← Back to list

code-review-checklist
by htooayelwinict
⭐ 0🍴 0📅 Jan 24, 2026
SKILL.md
name: code-review-checklist description: | Review code changes for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability. Use for PR reviews, code audits, pre-merge checks, or quality validation of Laravel + React + Python code. EXCLUSIVE to reviewer agent. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp_gemini-bridge, mcp_open-bridge, mcp_codex-bridge, mcp_context7
Code Review Checklist
Exclusive to: reviewer agent
MCP Helpers (Brain + Memory)
🧠 Gemini-Bridge — Deep Code Analysis
mcp_gemini-bridge_consult_gemini(query="Review this code for best practices, security, and performance: [code snippet]", directory=".")
🌉 Open-Bridge — Alternative Analysis
mcp_open-bridge_consult_gemini(query="Review this code for best practices, security, and performance: [code snippet]", directory=".")
💻 Codex-Bridge — Code-Focused Review
mcp_codex-bridge_consult_codex(query="Analyze this code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements: [code]", directory=".")
📚 Context7 (Memory) — Up-to-Date Docs
Lookup best practices and anti-patterns:
mcp_context7_resolve-library-id(libraryName="[library]", query="best practices")
mcp_context7_query-docs(libraryId="/[resolved-id]", query="[specific pattern to validate]")
Validation Loop (MANDATORY)
Before completing any review, verify the codebase passes all checks:
composer test # All PHP tests pass
npm run types # No TypeScript errors
npm run lint # No linting errors
./vendor/bin/pint --test # PHP style OK
Report any failures as Critical findings.
Instructions
- Review against project standards in
docs/code-standards.md - Run through the checklist below
- Report issues by severity (Critical → Warning → Suggestion)
Review Checklist
✅ Correctness
- Logic handles edge cases
- Error handling is appropriate
- Types are correct (no
anyunless justified) - Tests cover new/changed behavior
- No dead code or unused imports
🔒 Security (OWASP)
- No secrets or credentials in code
- User input validated and sanitized
- Authorization checks in place
- No SQL injection (use Eloquent/query builder)
- No XSS (proper escaping, sanitization)
- CSRF protection enabled
- Rate limiting considered
⚡ Performance
- No N+1 queries (use eager loading:
with()) - No unnecessary database calls
- Large datasets are paginated
- Indexes exist for filtered/joined columns
🧹 Maintainability
- Follows patterns in
docs/code-standards.md - Names are clear and consistent
- No unnecessary complexity
- DRY — no copy-paste duplication
🎨 Frontend
- Uses existing shadcn/ui components
- Loading and error states handled
- Accessible (keyboard, labels, contrast)
- Responsive (mobile + desktop)
📝 Documentation
- Code comments for non-obvious logic
- Docs updated if behavior changed
- Types documented with JSDoc if complex
Laravel Security Checks
| Check | Verify |
|---|---|
| Mass assignment | $fillable or $guarded defined |
| Authorization | Policy or Gate used |
| Validation | FormRequest with rules |
| CSRF | @csrf in forms |
| SQL injection | No raw queries with user input |
React Security Checks
| Check | Verify |
|---|---|
| XSS | No dangerouslySetInnerHTML |
| Props | TypeScript interfaces used |
| Secrets | No sensitive data in client |
Severity Guide
| Level | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🚨 Critical | Security flaw, data loss, breaks functionality | Block merge |
| ⚠️ Warning | Performance issue, code smell, missing test | Request fix |
| 💡 Suggestion | Style improvement, better pattern | Optional |
Output Format
## 🔍 Review Summary
[One paragraph overview]
## 🚨 Critical (must fix)
1. [Issue]: [File:Line] — [Why critical]
## ⚠️ Warnings (should fix)
1. [Issue]: [File:Line] — [Recommendation]
## 💡 Suggestions (nice to have)
1. [Suggestion]: [File:Line] — [Improvement]
## ✅ What's Good
- [Positive observation]
Examples
- "Review this PR before merge"
- "Check this code for security issues"
- "Audit changes for performance"
Score
Total Score
45/100
Based on repository quality metrics
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
○LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
0/10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
○言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
0/5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
Reviews
💬
Reviews coming soon