Back to list
lhl

extract

by lhl

1🍴 0📅 Jan 25, 2026

SKILL.md


name: extract description: "Extract claims from a source without performing full 3-stage analysis. Use for quick claim harvesting or supporting sources."

Quick Claim Extraction (Codex)

Extract claims from a source without performing full 3-stage analysis. Use for quick claim harvesting or supporting sources.

Invocation

$extract <source>

Note: Codex reserves /... for built-in commands. Use $extract instead.

Extract claims from a source without performing full 3-stage analysis. Use for quick claim harvesting or when sources are supporting evidence rather than primary subjects.

When to Use

  • Quick extraction of claims from supporting sources
  • Building cross-reference evidence for existing claims
  • Initial triage before deciding on full analysis
  • Sources that are data-heavy rather than argument-heavy

Output Format

claims:
  - id: "DOMAIN-YYYY-NNN"
    text: "[Precise claim statement]"
    type: "[F/T/H/P/A/C/S/X]"
    domain: "[DOMAIN]"
    evidence_level: "E[1-6]"
    credence: 0.XX
    source_ids: ["[source-id]"]

Claim Types

TypeSymbolDefinition
Fact[F]Empirically verified, consensus reality
Theory[T]Coherent explanatory framework with empirical support
Hypothesis[H]Testable proposition, awaiting evidence
Prediction[P]Future-oriented claim with specified conditions
Assumption[A]Underlying premise (stated or unstated)
Counterfactual[C]Alternative scenario for comparison
Speculation[S]Unfalsifiable or untestable claim
Contradiction[X]Identified logical inconsistency

Evidence Hierarchy

Use this hierarchy to rate strength of evidential support for claims.

LevelStrengthDescriptionCredence Range
E1Strong EmpiricalSystematic review, meta-analysis, replicated experiments0.9-1.0
E2Moderate EmpiricalSingle peer-reviewed study, official statistics0.6-0.8
E3Strong TheoreticalExpert consensus, working papers, preprints0.5-0.7
E4Weak TheoreticalIndustry reports, credible journalism0.3-0.5
E5Opinion/ForecastPersonal observation, anecdote, expert opinion0.2-0.4
E6UnsupportedPure speculation, unfalsifiable claims0.0-0.2

Domain Codes

CodeDescription
TECHTechnology, AI capabilities, tech trajectories
LABOREmployment, automation, human work
ECONValue theory, pricing, distribution, ownership
GOVGovernance, policy, regulation
SOCSocial structures, culture, behavior
RESOURCEScarcity, abundance, allocation
TRANSTransition dynamics, pathways
GEOInternational relations, state competition
INSTInstitutions, organizations
RISKRisk assessment, failure modes
METAClaims about the framework/analysis itself

Notes

  • Quick extractions should be labeled with Analysis Depth: quick in the analysis file
  • Minimum requirements: Metadata, Legends, Claim Summary table, Claims YAML
  • Full Stage 2 evaluation tables (verification, counterevidence, tensions, persuasion) are optional for quick extractions
  • If a source proves more significant, upgrade to full analysis with $check --continue

  • $check
  • $analyze

Score

Total Score

60/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon