
atlas-quick
by ajstack22
SKILL.md
name: atlas-quick description: Quick 2-phase workflow for trivial changes - typos, colors, config updates (5-15 min)
Atlas Quick Workflow
When to Use This Skill
Perfect for:
- UI text changes (typos, copy updates)
- Color/style tweaks (single value changes)
- Simple configuration updates
- Documentation fixes
- Single-line bug fixes
Time estimate: 5-15 minutes
Success criteria:
- Change deployed in < 15 minutes
- Tests pass
- No rollbacks
The 2 Phases
Phase 1: Make Change → Locate, change, verify
Phase 2: Deploy → Test + deploy via your deployment process
Phase 1: Make Change
Goal: Locate the code, make the change, verify locally.
Steps:
-
Locate the code
# Find file by name find src/ -name "*filename*" # Find file by content grep -r "text to find" src/ -
Make the change
- Update the single value/line
- Keep it simple - if it's getting complex, escalate to Iterative or Standard
-
Verify locally
- If UI change: Check visually
- If config: Verify value makes sense
- If text: Check for typos
Quick Workflow Rules:
DO:
- ✅ Make ONE focused change
- ✅ Verify change is visible/working
- ✅ Keep it under 5 minutes
DON'T:
- ❌ Change multiple unrelated things
- ❌ Add new logic
- ❌ Modify multiple files
- ❌ Skip verification
Project-Specific Considerations:
Even for quick changes, follow your project conventions:
Check for .atlas/conventions.md:
If your project has this file, review relevant sections:
- Field naming conventions
- Code style requirements
- Design system rules
- Platform-specific gotchas
Common conventions to verify:
// Example: Field naming (customize for your project)
// ✅ Use project's standard field names
user.displayName = "John"
// ❌ Don't use deprecated field names
user.username = "John" // If your project prefers displayName
// Example: Colors (customize for your project)
// ✅ Use project's color system
color: theme.colors.primary
// ❌ Don't use hard-coded colors if project has theme system
color: '#007AFF'
// Example: Typography (customize for your project)
// ✅ Use project's typography component
<Typography variant="body">Hello</Typography>
// ⚠️ Acceptable for quick change if no typography system
<Text style={{ fontFamily: 'System' }}>Hello</Text>
Examples:
Example 1: Fix typo
// Before
<Text>Wellcome to our app</Text>
// After
<Text>Welcome to our app</Text>
Example 2: Change color
// Before
backgroundColor: '#0000FF' // Bright blue
// After
backgroundColor: '#007AFF' // iOS blue
Example 3: Update timeout
// Before
const API_TIMEOUT = 30000 // 30 seconds
// After
const API_TIMEOUT = 60000 // 60 seconds
Phase 2: Deploy
Goal: Run tests and deploy via your deployment process.
Steps:
-
Update your changelog/release notes
If your project uses a changelog file (e.g.,
CHANGELOG.md,PENDING_CHANGES.md):## Title: Fix welcome message typo ### Changes Made: - Fixed typo: "Wellcome" → "Welcome" -
Run quick validation
Adjust commands based on your project:
# Type checking (if using TypeScript) npm run typecheck # OR tsc --noEmit # Linting (if configured) npm run lint # OR eslint src/ # If tests are fast enough, run them npm test -
Deploy using your project's deployment script
Replace with your actual deployment command:
# Examples (use your project's command): npm run deploy:dev # OR ./scripts/deploy.sh dev # OR make deploy-dev # OR git push origin develop
Deployment Checklist:
Pre-deployment:
- Changelog/release notes updated (if applicable)
- Type checking passes (if applicable)
- Linting passes (if applicable)
- Change verified locally
Deployment:
- Use your project's deployment script (not manual commit)
- Deploy to dev/staging environment first
- Check deployment output for errors
Post-deployment:
- No errors in deployment output
- Change visible in deployed environment
- Tests pass (if run by deployment script)
When to Skip Tests:
For truly trivial changes (typos, doc updates), you MAY skip running tests locally if:
- ✅ Change is pure text/documentation
- ✅ No code logic affected
- ✅ Deployment script will run tests anyway
However: If your deployment script runs tests, they'll catch any issues regardless.
Escalation Criteria
Escalate to Iterative workflow if:
- Change works but you want peer validation
- Making multiple related changes
- Want quality review cycle
Escalate to Standard workflow if:
- Change affects multiple files
- Tests fail (need to add new tests)
- Edge cases emerge during implementation
- Not sure if change is correct
How to Escalate:
"Escalating to [Iterative|Standard] workflow. [REASON]"
Then restart from Phase 1 of new tier.
Common Quick Workflow Tasks
1. Text Changes
Use case: Fix typos, update copy, change labels
Pattern:
# Find the text
grep -r "old text" src/
# Change it
# (Update in editor)
# Verify
# (Visual check in app)
# Deploy
[your deployment command]
Time: 5-10 minutes
2. Color Changes
Use case: Update colors, adjust styles
Pattern:
# Find color usage
grep -r "#0000FF" src/
# Change it
backgroundColor: '#007AFF'
# Verify colors follow design system
# Deploy
[your deployment command]
Time: 5-10 minutes
3. Config Updates
Use case: Change timeouts, URLs, feature flags
Pattern:
# Find config
grep -r "TIMEOUT" src/config/
# Change value
const API_TIMEOUT = 60000
# Verify value makes sense
# Deploy
[your deployment command]
Time: 5 minutes
4. Documentation Updates
Use case: Update README, comments, docs
Pattern:
# Update documentation file directly
# No tests needed for pure docs
# Deploy
[your deployment command]
Time: 5 minutes
Anti-Patterns (Don't Do This)
❌ Anti-Pattern 1: Making Multiple Changes
"Fix typo in welcome text AND update button color AND adjust padding"
Problem: No longer a quick change. Each change has different risk.
