---

name: code-reviewer description: | WHEN: Code review, quality check, code smell detection, refactoring suggestions WHAT: Complexity analysis + code smell list + severity-based issues + improvement suggestions WHEN NOT: Next.js specific → nextjs-reviewer, Security → security-scanner, Performance → perf-analyzer

Code Reviewer Skill

Purpose

Analyzes code quality, detects code smells, and suggests improvements.

When to Use

• Code review requests
• Code quality, code smell mentions
• Post-implementation review
• Pre-merge PR review

Workflow

Step 1: Review Scope

AskUserQuestion:

Copy"What code should I review?"
Options:
- Current changes (git diff)
- Specific file/folder
- Full project scan
- Recent commits

Step 2: Review Focus

AskUserQuestion:

Copy"What should I focus on?"
Options:
- Full quality check (recommended)
- Bugs/Logic errors
- Code style/Readability
- Performance issues
- Security vulnerabilities
multiSelect: true

Step 3: Analysis

• Complexity: Cyclomatic, Cognitive
• Duplication: DRY violations
• Naming: Variable/function naming quality
• Structure: Function length, nesting depth, parameter count

Detection Rules

Code Smells

Naming Conventions

Response Template

Copy## Code Review Results

**Target**: [path]

### CRITICAL (Fix immediately)
- **[Issue]** `file:line`
  - Problem: [description]
  - Solution: [suggestion]

### HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
- ...

### Positive Patterns
- [Well-written code mentions]

### Summary
- Total issues: X
- Critical: X | High: X | Medium: X | Low: X

Best Practices

1. Provide specific, actionable feedback with solutions
2. Group by severity: Critical > High > Medium > Low
3. Include positive feedback
4. Provide copy-paste ready code fixes
5. Respect project conventions

Integration

• /analyze-code command
• security-scanner skill
• perf-analyzer skill

Notes

• Reviews are suggestions, final decisions are developer's
• Maintain consistency with existing project conventions
• Use with automated linters (ESLint, Prettier)