---

name: Systematic Type Migration description: Safe refactoring workflow for replacing old types with new type-safe implementations through integration-test-first, file-by-file migration with incremental verification when_to_use: when refactoring to new type-safe implementations, replacing components across codebase, migrating to new domain types version: 1.0.0

Systematic Type Migration

Overview

When refactoring components to new type-safe implementations, use this systematic workflow to prevent "works in isolation but broken integration" bugs.

Core principle: Integration test FIRST → file-by-file migration → incremental verification → cleanup

The Problem

Recurring issue during major refactoring:

• Old component definitions remain in the codebase
• Some files spawn entities with old types
• Other files query for new types
• Systems become disconnected (queries find zero entities)
• User functionality breaks despite all systems being "properly registered"

Example: After introducing type-safe MovementState enum, if setup.rs spawns entities with the old MovementState but planning.rs queries for the new MovementState, queries will silently fail.

The Workflow

Phase 1: Preparation

Step 1: Document the change

• Create work directory (e.g., docs/work/YYYY-MM-DD-type-safe-X)
• Document scope and goals

Step 2: Identify all uses

Copy# Find all references to the type being replaced
grep -r "ComponentName" src/
rg "OldType" --type rust

Step 3: Create integration test FIRST

• Write test that exercises full user flow (not just isolated system behavior)
• Test should verify end-to-end functionality
• This test MUST pass before starting AND after completion

Step 4: Run baseline tests

• Run project test command
• Run project check command
• Capture baseline to compare against

Phase 2: Implementation

Step 1: Create new component

• Implement in canonical location (e.g., src/components/movement/states.rs)
• Include all required derives

Step 2: Do NOT delete old component yet

• Keep both during migration
• Enables gradual migration without breaking everything
• Allows atomic commits per file

Phase 3: Migration (Systematic, File-by-File)

For EACH file using the old component:

Step 1: Update imports

Copy// Before
use old_module::OldType;

// After
use new_module::NewType;

Step 2: Update type usage

• Pattern matching if enum variants changed
• Entity spawning to use new type
• Queries to use new type

Step 3: Test after each file

Copycargo check  # Or language-specific quick check

• Catch type errors immediately
• Don't accumulate errors across files

Step 4: Commit atomically

Copygit add path/to/file.rs
git commit -m "refactor: migrate FileX to new ComponentName"

• One commit per file or logical group
• Enables easy rollback if needed

Common file locations to check:

• Entity spawning files (e.g., setup.rs, spawners.rs)
• System logic files (business logic using the component)
• UI display files (rendering component state)
• Component definition files
• Integration test files

Phase 4: Cleanup

Step 1: Delete old component definition

• Remove from original module
• Only after ALL references migrated

Step 2: Remove obsolete imports

Copy# Find unused imports
cargo clippy -- -W unused_imports

Step 3: Remove obsolete helper code

• Builder functions
• Conversion utilities
• Deprecated APIs

Step 4: Update exports

• Remove old type from mod.rs public API
• Ensure new type properly exported

Phase 5: Verification

Step 1: Compile clean

Copycargo check --all-targets
# Or language-specific equivalent

Step 2: Run all tests

Run project test command

• All unit tests must pass
• All integration tests must pass

Step 3: Verify integration test passes

• The test created in Phase 1 MUST pass
• This verifies end-to-end functionality

Step 4: Run checks

Run project check command

• Linting, formatting, type checking

Step 5: Manual testing

• Test actual user flows
• Verify UI updates correctly
• Check edge cases

Phase 6: Documentation

Step 1: Update pattern docs

• If new pattern emerged, document it

Step 2: Document in retrospective

• Capture lessons learned in work directory
• Note any pitfalls encountered

Step 3: Update project docs

• If pattern is important, reference from CLAUDE.md or README

Key Principles

Prevention: Integration Tests

The best prevention is integration tests that verify the full user flow, not just isolated system behavior.

What Makes a Good Integration Test

Good integration test:

Copy#[test]
fn test_user_can_move_vehicle() {
    // Setup: Spawn entities with realistic component combinations
    let world = setup_test_world();
    let vehicle = spawn_vehicle_with_all_components(&mut world);

    // Act: Trigger user action (click → select → move)
    click_vehicle(&mut world, vehicle);
    issue_move_order(&mut world, target_position);

    // Assert: Verify end result, not internal state
    run_systems_until_complete(&mut world);
    assert!(vehicle_arrived_at_target(&world, vehicle));
}

Bad integration test:

Copy#[test]
fn test_planning_system_queries() {
    // Only tests one system in isolation
    // Doesn't verify components are actually compatible
}

Integration test should:

• Spawn entities with ALL required components (like real usage)
• Exercise multiple systems together (full pipeline)
• Verify user-visible outcome, not internal state
• Use realistic component combinations

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Skipping Integration Test

Problem: Discover breakage during manual testing (too late) Solution: Write integration test FIRST, watch it pass LAST

Mistake 2: Big-Bang Migration

Problem: Migrate all files at once, giant debug session when it fails Solution: File-by-file with cargo check after each

Mistake 3: Deleting Old Type Too Early

Problem: Can't compile during migration, hard to debug Solution: Keep both until migration complete

Mistake 4: Batching Commits

Problem: Hard to identify which change broke tests Solution: Atomic commits per file

Mistake 5: Testing Only Units

Problem: Units pass, integration broken (components incompatible) Solution: Integration test MUST exercise full user flow

Example Workflow

Copy# Phase 1: Preparation
mkdir -p docs/work/2025-10-23-type-safe-movement-state
grep -r "MovementState" src/ > docs/work/2025-10-23-type-safe-movement-state/references.txt
# Write integration test: tests/movement_integration.rs
# Run project test command to establish baseline

# Phase 2: Implementation
# Create src/components/movement/states.rs with new MovementState
# Keep old src/space/components.rs::MovementState

# Phase 3: Migration (file-by-file)
# File 1: src/space/systems/setup.rs
nvim src/space/systems/setup.rs  # Update import, spawning
cargo check  # Verify
git add src/space/systems/setup.rs
git commit -m "refactor: migrate setup.rs to new MovementState"

# File 2: src/space/systems/planning.rs
nvim src/space/systems/planning.rs  # Update import, queries
cargo check  # Verify
git add src/space/systems/planning.rs
git commit -m "refactor: migrate planning.rs to new MovementState"

# ... repeat for each file ...

# Phase 4: Cleanup
# Delete old MovementState from src/space/components.rs
git add src/space/components.rs
git commit -m "refactor: remove old MovementState definition"

# Phase 5: Verification
cargo check --all-targets
# Run project test command - integration test MUST pass
# Run project check command
# Manual testing

# Phase 6: Documentation
# Write docs/work/2025-10-23-type-safe-movement-state/summary.md

Related Practices

Before using this skill:

• Read: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}principles/development.md - Code structure principles
• Read: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}principles/testing.md - Testing principles

After migration:

• Use: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md - Request code review

Testing This Skill

See test-scenarios.md for pressure tests validating this workflow prevents integration breakage.