Solution: Escalate to Iterative or make separate Quick changes.
❌ Anti-Pattern 2: Adding Logic
"Change timeout from 30s to 60s AND add retry logic"
Problem: "Add retry logic" is not trivial.
Solution: Escalate to Standard workflow.
❌ Anti-Pattern 3: Modifying Multiple Files
"Update button text in 5 components"
Problem: Multiple files = higher risk, needs review.
Solution: Escalate to Standard workflow (or make 5 separate Quick changes if truly independent).
❌ Anti-Pattern 4: Skipping Verification
Make change → Deploy immediately without checking
Problem: Might deploy broken change.
Solution: Always verify locally first.
Quick Workflow Checklist
Use this checklist for every Quick workflow:
Phase 1: Make Change
- Found the file quickly (< 2 minutes)
- Change is ONE focused thing
- No logic changes
- No new files created
- Verified change locally
- Project conventions followed (check
.atlas/conventions.md)
Phase 2: Deploy
- Changelog/release notes updated (if applicable)
- Type checking passes (if ran)
- Deployed using project's deployment script
- No deployment errors
- Change visible in environment
Red Flags (Escalate if ANY are true):
- ⚠️ Took > 5 minutes to locate code
- ⚠️ Need to modify multiple files
- ⚠️ Tests failing
- ⚠️ Not sure if change is correct
- ⚠️ Need to add new logic
- ⚠️ Cross-platform implications
Example: Complete Quick Workflow
Task: "Fix typo in error message"
Phase 1: Make Change (3 minutes)
Step 1: Locate
grep -r "Opertaion faild" src/
# Found: src/services/api/apiClient.js:142
Step 2: Change
// Before (line 142)
throw new Error('Opertaion faild due to network error')
// After
throw new Error('Operation failed due to network error')
Step 3: Verify
# Quick type check (if applicable)
npm run typecheck
# ✅ Pass
Phase 2: Deploy (2 minutes)
Step 1: Update changelog (if applicable)
## Title: Fix typo in API error message
### Changes Made:
- Fixed typo: "Opertaion faild" → "Operation failed"
Step 2: Deploy
npm run deploy:dev
# Output:
# ✅ Linting: Pass
# ✅ Type checking: Pass
# ✅ Tests: Pass (15/15)
# ✅ Build: Success
# ✅ Deployed: dev.example.com
Total time: 5 minutes ✅
When NOT to Use Quick Workflow
Don't use Quick if:
- Change affects > 1 file → Use Iterative or Standard
- Need to add tests → Use Standard
- Not sure about impact → Use Standard
- Security-related → Use Standard or Full
- Cross-platform concerns → Use Standard
- Need review/validation → Use Iterative
Default rule: When in doubt, use Standard workflow instead.
Success Indicators
You've succeeded when:
- ✅ Deployed in < 15 minutes
- ✅ Tests pass (if ran)
- ✅ No rollbacks needed
- ✅ Change works as expected
- ✅ No side effects
You should have escalated if:
- ⚠️ Took > 15 minutes
- ⚠️ Found edge cases
- ⚠️ Tests failed
- ⚠️ Needed to change multiple files
- ⚠️ Uncertain about correctness
Quick Reference
Quick Workflow Commands:
# Find code
grep -r "search term" src/
find src/ -name "*filename*"
# Verify (adjust for your project)
npm run typecheck # Type checking
npm run lint # Linting
npm test # Tests
# Deploy (use your project's command)
[your deployment command]
Time Allocation:
- Phase 1: 3-10 minutes (locate + change + verify)
- Phase 2: 2-5 minutes (deploy)
- Total: 5-15 minutes
Decision:
- 1 file, trivial, no logic → Quick ✅
- 2+ files, validation needed → Iterative
- Logic changes, tests needed → Standard
Customization for Your Project
To customize this workflow for your project:
- Create
.atlas/conventions.mdwith your standards - Update deployment commands in Phase 2 to match your scripts
- Adjust validation commands to match your tooling
- Define your changelog format (if using one)
- Document platform-specific rules (if applicable)
Example .atlas/conventions.md section for Quick workflow:
## Quick Workflow Conventions
### Deployment
- Command: `./deploy.sh dev`
- Always update: `CHANGELOG.md`
- Pre-deployment: Run `npm run lint && npm test`
### Code Style
- Use ESLint config (no manual formatting)
- Field naming: camelCase for JS, snake_case for DB
- Colors: Only use values from `src/theme/colors.js`
### When to Escalate
- If touching > 1 file
- If tests fail
- If change affects API contracts
Summary
The Quick workflow is for trivial changes only. It's fast because:
- No research phase (you know where the code is)
- No planning phase (change is obvious)
- No review phase (tests cover it)
Use it often for small fixes, but escalate quickly if anything feels non-trivial.
Remember: It's better to start with Quick and escalate than to skip phases in Standard workflow.
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon