive, not replacement |
| Chase every AI platform | Spreads effort too thin | Focus on Google AI Overviews first |
Core: SERP Surface Evolution (January 2026)
Search results are no longer 10 blue links. Modern SERP surfaces:
| SERP Feature | Visibility Impact | Optimization Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Rich Results (eligible types only) | High — enhanced display | Implement only where supported |
| Answer Boxes | Very high — position zero | Concise, direct answers |
| Knowledge Panels | High for entities | Entity/brand optimization |
| People Also Ask | Medium-high | Question-answer format |
| Local Pack (if relevant) | High | Strong location signals + GBP |
| Video / Image Surfaces | Medium-high | Media SEO + clear metadata |
| Zero-Click / On-SERP Answers | High | Optimize for visibility + intent |
Zero-Click Reality
More queries are satisfied on the results page via answer boxes, panels, and rich results. Plan for it:
| Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
| Accept | Optimize for brand visibility in zero-click (answer boxes, panels) |
| Adapt | Target queries with click-through intent (commercial/transactional) |
| Measure | Track impressions AND clicks, not just rankings |
Do
- Use structured data only where eligible and accurate; do not assume visibility (FAQ rich results eligibility is limited; HowTo rich results are deprecated: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/08/howto-faq-changes and https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/faqpage)
- Structure content for featured snippet extraction (question → direct answer → details)
- Monitor SERP features for your target keywords
Avoid
- Measuring SEO success by rankings alone (impressions matter)
- Ignoring zero-click—it's visibility even without traffic
- Over-optimizing for features your content can't win
Core: Brand Visibility & Trust Signals
E-E-A-T Framework (Google Quality Raters)
| Signal | What It Means | How to Demonstrate |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | First-hand knowledge | Case studies, original data, personal narrative |
| Expertise | Subject matter depth | Author credentials, technical accuracy |
| Authoritativeness | Industry recognition | Backlinks, citations, press mentions |
| Trust | Reliability, safety | HTTPS, clear contact, accurate info, reviews |
Source: Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines (used for human evaluation, not a direct ranking checklist): https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterhub.com/en//searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf
Do
- Add author bios with credentials to expertise content
- Include original research, data, or unique insights
- Get cited by authoritative sources in your niche
- Keep information accurate and updated
Avoid
- Anonymous "admin" authored content for YMYL topics
- Rehashing competitor content without adding value
- Neglecting site security and trust signals
Core: Content Discoverability Checklist
Use before publishing any content:
| Check | Requirement | Pass/Fail |
|---|---|---|
| Intent mapped | Clear primary intent identified (one page = one intent) | |
| H1 + meta title | Include target query, <60 chars | |
| Meta description | Clear value prop, <155 chars | |
| URL structure | 5-7 words, semantic, no parameters | |
| Internal links | 3+ contextual links to/from related pages | |
| Structured data | Implement only eligible, accurate types | |
| First paragraph | Direct answer to query in first 100 words | |
| Freshness signal | Date published/updated visible | |
| Mobile usability | Mobile-first layout and QA (see Google guidance on Page Experience and retired Mobile Usability report: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/04/page-experience-in-search) | |
| Performance | Core Web Vitals monitored (LCP/INP/CLS: https://web.dev/articles/vitals) |
Heading Structure Requirements
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| H1 | 1 per page, contains primary keyword |
| H2 | 2–5 per page, covers subtopics |
| H3 | Only if nested under H2 |
Anti-patterns: Multiple H1s, random heading order, skipping levels (H1 → H3)
E-E-A-T Requirements (Critical for YMYL Topics)
For content in health, finance, legal, or sensitive topics:
Required trust pages:
- About page (with credentials)
- Methodology page (how data/predictions are calculated)
- Disclaimer page
- Contact page (real phone/email)
- Privacy Policy + Terms of Service
Without E-E-A-T signals → Pages drop from index (especially YMYL).
For a comprehensive audit covering both traditional and AI search visibility, use search-visibility-audit.md.
Core: Measurement Framework
What to Track
Track visibility, engagement, and business outcomes together (Search Console metric definitions: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7576553?hl=en).
| Metric | Where | Use It For |
|---|---|---|
| Impressions | Google Search Console | Demand/visibility trends by query/page |
| Clicks | Google Search Console | Traffic contribution by query/page |
| CTR | Google Search Console | Snippet/title alignment to intent |
| Average position | Google Search Console | Directional ranking movement (not a KPI alone) |
| Landing conversions | Analytics/CRM | Query/page → lead/signup/purchase rate |
| Assisted conversions | Analytics | Content influence across longer journeys |
| Brand demand | Search Console + Trends | Branded query growth and protection |
What to Ignore (Vanity)
- Rankings without traffic context
- Impressions without CTR analysis
- Backlink counts without quality assessment and relevance
- Page-level metrics without conversion attribution
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- Search intent and content mapping
- SERP feature targeting and snippet optimization
- Content discoverability audits (technical + editorial)
- Brand visibility and trust signal improvements (E-E-A-T)
- Measurement plans (impressions, clicks, CTR, assisted conversions)
- Optional: visibility in AI answer engines and assistant surfaces
Quick Reference
| Task | Resource/Template | Location | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search visibility audit | Search Visibility Audit Checklist | assets/audits/search-visibility-audit.md | Baseline and prioritize improvements |
| Technical SEO audit | SEO Technical Audit Checklist | ../marketing-seo-complete/assets/audits/full-technical-audit.md | Crawl/index/render/performance issues |
| Content distribution | Distribution Plan (Search + Social) | ../marketing-social-media/assets/content-distribution-plan.md | Ship content with a plan for demand capture |
| Landing conversion | Landing Page Conversion Checklist | ../marketing-leads-generation/assets/landing-audit-checklist.md | Improve CVR from search traffic |
| Optional: AI visibility | AI Search Content Audit | assets/audits/ai-search-content-audit.md | Validate assistant/answer engine visibility |
Decision Trees (Quick Use)
### High impressions, low clicks (GSC)
Intent mismatch → Narrow query target or split page by intent
Snippet mismatch → Rewrite title/snippet to match query language and value
SERP feature loss → Add eligible structured data; improve media; strengthen internal links
### Traffic ok, conversions low
Wrong offer for intent → Add comparison/pricing/use-case path for commercial intent
Friction high → Reduce form fields, speed up page, improve trust signals
Weak proof → Add quantified outcomes, case studies, security/compliance
### Page not indexed / not visible
Blocked → robots.txt / meta robots / auth / soft-404
Duplicate → canonical + internal linking + sitemap hygiene
JS render issues → SSR/SSG for primary content (dynamic rendering is deprecated: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/javascript/dynamic-rendering)
### Optional: AI answer engines not mentioning brand
[Inference] Audience uses assistants → Run AI visibility checks + fix discoverability
[Inference] Brand missing → Publish canonical, citable pages; strengthen entity signals
For optional AI/assistant decision trees, see the "Optional: AI / Automation" section.
Navigation
Core Resources
- assets/audits/search-visibility-audit.md - Baseline audit checklist
- references/measurement-analytics.md - Measurement and analytics setup notes
- references/llm-tracking-tools.md - LLM visibility tracking tools comparison (January 2026)
- ../marketing-seo-complete/SKILL.md - Deep technical SEO playbooks
Optional: AI / Automation Guides
- references/ai-indexing-complete-guide.md - Complete DO & DON'T guide (January 2026)
- references/platform-chatgpt.md - ChatGPT/SearchGPT optimization
- references/platform-perplexity.md - Perplexity ranking strategies
- references/platform-claude.md - Claude AI search optimization
- references/platform-gemini.md - Google Gemini strategies
- references/platform-google-ai-overviews.md - SGE/AIO optimization
Templates
Technical
- assets/technical/robots-txt-ai-crawlers.md
- assets/technical/ai-search-schema-templates.md
- assets/technical/server-side-rendering-guide.md
- assets/technical/llms-txt-template.md - Optional: Proposed standard for AI crawler navigation (780+ adopters including Cloudflare, Vercel; spec v1.0.0)
Content
- assets/content/ai-search-content-brief.md
- assets/content/answer-focused-article-template.md
- assets/content/entity-rich-content-template.md
Audits & Testing
- assets/audits/search-visibility-audit.md - NEW Full search visibility audit (traditional + AI)
- assets/audits/ai-search-content-audit.md
- assets/audits/crawler-access-audit.md
- assets/testing/ai-search-testing-protocol.md
Tracking
Related Skills
Marketing & SEO
- ../marketing-social-media/SKILL.md - Social distribution and community workflows
- ../product-management/SKILL.md - Product positioning and messaging alignment
Technical Implementation
- ../software-frontend/SKILL.md - SSR implementation and technical optimization
- ../software-backend/SKILL.md - API endpoints, caching, and reliability
- ../ops-devops-platform/SKILL.md - CI/CD, CDN, and infrastructure performance
Data & Analytics
- ../data-sql-optimization/SKILL.md - Analytics warehousing for search visibility metrics
Optional: AI / Automation
- ../ai-prompt-engineering/SKILL.md - Content assistance workflows (with human review)
- ../ai-agents/SKILL.md - Monitoring and reporting automation patterns
Key Differentiators
[Inference] This skill treats modern search as a system: crawl/index/render + intent + SERP surfaces + measurement. Optional AI/assistant optimization is additive, not a replacement.
External Resources
See data/sources.json for 28 primary documentation sources across:
- Google Search docs (fundamentals, crawling/indexing, appearance)
- web.dev guidance (Core Web Vitals and performance)
- Search Console measurement definitions
- Optional assistant visibility controls (Google-Extended, GPTBot) (tagged optional)
Getting Started
First-time setup (30–60 minutes):
- Run assets/audits/search-visibility-audit.md on the top 10–20 pages.
- Fix obvious indexability issues (robots/noindex/canonicals/sitemaps) using ../marketing-seo-complete/SKILL.md.
- Pick 5–10 queries per ICP segment; map each to a single intent and page.
- Add measurement: GSC dashboards + conversion events (define what "conversion" means).
Weekly cadence (60 minutes/week):
- Review GSC: high impressions + low CTR queries; ship 5 title/snippet improvements.
- Review conversions by landing page; fix the 1–2 worst offenders with the CRO checklist.
- Ship 1 new commercial-intent page or update 1 core page for freshness and proof.
Optional: AI / Automation
Note: Use this only if your ICP actually discovers products via assistants/answer engines. Keep SEO fundamentals as the baseline.
What to Do First (AI Visibility)
- Run
assets/audits/ai-search-content-audit.mdon 5–10 key pages. - Validate that key pages are indexable and canonical (assistants often cite canonical URLs first).
- Ensure content has citation-grade proof: original data, reproducible steps, and clear definitions.
Crawler Controls (AI Training vs Search)
- Google-Extended is a standalone product token that publishers can use to control whether their content is used for certain AI features; it does not impact inclusion in Google Search (https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/google-common-crawlers#google-extended).
- [Inference] For other providers, follow their official crawler documentation for allow/deny and rate limits; do not guess user-agent strings.
Do (AI Visibility)
- Prioritize pages that already drive conversions (not net-new content for an unproven channel).
- Make claims auditable: add sources, screenshots, definitions, and dates.
- Keep a single canonical URL per topic; avoid duplicate thin variants.
Avoid (AI Visibility)
- Treating assistant visibility as a replacement for SEO or product positioning.
- Publishing "AI-first" pages that weaken intent match and conversion clarity.
- Over-investing in tools before you can observe any incremental pipeline impact.
Collaboration Notes
With Product
Core
- Positioning and messaging should inform target queries and page hierarchy.
- Feature pages need clear claims, proof, and intent-aligned CTAs.
- Docs and changelogs should be indexable, canonical, and internally linked.
Optional: AI / Automation
- [Inference] Technical docs are frequently reused in assistant answers; keep them current and link to canonical sources.
With Sales
Core
- Mine objections and FAQs to create commercial-intent pages (comparisons, security, integrations, pricing).
- Align on "good lead" definition so content targets the right intent.
Optional: AI / Automation
- [Inference] Monitor brand/competitor questions in assistants to find missing pages and trust gaps.
With Engineering
Core
- Implement and version control:
robots.txt, canonicals, redirects, sitemaps, and structured data. - Maintain performance budgets and monitor Core Web Vitals (https://web.dev/articles/vitals).
- Ensure analytics events and UTMs survive navigation and cross-domain flows.
Optional: AI / Automation
- Coordinate any AI training controls (for example Google-Extended: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/google-common-crawlers#google-extended).
Trend Awareness Protocol (January 2026)
IMPORTANT: When users ask recommendation questions about AI search or modern discovery, you MUST use WebSearch to check current trends before answering.
Trigger Conditions
- "How do I optimize for AI search?"
- "What's the latest with ChatGPT/Perplexity/Google AI Overviews?"
- "How should I think about AI search in 2026?"
- "Current best practices for [AEO/GEO/AI citations/answer engines]?"
- "Is [AI search platform] worth optimizing for?"
- "How has AI changed search behavior?"
- "What's the impact of AI Overviews on traffic?"
- "How do I get cited in AI responses?"
