← Back to list

web-design-reviewer
by tienbm92
Personal AI context base used for bootstrapping new projects and feature development. Acts as the backbone for architecture, domain rules, and reusable design patterns.
⭐ 0🍴 0📅 Jan 26, 2026
SKILL.md
name: web-design-reviewer description: 'Expert-level UI/UX design review. Phân tích design mockups, live websites để đưa ra actionable feedback về visual design, UX, accessibility, responsive design.'
Web Design Reviewer Skill
Skill này provide comprehensive design review methodology cho web designs, đưa ra expert-level feedback và actionable recommendations.
Khi Nào Sử Dụng
- Review design mockups trước development
- Analyze live websites cho improvements
- Audit UI/UX của existing products
- Prepare feedback cho design team
- Validate accessibility compliance
- Check responsive design implementation
Review Framework
1. First Impressions (5 giây đầu)
| Aspect | Question |
|---|---|
| Clarity | Purpose của page rõ ràng không? |
| Hierarchy | Visual priority có đúng không? |
| Brand | Có nhận ra brand identity không? |
| Trust | Design có professional không? |
2. Visual Design Analysis
Typography Review
- Font pairing có harmonious không?
- Hierarchy rõ ràng (H1 > H2 > body)?
- Line height comfortable (1.4-1.6 cho body)?
- Font sizes responsive?
- Contrast đủ cho readability?
Color Review
- Palette có cohesive không?
- Contrast ratio đạt WCAG (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)?
- Meaning của colors consistent?
- Không rely chỉ vào color để convey information?
- Dark/light mode supported?
Spacing & Layout
- Spacing consistent (8px grid)?
- White space adequate?
- Visual grouping logical?
- Content width comfortable (45-75 characters)?
- Alignment precise?
Imagery & Icons
- Images high quality, relevant?
- Icon style consistent?
- Alt text for images?
- Loading states for media?
3. UX Analysis
Navigation
- Nav structure intuitive?
- Current location clear?
- Breadcrumbs where needed?
- Search easily accessible?
- Mobile nav works well?
Interactions
- Clickable areas obvious?
- Hover/active states clear?
- Loading feedback present?
- Error states helpful?
- Success confirmations clear?
Forms
- Labels clear and visible?
- Input validation helpful?
- Error messages specific?
- Required fields marked?
- Auto-complete where appropriate?
4. Accessibility Audit
Visual
- Color contrast WCAG AA
- Text resizable to 200%
- Focus indicators visible
- No flashing content
Semantic
- Proper heading hierarchy
- ARIA labels where needed
- Alt text meaningful
- Skip links present
Interaction
- Keyboard navigable
- Touch targets 44px+
- No hover-only content
- Form labels associated
5. Responsive Review
| Breakpoint | Check |
|---|---|
| Mobile (375px) | Touch-friendly, readable |
| Tablet (768px) | Layout adapts, not just shrunk |
| Desktop (1280px) | Uses space effectively |
| Wide (1920px+) | Content not too stretched |
Review Output Format
Summary
- Overall score (1-10)
- Top 3 strengths
- Top 3 areas for improvement
- Priority issues
Detailed Findings
## [Category]: [Issue Title]
**Severity**: High/Medium/Low
**Location**: [Page/Component]
**Issue**:
[Description của problem]
**Impact**:
[Tại sao đây là problem]
**Recommendation**:
[Cách fix cụ thể]
**Reference**:
[Link to guideline/best practice]
Severity Levels
| Level | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Blocks users, accessibility violation | Fix immediately |
| High | Significant UX issue | Fix before launch |
| Medium | Notable improvement | Plan to fix |
| Low | Nice-to-have | Consider for future |
Review Checklist Quick Reference
Must Have (Critical)
- Content readable
- Navigation works
- Forms functional
- Mobile usable
- Key actions accessible
Should Have (High)
- Visual hierarchy clear
- Feedback on actions
- Error handling graceful
- Loading states present
- Consistent styling
Nice to Have (Medium/Low)
- Micro-interactions
- Animation polish
- Edge case handling
- Advanced accessibility
- Performance optimization
Design Principles Reference
Visual Hierarchy
- Size - Larger = more important
- Color - Bolder/brighter = more important
- Position - Top/left = first seen
- Spacing - More white space = emphasis
- Typography - Weight and style differentiate
Gestalt Principles
- Proximity - Group related items
- Similarity - Similar appearance = related
- Continuity - Eye follows lines/curves
- Closure - Brain completes incomplete shapes
- Figure/Ground - Distinguish foreground from background
F-Pattern & Z-Pattern
- F-pattern for text-heavy pages
- Z-pattern for minimal content
- Place important elements in these scan paths
Common Issues Catalog
Typography Issues
| Issue | Impact | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Too many fonts | Chaotic look | Max 2-3 fonts |
| Poor contrast | Hard to read | Min 4.5:1 ratio |
| Long lines | Eye strain | Max 75 characters |
| Tight spacing | Dense, hard to scan | Increase line height |
Layout Issues
| Issue | Impact | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| No visual hierarchy | Confusion | Size/weight variation |
| Cramped spacing | Overwhelming | 8px grid system |
| Misalignment | Unprofessional | Strict alignment grid |
| Inconsistent margins | Disjointed | Design tokens |
UX Issues
| Issue | Impact | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Hidden navigation | Lost users | Visible, clear nav |
| No feedback | Uncertainty | Loading/success states |
| Unclear CTAs | Low conversion | Clear, contrasting buttons |
| Complex forms | Abandonment | Progressive disclosure |
Tools for Review
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Browser DevTools | Inspect elements, test responsive |
| WAVE | Accessibility audit |
| Lighthouse | Performance + accessibility |
| Contrast Checker | Color accessibility |
| Responsively | Multi-device preview |
Score
Total Score
70/100
Based on repository quality metrics
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
✓説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
+10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
Reviews
💬
Reviews coming soon