Back to list
outfitter-dev

pattern-analysis

by outfitter-dev

Rules files & configurations for agents

17🍴 0📅 Jan 23, 2026

SKILL.md


name: pattern-analysis version: 1.0.0 description: This skill should be used when recognizing recurring themes, codifying best practices, extracting reusable workflows, or when "pattern", "recurring", or "repeated" are mentioned.

Pattern Analysis

Identify signals → classify patterns → validate with evidence → document for reuse.

<when_to_use>

  • Recognizing recurring themes in work or data
  • Codifying best practices from experience
  • Extracting workflows from repeated success
  • Identifying anti-patterns from repeated failures
  • Building decision frameworks from observations

NOT for: single occurrences, unvalidated hunches, premature abstraction

</when_to_use>

<signal_identification>

Watch for these signal categories:

CategoryWatch ForIndicates
SuccessCompletion, positive feedback, repetition, efficiencyPattern worth codifying
FrustrationBacktracking, clarification loops, rework, confusionAnti-pattern to document
WorkflowSequence consistency, decision points, quality gatesProcess pattern
OrchestrationMulti-component coordination, state management, routingCoordination pattern

See signal-types.md for detailed taxonomy.

</signal_identification>

<pattern_classification>

Four primary pattern types:

TypeCharacteristicsUse When
WorkflowSequential phases, clear transitions, quality gatesProcess has ordered steps
OrchestrationCoordinates components, manages state, routes workMultiple actors involved
HeuristicCondition → action mapping, context-sensitiveRepeated decisions
Anti-PatternCommon mistake, causes rework, has better alternativePreventing failures

See pattern-types.md for templates and examples.

</pattern_classification>

<evidence_thresholds>

Codification Criteria

Don't codify after first occurrence. Require:

  • 3+ instances — minimum repetition to establish pattern
  • Multiple contexts — works across different scenarios
  • Clear boundaries — know when to apply vs not apply
  • Measurable benefit — improves outcome compared to ad-hoc approach

Quality Indicators

Strong PatternWeak Pattern
Consistent structureVaries each use
Transferable to othersRequires specific expertise
Handles edge casesBreaks on deviation
Saves time/effortOverhead exceeds value

</evidence_thresholds>

<progressive_formalization>

Observation (1-2 instances):

  • Note for future reference
  • "This worked well, watch for recurrence"

Hypothesis (3+ instances):

  • Draft informal guideline
  • Test consciously in next case

Codification (validated pattern):

  • Create formal documentation
  • Include examples and constraints

Refinement (ongoing):

  • Update based on usage
  • Add edge cases

</progressive_formalization>

Loop: Observe → Classify → Validate → Document

  1. Collect signals — note successes, failures, recurring behaviors
  2. Classify pattern type — workflow, orchestration, heuristic, anti-pattern
  3. Check evidence threshold — 3+ instances? Multiple contexts?
  4. Extract quality criteria — what makes it work?
  5. Document pattern — name, when, what, why
  6. Test deliberately — apply consciously, track variance
  7. Refine — adjust based on feedback

ALWAYS:

  • Require 3+ instances before codifying
  • Validate across multiple contexts
  • Document both when to use AND when not to
  • Include concrete examples
  • Track pattern effectiveness over time

NEVER:

  • Codify after single occurrence
  • Abstract without evidence
  • Ignore context-sensitivity
  • Skip validation step
  • Assume transferability without testing

Deep-dive documentation:

Related skills:

Score

Total Score

60/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon