---

name: orchestrate-agent-clis description: > Execute and orchestrate multiple AI agent CLIs (Gemini, Codex, Cursor, Claude Code) for getting alternative opinions, comparing approaches, or leveraging different AI models' strengths. Use when the user explicitly mentions agent names like "ask gemini", "ask cursor", "ask codex", "use composer", "try grok", or when needing diverse perspectives on complex problems, alternative implementation approaches, or multi-agent collaboration.

Orchestrate Agent CLIs

Execute different AI agent CLIs to get alternative perspectives, compare approaches, or leverage specific model strengths.

Available CLIs

Gemini

Copygemini -p "<prompt>"

Has internet access. Good for research and current information.

Codex

Copycodex exec "<prompt>"

No internet access. Fast, focused on code generation.

Claude Code

Copyclaude -p "<prompt>"

Full-featured Claude agent with tool access.

Cursor Agent

Copycursor-agent --model=MODEL -p "<prompt>"

Available models:

• composer-1 (preferred for multi-file edits, also fast)
• gemini-3-pro (better for code investigation, planning and web research)
• gemini-3-flash (faster, good for simple tasks)
• grok (creative solutions, unconventional approaches)
• gpt-5.2-codex (code-focused)

Note: If these models fail, you can get the list of available models by running:

Copycursor-agent models

File References

Reference files using @ prefix with relative paths:

Copycodex exec "Review @src/components/Button.tsx"
gemini -p "Create tests for @src/utils/helpers.ts"
cursor-agent --model=composer-1 -p "Refactor @src/api/client.ts"

Task Guidelines

Read-Only Tasks

For questions, plans, reviews, or analysis, instruct agents not to make file changes:

Copycursor-agent --model=gemini-3-pro -p "Analyze the architecture in @src/core/ - explain only, do not modify files"

Comparison Workflows

Get multiple perspectives on the same problem:

Copy# Get Gemini's opinion first
gemini -p "How would you implement feature X?"

# Then compare with Codex
codex exec "How would you implement feature X?"