Required Searches
- Search:
"AI search optimization best practices January 2026" - Search:
"Google AI Overviews impact CTR 2026" - Search:
"GEO generative engine optimization 2026" - Search:
"ChatGPT Perplexity citation patterns 2026"
What to Report
After searching, provide:
- Current landscape: What AI search platforms matter NOW (Google AI Overviews = critical)
- GEO vs SEO: How generative engine optimization differs from traditional SEO
- Citation patterns: What content types get cited in AI responses
- Emerging trends: New AI search features or platforms
- Deprecated/declining: Approaches that don't work with AI search
- Recommendation: Based on fresh data, not just static knowledge
Key 2026 Metrics to Track
| Metric | Current Value (Jan 2026) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| AI Overviews query coverage | 15-16% | Growing |
| CTR impact from AI Overviews | -61% average | Significant |
| Citations from top 10 results | 76% | Stable |
| Zero-click rate | 65%+ | Growing |
| Perplexity daily users | ~5M | Growing fast |
Example Topics (verify with fresh search)
- Google AI Overviews citation triggers and optimization
- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) strategies
- ChatGPT Browse and citation patterns
- Perplexity Pro search and sources
- Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) techniques
- Zero-click search adaptation strategies
- Structured data for AI consumption
- Content freshness signals for AI systems
2026 Ranking Factors for AI Search Visibility
Sources: Backlinko Ranking Study, Search Engine Land AI SEO, Princeton GEO Study
AI Citation Ranking Factors
AI systems (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity) pull citations differently than traditional search. Key factors:
| Factor | Weight | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Topical authority | Critical | AI systems prefer sources that cover topics comprehensively |
| Content freshness | High | AI Overviews favor updated content; 3-month recency ideal |
| Quotability | High | Concise, definitive statements get cited more often |
| Original data/research | High | Unique statistics, studies, surveys are citation magnets |
| E-E-A-T signals | High | Author credentials, methodology pages, clear sourcing |
| Traditional rankings | High | 76% of AI Overview citations come from top 10 results |
| Structured data | Medium | Helps AI understand entities, relationships, facts |
| Site speed | Medium | Fast sites get crawled more, indexed fresher |
Content Attributes That Get Cited
| Attribute | Citation Rate | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Specific numbers | Very High | "72% of users prefer..." vs "most users prefer..." |
| Step-by-step processes | High | Numbered, actionable instructions |
| Definitions | High | "X is defined as..." or "[Term] refers to..." |
| Comparisons | Medium-High | "X vs Y: [specific differences]" |
| Expert quotes | Medium | Named sources with credentials |
| General opinions | Low | Vague statements without backing |
Algorithm Update Impact (December 2025)
| Update | Impact on AI Visibility |
|---|---|
| Helpful Content integration | Low-value AI content filtered aggressively |
| E-E-A-T elevation | Experience signals now required, not optional |
| Brand authority boost | Known brands appear more in AI Overviews |
| Freshness weighting | Stale content drops faster in AI citations |
GEO Ranking Checklist
Technical foundation (same as traditional SEO):
- Core Web Vitals passing (LCP <2.5s, INP <200ms, CLS <0.1)
- Mobile-first optimized
- Fast TTFB (<600ms)
- Clean crawlability (no blocks, proper canonicals)
AI citation optimization:
- First paragraph contains quotable, definitive answer
- Specific numbers, dates, statistics included
- Claims attributed to sources
- Author bio with credentials (for YMYL)
- "Last updated" date visible and accurate
- Structured data for key entities
Content structure:
- One clear intent per page
- Question-based H2s matching real queries
- Direct answers before elaboration
- Original data or unique insights
Anti-Patterns
Core
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting rankings only | Hides the real outcome | Report impressions, clicks, CTR, and conversions (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7576553?hl=en) |
| Publishing without intent mapping | Pages miss the query and the CTA | One page, one primary intent, one primary conversion |
| Gating early-stage pages | Kills discovery and trust | Gate only high-intent or high-value assets |
| Schema spam | Manual actions risk; no upside | Implement accurate, eligible structured data only |
| Many thin near-duplicates | Cannibalization and index bloat | Consolidate to canonical pages + strong internal links |
Optional: AI / Automation
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Publishing "AI-first" pages | Weakens intent match and conversion clarity | Treat assistant visibility as additive to SEO |
| Blocking all crawlers "for protection" | Can reduce visibility in multiple systems | Use explicit controls and rate limiting where needed |
| Chasing every assistant platform | Spreads effort too thin | Validate one channel with measurable pipeline impact first |
Complete AI Indexing Guide (January 2026)
For the full DO & DON'T guide with implementation priorities, see: → ai-indexing-complete-guide.md
Quick Reference
| Metric | Value | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Traffic shift to AI | 25% by 2026 | Gartner |
| Visibility boost from GEO | +40% | Princeton study |
| Citations from top 10 | 76% | Traditional SEO still critical |
Top 3 Actions:
- Allow AI crawlers in robots.txt (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot)
- Add statistics to top pages (+35-40% visibility)
- Update content every 60-90 days (freshness signal)
December 2025 Change: ChatGPT-User no longer respects robots.txt—block at firewall if needed.
For crawler setup: ai-crawler-technical-setup.md
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon