SKILL.md

name: requesting-code-reviews description: AI agent requests effective code reviews through proper preparation, clear descriptions, and appropriate reviewer selection. Use when creating PRs, requesting feedback, or submitting for review.

Requesting Code Reviews

Quick Start

Self-Review - Review your own diff first, catch obvious issues
Prepare Code - Tests pass, no debug code, documentation updated
Write Description - Clear summary, changes list, testing info, screenshots
Select Reviewers - Match expertise to changes, respect workload
Time Appropriately - Early week, morning hours, avoid Fridays

Features

Feature	Description	Guide
Self-Review	Catch issues before requesting	Check debug code, TODOs, test coverage
PR Description	Guide reviewers effectively	Summary, changes, testing, attention areas
Reviewer Selection	Match expertise to needs	Code owner, domain expert, security reviewer
PR Sizing	Optimal size for review quality	<400 lines ideal, split larger PRs
Timing	When to request reviews	Morning, early week, check availability
Reviewer Guidance	Help reviewers focus	Key areas, skip suggestions, questions

Common Patterns

# PR Description Template
## Summary
[What changed and why - 2-3 sentences]
Resolves #123

## Changes
- [Bullet point each significant change]

## Testing
### Automated Tests
- [x] Unit tests added/updated
- [x] Integration tests pass

### Manual Testing
1. [Step to verify]
2. [Expected result]

## Screenshots
[For UI changes]

## Areas Needing Review
- Security: [specific file/concern]
- Performance: [specific concern]

## Checklist
- [x] Self-review completed
- [x] Tests pass locally
- [x] Documentation updated

# PR Size Guide
| Size | Lines | Review Time | Recommendation |
|------|-------|-------------|----------------|
| Small | <100 | 15-30 min | Ideal for quality review |
| Medium | <400 | 30-60 min | Acceptable |
| Large | <800 | 1-2 hours | Consider splitting |
| Too Large | 800+ | 2+ hours | Split required |

# Reviewer Selection
1. Code owner - maintains affected area
2. Domain expert - knows the technology
3. Security - for auth/crypto changes
4. Architecture - for design changes

Max reviewers: 4 (too many = diffused responsibility)

# Self-Review Checklist
[ ] No console.log/debug statements
[ ] No commented-out code
[ ] No hardcoded values (should be config)
[ ] Error handling appropriate
[ ] All tests pass
[ ] New code has tests
[ ] Complex logic has comments
[ ] Commit messages clear
[ ] Rebased on latest main

Best Practices

Do	Avoid
Self-review first	Submitting PRs without testing
Keep PRs small (<400 lines)	Creating massive PRs
Write clear descriptions	Leaving descriptions empty
Highlight key review areas	Expecting reviewers to find everything
Choose reviewers wisely	Overloading single reviewers
Be responsive to feedback	Ignoring reviewer availability
Include screenshots for UI	Rushing reviewers
Test thoroughly first	Wasting reviewer time on broken code

receiving-code-reviews - Handle feedback professionally
finishing-development-branches - Complete PR preparation
verifying-before-completion - Pre-submission verification
writing-plans - Plan review-ready deliverables

Score

Total Score

60/100

Based on repository quality metrics

✓SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20

✓LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10

○説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10

○人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15

○最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10

○フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5

✓Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5

✓言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5

○タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon

requesting-code-reviews