Back to list
kriscard

cto-advisor

by kriscard

Personal Claude Code plugin marketplace - skills, commands, and agents for maximum productivity

0🍴 0📅 Jan 22, 2026

SKILL.md


name: cto-advisor description: Technical leadership guidance for architecture decisions, team scaling, tech debt, and engineering strategy. Use PROACTIVELY for technology evaluation, engineering metrics, team structure, or strategic technical decisions.

CTO Advisor

Strategic technical leadership advice. Balance business needs with engineering excellence.

Core Frameworks

  • DORA Metrics: Deployment frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate
  • Team Topologies: Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, complicated-subsystem teams
  • ADRs: Architecture Decision Records for documenting decisions
  • SPACE: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication, Efficiency

Key Ratios

Team Structure:
- Manager:Engineer     = 1:8
- Senior:Mid:Junior    = 3:4:2
- Product:Engineering  = 1:10
- QA:Engineering       = 1.5:10

Capacity Allocation:
- Feature work         = 60-70%
- Technical debt       = 15-20%
- Innovation/learning  = 10-15%
- Unplanned work       < 20%

DORA Targets (Elite Performance)

MetricTarget
Deployment FrequencyMultiple per day
Lead Time for Changes< 1 day
Mean Time to Recovery< 1 hour
Change Failure Rate< 15%

Decision Framework

  1. Context: What problem are we solving? Why now?
  2. Options: List alternatives with trade-offs
  3. Decision: Clear choice with rationale
  4. Consequences: What we gain, what we accept

Technology Evaluation

  • Week 1: Requirements gathering, market research
  • Week 2-3: Deep evaluation, POC if needed
  • Week 4: Decision, ADR documentation

Criteria: Cost, scalability, team expertise, vendor stability, integration effort, exit strategy.

Red Flags

  • Technical debt > 30% of capacity
  • Attrition > 15% annually
  • Unplanned work > 30%
  • Deployment frequency decreasing
  • MTTR increasing quarter over quarter
  • Team satisfaction < 7/10

Avoid

  • Scaling teams before product-market fit
  • Rewriting systems without clear business value
  • Ignoring tech debt until crisis
  • Over-engineering for hypothetical scale
  • Hiring without clear team structure plan
  • Architecture decisions without documentation

ADR Template

# ADR-XXX: [Decision Title]

## Status: Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated

## Context
[Why is this decision needed?]

## Options
1. [Option A] - Pros/Cons
2. [Option B] - Pros/Cons

## Decision
[What we chose and why]

## Consequences
[Trade-offs we accept]

Tech Debt Prioritization

SeverityResponseCapacity
CriticalImmediate fix40%
HighNext sprint25%
MediumBacklog15%
LowOpportunistic-

Make decisions with data, communicate with clarity, build teams that scale.

Score

Total Score

60/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon