
smith-gh-pr
by tianjianjiang
AGENTS.md as dotfiles: Personal coding standards that follow you everywhere, Mr. Anderson.
SKILL.md
name: smith-gh-pr description: GitHub PR workflows including creation, review cycles, merge strategies, and stacked PRs. Use when creating PRs, reviewing code, merging branches, or managing stacked PR workflows. Covers rebase decision trees and AI-generated descriptions.
GitHub PR Workflows
- Load if: Creating PRs, reviewing code, merging, stacked PRs
- Prerequisites: @smith-principles/SKILL.md, @smith-standards/SKILL.md,
@smith-git/SKILL.md
CRITICAL (Primacy Zone)
- MUST run quality checks before creating PR
- MUST ensure branch is up-to-date before requesting review or merging
- MUST link to related issues
- MUST have all CI checks passing before merge
Avoid GitHub MCP
- GitHub MCP tools (
mcp__github__*) - hard to control pagination (token waste), less complete than CLI, requires personal token
Use instead: gh pr-review extension, gh api, or GraphQL queries
PR Title Format
Follow conventional commits format. See @smith-style/SKILL.md for details.
PR Creation Workflow
Pre-PR checklist:
- Run linter and formatter
- Run tests
- Rebase onto parent branch (not always main - check stacked PRs)
- Push to remote
AI-generated descriptions: Analyze full diff, read ALL commits, identify tickets, generate structured summary (What/Why/Testing/Dependencies).
Working on Existing PRs
- ALWAYS get actual branch name:
gh pr view {PR} --json headRefName - ALWAYS check for review comments before making changes
- ALWAYS update PR title/body after pushing changes
Code Review Cycle
- Fetch review comments using
gh pr-review(see "Fetching Review Comments" below) - Get ALL comments including Nitpicks - don't skip minor issues
- Categorize: Actionable > Nitpick > Clarification > Discussion
- Proactively audit similar issues in other files not explicitly mentioned
- Implement fixes with confidence scoring (high: implement, low: ask)
- High confidence: Small surface area change, aligns with existing patterns, covered by tests
- Low confidence: Ambiguous behavior, architectural impact, requires design discussion
- Reply to comments with commit SHA
- Resolve threads after addressing - don't leave resolved issues open
- Re-check for new comments after CI passes
Code review response rules:
- File-inline comments (on specific lines): MUST reply in-thread using
gh pr-review comments reply --thread-id {PRRT_xxx}, NOT as PR-level comment. This keeps discussion traceable to the code location. - PR-level comments (general discussion,
<details>blocks): Reply withgh pr commentor GitHub's "Quote reply" - Reply with commit SHA, then resolve thread with
gh pr-review threads resolve - Proactive audit: search codebase for similar issues before committing
- CodeRabbit
<details>comments (Nitpicks, Duplicated, Outside diff range): These appear in PR thread, not inline on files. Use GitHub's "Quote reply" to include Markdown blockquote of the essential part (e.g.,> The redundant text...), making response traceable - Research questionable suggestions before implementing (see
@smith-research/SKILL.md)
- NEVER reply to file-inline comments with
gh pr comment(loses thread context) - NEVER mention
@copilotin replies (triggers unwanted sub-PRs)
Fetching Review Comments
Use gh pr-review over gh api - structured output with thread IDs.
All commands require --pr {number} -R {owner}/{repo} for numeric PR selectors.
Install: gh extension install agynio/gh-pr-review (consider pinning to vetted SHA)
On gh pr-review errors:
- Check if extension installed:
gh extension list | grep pr-review - Verify command syntax (common: missing
--pr, wrong-Rformat) - Verify repo name:
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner - If not installed:
gh extension install agynio/gh-pr-review
List unresolved threads: gh pr-review threads list --pr {number} -R {owner}/{repo} --unresolved
gh-pr-review Commands
View reviews (use --unresolved, --reviewer, --states to filter):
gh pr-review review view --pr {number} -R {owner}/{repo}
Reply to thread:
gh pr-review comments reply --pr {number} -R {owner}/{repo} --thread-id {PRRT_xxx} --body "..."
Resolve/unresolve thread:
gh pr-review threads resolve --pr {number} -R {owner}/{repo} --thread-id {PRRT_xxx}
Output includes thread_id (PRRT_xxx format) needed for reply/resolve operations.
REST API (Single Comments)
URL patterns map to API endpoints:
#issuecomment-{id}→gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}#discussion_r{id}→gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/comments/{id}#pullrequestreview-{id}→gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews/{id}
Rebase Decision Tree
Behind base, no conflicts, explicit "update": AUTO-REBASE Behind base, no conflicts, not explicit: ASK user Behind base, conflicts detected: INFORM + ASK Parent PR merged: INFORM + OFFER cascade About to request review, outdated: BLOCK + INFORM
Staleness thresholds: <5 commits (fresh), 5-10 (notify), >10 (recommend), >20 (urgent)
Note: The above decision tree provides guidance during active development. The MUST requirement for up-to-date branches is enforced when requesting review or merging.
Merge Strategies
Merge commit: Feature branches with meaningful history Squash: Small fixes, docs, single logical change Rebase: Linear history required, clean commits
Stacked PRs
For stacked PRs, merge parent WITHOUT --delete-branch, then:
gh pr edit {CHILD} --base main
git rebase --onto origin/main feat/parent_branch
git push --force-with-lease
git push origin --delete feat/parent_branch
Claude Code Plugin Integration
When plugins are available, prefer plugin commands:
/code-review: Launches 4 parallel agents with confidence scoring (threshold 80)/commit-push-pr: Commits, pushes, and creates PR in one step- pr-review-toolkit agents: Specialized review via Task tool
code-reviewer- CLAUDE.md compliance, style, bugssilent-failure-hunter- Error handling issuespr-test-analyzer- Test coverage gaps
Plugin commands complement (not replace) manual gh workflows.
@smith-gh-cli/SKILL.md- GitHub CLI commands, pagination limits@smith-stacks/SKILL.md- Stacked PR workflows@smith-git/SKILL.md- Git operations, rebase@smith-style/SKILL.md- Conventional commits, branch naming@smith-tests/SKILL.md- Testing standards (pre-PR checklist)@smith-research/SKILL.md- Research best practices before implementing review feedback@smith-validation/SKILL.md- Debugging, root cause analysis for review issues
ACTION (Recency Zone)
Create PR:
gh pr create --title "feat: add feature" --body "..." --assignee @me
Merge PR:
gh pr merge {PR} --squash
Options: --squash, --merge, or --rebase
Post-merge cleanup:
git checkout main && git fetch --prune origin && git pull
git branch -d feat/my_feature
Check freshness:
git fetch origin
BEHIND=$(git rev-list HEAD..origin/main --count)
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon