---

name: peer-review-template description: Structured peer review for analytical work. Use when reviewing teammates' analysis, providing constructive feedback, or establishing analysis quality standards.

Peer Review Template

Quick Start

This skill helps you structured peer review for analytical work.

Context Requirements

Before proceeding, I need:

1. Work to review: Key information needed for this analysis
2. Review template: Key information needed for this analysis
3. Review process: Key information needed for this analysis
4. Feedback standards: Key information needed for this analysis

Context Gathering

If any required context is missing from our conversation, I'll ask for it using these prompts:

For Work to review:

"To proceed with peer review template, I need to understand work to review.

Please provide:

• [Specific detail 1 about work to review]
• [Specific detail 2 about work to review]
• [Optional context that would help]"

For Review template:

"To proceed with peer review template, I need to understand review template.

Please provide:

• [Specific detail 1 about review template]
• [Specific detail 2 about review template]
• [Optional context that would help]"

For Review process:

"To proceed with peer review template, I need to understand review process.

Please provide:

• [Specific detail 1 about review process]
• [Specific detail 2 about review process]
• [Optional context that would help]"

Handling Partial Context

If you can only provide some of the context:

• I'll proceed with what's available and note limitations
• I'll use industry standard defaults where appropriate
• I'll ask clarifying questions as needed during the analysis

Workflow

Step 1: Validate Context

Before starting, I'll confirm:

• All required context is available or has reasonable defaults
• The scope and objectives are clear
• Expected outputs align with your needs

Step 2: Execute Core Analysis

Following best practices for peer review template, I'll:

1. Initial assessment - Review provided context and data
2. Systematic execution - Follow structured methodology
3. Quality checks - Validate intermediate results
4. Progressive disclosure - Share findings at logical checkpoints

Step 3: Synthesize Findings

I'll present results in a clear, actionable format:

• Key findings prioritized by importance
• Supporting evidence and visualizations
• Recommendations with implementation guidance
• Limitations and assumptions documented

Step 4: Iterate Based on Feedback

After presenting initial findings:

• Address questions and dive deeper where needed
• Refine analysis based on your feedback
• Provide additional context or alternative approaches

Context Validation

Before executing the full workflow, I verify:

• Context is sufficient for meaningful analysis
• No contradictions in provided information
• Scope is well-defined and achievable
• Expected outputs are clear

Output Template

CopyPeer Review Template Analysis
Generated: [timestamp]

## Context Summary
- [Key context item 1]
- [Key context item 2]
- [Key context item 3]

## Methodology
[Brief description of approach taken]

## Key Findings
1. **Finding 1**: [Observation] - [Implication]
2. **Finding 2**: [Observation] - [Implication]
3. **Finding 3**: [Observation] - [Implication]

## Detailed Analysis
[In-depth analysis with supporting evidence]

## Recommendations
1. **Recommendation 1**: [Action] - [Expected outcome]
2. **Recommendation 2**: [Action] - [Expected outcome]

## Limitations & Assumptions
- [Limitation or assumption 1]
- [Limitation or assumption 2]

## Next Steps
1. [Suggested follow-up action 1]
2. [Suggested follow-up action 2]

Common Context Gaps & Solutions

Scenario: User requests peer review template without providing context → Response: "I can help with peer review template! To provide the most relevant analysis, I need [key context items]. Can you share [specific ask]?"

Scenario: Partial context provided → Response: "I have [available context]. I'll proceed with [what's possible] and will note where additional context would improve the analysis."

Scenario: Unclear objectives
→ Response: "To ensure my analysis meets your needs, can you clarify: What decisions will this inform? What format would be most useful?"

Scenario: Domain-specific terminology → Response: "I want to make sure I understand your terminology correctly. When you say [term], do you mean [interpretation]?"

Advanced Options

Once basic analysis is complete, I can offer:

• Deeper investigation - Drill into specific findings
• Alternative approaches - Different analytical lenses
• Sensitivity analysis - Test key assumptions
• Comparative analysis - Benchmark against alternatives
• Visualization options - Different ways to present findings

Just ask if you'd like to explore any of these directions!

Integration with Other Skills

This skill works well in combination with:

• [Related skill 1] - for [complementary analysis]
• [Related skill 2] - for [next step in workflow]
• [Related skill 3] - for [alternative perspective]

Let me know if you'd like to chain multiple analyses together.