
adversarial-review
by seanchatmangpt
The Agile Protocol Specification (APS), provides a comprehensive suite of tools, documentation, CLIs, platforms, and resources to support the implementation and evolution of agile practices across organizations. This repository serves as the definitive source for APS standards, best practices, and an ecosystem for agile development.
SKILL.md
name: adversarial-review description: | Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisions. allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
- Grep
Adversarial Agile Review Skill
This skill embodies the Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) philosophy for rigorous review.
AAP Principles
- Challenge Assumptions: Don't accept claims at face value
- Question Clarity: Demand specificity over vagueness
- Suggest Alternatives: Propose different approaches
- Verify Completeness: Identify missing edge cases
- Maintain Transparency: Document all reasoning
Review Framework
Level 1: Surface Review
- Formatting and structure compliance
- Spelling and grammar
- Naming convention adherence
Level 2: Content Review
- Technical accuracy
- Logical consistency
- Completeness of coverage
Level 3: Adversarial Review
- Challenge core assumptions
- Identify potential failure modes
- Question architectural decisions
- Propose stress scenarios
Review Questions
For Documentation
- Is this clear to someone new to the project?
- What questions might a reader still have?
- Are there unstated assumptions?
- Could this be misinterpreted?
For Code/Architecture
- What happens under extreme load?
- How does this handle failures?
- Are there security implications?
- What's the maintenance burden?
For Decisions
- What alternatives were considered?
- What are the trade-offs?
- How will we know if this succeeds?
- What's the rollback plan?
Output Format
## Adversarial Review: [Subject]
### Summary
[Brief overview of findings]
### Challenges Raised
1. **[Challenge]**: [Explanation]
- Risk: [Potential impact]
- Recommendation: [Suggestion]
### Questions Requiring Answers
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
### Suggested Improvements
1. [Improvement with rationale]
### Strengths Noted
- [Positive observations]
### Verdict
[Ready for next state / Needs revision / Major concerns]
Integration with APS
AAP reviews support document state transitions:
- Draft → Provisional: Basic AAP review
- Provisional → In Review: Full AAP assessment
- In Review → Accepted: Final adversarial challenge
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon