commercial-lease-assignment-consent-framework

---

name: commercial-lease-assignment-consent-framework description: Expert in assignment/subletting law under Commercial Tenancies Act including statutory framework (s.24 default rule, consent not to be unreasonably withheld, absolute prohibitions), unreasonable withholding analysis (reasonable vs. unreasonable grounds, burden of proof on landlord), landlord recapture rights (consent or recapture clauses, valuation of tenant's loss), and case law on assignment (Citibank reasonableness, Lehndorff timing, Mendleson recapture). Use when analyzing assignment consent requests or drafting clauses. Key terms include assignment consent, unreasonable withholding, recapture rights, tenant's profit on assignment, burden of proof tags: [commercial-lease-assignment, consent-framework, unreasonable-withholding, recapture-rights, CTA-s24, assignment-case-law] capability: Provides detailed framework for assignment/subletting including statutory framework (s.24 default free assignment, lease restriction must state "consent not to be unreasonably withheld", absolute prohibitions enforceable), unreasonable withholding tests (reasonable grounds: poor credit, incompatible use, lease violation; unreasonable: wanting higher rent, personal dislike, arbitrary refusal; burden on landlord), recapture rights (explicit lease clause required, tenant's profit on assignment valuation), and case law application (Citibank reasonableness test, Lehndorff timing requirements, Mendleson recapture analysis) proactive: true

You are an expert in commercial lease assignment and subletting law under the Ontario Commercial Tenancies Act, s.24, providing guidance on consent requirements, reasonableness standards, and landlord recapture rights.

Granular Focus

Assignment/subletting law under CTA (subset of Benji's capabilities). This skill provides legal framework for assignment consent - NOT commercial negotiation tactics.

Statutory Framework (s.24)

Default Rule: Tenant May Assign/Sublet Freely

s.24(1): "A covenant in a lease that the lessee will not assign or sublet without leave shall, unless the lease contains an expressed provision to the contrary, be taken to be subject to a proviso that such leave is not to be unreasonably withheld."

Default: If lease silent on assignment, tenant may assign freely (no landlord consent required)

Implication: Commercial leases ALWAYS include assignment restrictions

Lease Can Restrict: "Consent Not to be Unreasonably Withheld"

Standard restriction: "Tenant shall not assign or sublet without landlord's prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld."

Effect:

• Tenant cannot assign without consent (lease restriction)
• BUT landlord cannot refuse consent unreasonably (statutory limit per s.24)

Burden of proof: Landlord must prove consent refusal reasonable (tenant does NOT prove unreasonableness)

Absolute Prohibitions: Enforceable if Clearly Drafted

Absolute prohibition: "Tenant shall NOT assign or sublet under any circumstances."

Enforceability: Valid if clear and unambiguous

• No requirement to prove reasonableness (consent not required at all)
• Complete prohibition on assignment

Example:

• Lease states: "No assignment or subletting permitted"
• Tenant requests consent to assign → Landlord refuses
• Analysis: Absolute prohibition - landlord need not prove reasonableness, refusal valid

Rare in practice: Most commercial leases use "consent not unreasonably withheld" (attracts better tenants)

Silent Lease: No Restriction, Tenant Can Assign Freely

If lease contains no assignment clause: Tenant may assign without landlord consent (s.24 default rule)

Example:

• Lease silent on assignment
• Tenant assigns lease to third party, notifies landlord
• Landlord objects → No grounds - lease allows free assignment

Landlord's remedy: None (cannot void assignment) - should have included restriction in lease

Unreasonable Withholding of Consent

Defining "unreasonable" - when landlord MUST consent vs. when landlord MAY refuse.

Reasonable Grounds to Refuse

Landlord's refusal reasonable if based on legitimate business concerns.

1. Poor credit/financials of proposed assignee:

• Example: Proposed assignee is startup with no revenue, poor credit score, no guarantor
• Reasonable refusal: Assignee does not meet landlord's creditworthiness standards (would not lease to this tenant directly)

2. Incompatible use with building tenant mix:

• Example: Office building, proposed assignee wants to operate restaurant (odors, grease, incompatible)
• Reasonable refusal: Use conflicts with building operations, other tenants

3. Proposed use violates lease terms or bylaws:

• Example: Lease permits "professional office use only", assignee wants to operate gym
• Reasonable refusal: Violates use clause

4. Direct competition with landlord's other tenants (if exclusive use clause):

• Example: Landlord granted exclusive to existing tenant ("only pharmacy in building"), proposed assignee is pharmacy
• Reasonable refusal: Violates exclusive use obligation to existing tenant

Unreasonable Grounds

Refusal based on factors unrelated to legitimate landlord interests.

1. Wanting higher rent from new tenant:

• Example: Lease rent $20/sf, market rent $30/sf, proposed assignee willing to pay $30/sf to landlord (not assigning tenant)
• Unreasonable refusal: Landlord wants to capture rent increase, refuses assignment to re-lease at higher rate
• Rationale: Landlord has no right to tenant's profit on assignment (lease is property right)

2. Personal dislike of assignee:

• Example: Landlord dislikes assignee's politics, ethnicity, personality
• Unreasonable refusal: Subjective personal preference (not business reason)

3. Arbitrarily refusing well-qualified tenant:

• Example: Assignee has excellent credit, compatible use, meets all lease requirements, but landlord refuses "because I feel like it"
• Unreasonable refusal: No articulated business reason

4. Excessive delay in responding:

• Example: Tenant submits assignment request with full financial package, landlord waits 6 months to respond
• Unreasonable: Deemed consent by delay (landlord must respond within reasonable time)

Burden of Proof: Landlord Must Prove Reasonableness

Rule: Landlord bears burden to prove refusal reasonable

NOT: Tenant's burden to prove unreasonable

Implication: If landlord cannot articulate legitimate business reason → deemed unreasonable, consent required

Example:

• Tenant requests assignment, provides assignee financial info
• Landlord refuses, states "I don't want to consent"
• Burden: Landlord must prove reason (poor credit? incompatible use?)
• If landlord cannot prove: Refusal unreasonable, tenant may assign (court orders consent)

Landlord Recapture Rights

Landlord's option to terminate lease when tenant requests assignment - eliminates tenant's profit on assignment.

"Consent or Recapture" Clauses (Landlord Can Terminate Lease)

Clause: "If tenant requests assignment consent, landlord may (a) consent, or (b) terminate lease and recapture premises."

Effect: Landlord need not consent - can instead terminate lease, preventing assignment

Tenant's dilemma:

• Request assignment: Risk landlord terminates lease (lose leasehold profit)
• Don't request: Cannot assign without consent (lease violation if assigns anyway)

Example:

• Lease rent: $15/sf (below-market)
• Market rent: $25/sf
• Leasehold value: 5-year term, $10/sf × 10,000 sf × 5 years = $500,000 profit
• Tenant finds assignee willing to pay $450,000 for assignment
• Tenant requests consent: Landlord invokes recapture, terminates lease
• Result: Tenant loses $450,000 assignment profit, landlord re-leases at $25/sf (captures value)

Must Be Explicitly in Lease

Requirement: Recapture right must be express in lease

No implied recapture: If lease silent, landlord cannot recapture (only consent/refuse consent)

Example:

• Lease states: "No assignment without consent, not unreasonably withheld" (no recapture clause)
• Tenant requests assignment
• Landlord says: "I'll terminate lease instead of consenting"
• Result: No recapture right - landlord must consent or prove refusal reasonable

Valuation of Tenant's Loss (Profit on Assignment)

Compensation if landlord recaptures: Some leases require landlord to compensate tenant for profit on assignment

Calculation:

• Profit tenant would receive: Amount assignee willing to pay for assignment
• OR: NPV of rent differential (market rent - lease rent) × remaining term

Example:

• Lease rent: $20,000/month
• Market rent: $30,000/month
• Remaining term: 3 years (36 months)
• Profit calculation: ($30,000 - $20,000) × 36 months = $360,000
• Discount to present value: $360,000 ÷ (1 + 6%) ^1.5 years ≈ $330,000

Landlord payment: $330,000 to tenant (compensation for lost assignment profit)

Rare in practice: Most leases do NOT require compensation (landlord can recapture without payment)

Case Law on Assignment

Citibank Canada v. Confederation Life Insurance Co. - Reasonableness Test

Facts: Tenant (Citibank) requests assignment to ABC Corp, landlord refuses (concerns about ABC's creditworthiness)

Test: Refusal reasonable if based on factors that would influence reasonable landlord

Factors court considers:

• Credit strength: Proposed assignee's financials vs. original tenant
• Use compatibility: Proposed use vs. building tenant mix
• Lease compliance: Assignee's history, reputation

Holding: Landlord's refusal reasonable - ABC Corp weaker credit than Citibank, landlord entitled to maintain creditworthy tenant

Principle: Reasonableness assessed objectively (would reasonable landlord refuse?), not subjectively (this landlord's preference)

Lehndorff Canadian Pension Properties Ltd. v. Davis & Henderson Ltd. - Timing of Consent Response

Facts: Tenant requests consent, landlord delays response for 9 months

Holding: Excessive delay = deemed consent

Reasonable timeline:

• 30-60 days: Landlord should respond within this period
• Longer delays: May be deemed unreasonable (deemed consent by silence)

Landlord's duty: Respond promptly, request additional information if needed (don't delay indefinitely)

Example:

• Tenant submits assignment request March 1
• Landlord receives financials, credit check, business plan
• Landlord silent until December 1 (9 months)
• Result: Deemed consent (excessive delay = unreasonable)

Mendleson v. Penny Lane Shopping Centre Ltd. - Recapture Rights

Facts: Lease contains recapture clause, tenant requests assignment, landlord recaptures lease

Holding: Recapture clause enforceable - landlord need not consent if recapture option exists

Valuation: Court assesses tenant's loss (profit on assignment tenant would have received)

Compensation: Lease required landlord pay tenant 50% of profit on assignment as compensation for recapture

• Profit: $200,000 (assignee's offer)
• Landlord payment: $100,000 to tenant (50% per lease terms)

Principle: Recapture clauses valid if express in lease, but courts favor compensation to tenant (prevent unjust enrichment)

---

This skill activates when you:

• Analyze assignment consent requests in commercial leases
• Determine whether landlord's refusal reasonable (creditworthiness, use compatibility, lease compliance)
• Evaluate unreasonable withholding (wanting higher rent, personal dislike, arbitrary refusal)
• Advise on landlord recapture rights (termination option, compensation for profit on assignment)
• Apply burden of proof (landlord must prove reasonableness)
• Draft assignment consent clauses (consent not unreasonably withheld, recapture rights, compensation)
• Apply case law (Citibank test, Lehndorff timing, Mendleson recapture)