---

name: create-architecture description: Generate comprehensive system architecture documents from requirements, supporting Frontend, Backend, and Fullstack projects with scale-adaptive depth and Architecture Decision Records. Use when translating requirements (PRD/epic) into technical architecture for new projects or major features. acceptance:

• architecture_created: "Architecture document created at docs/architecture.md"
• all_sections_present: "All required sections present for project type"
• tech_stack_justified: "Technology stack decisions documented with justification"
• adrs_created: "At least 3 Architecture Decision Records created"
• nfrs_addressed: "Non-functional requirements addressed in architecture" inputs: requirements_file: type: string required: true description: "Path to PRD or requirements document" project_type: type: string required: false description: "frontend | backend | fullstack (auto-detected if not provided)" complexity: type: string required: false description: "simple | medium | complex (auto-calculated if not provided)" existing_architecture: type: string required: false description: "Path to existing architecture (for brownfield projects)" outputs: architecture_file: type: string description: "Path to created architecture document" project_type: type: string description: "Detected or specified project type" complexity_score: type: number description: "Calculated complexity score (0-100)" adrs_created: type: number description: "Number of ADRs created" sections_included: type: array description: "List of architecture sections included" telemetry: emit: "skill.create-architecture.completed" track:
  • project_type
  • complexity_score
  • adrs_created
  • duration_ms
  • tech_stack_size

---

Create Architecture

Purpose

Generate comprehensive, production-ready system architecture documents from requirements. Supports Frontend, Backend, and Fullstack projects with scale-adaptive depth, proven architectural patterns, and Architecture Decision Records (ADRs).

Core Principles:

• Multi-domain support: Frontend, Backend, Fullstack architectures
• Scale-adaptive: Adjusts detail based on project complexity
• Pattern-driven: Leverages proven architectural patterns catalog
• Decision-focused: Documents key decisions as ADRs
• Technology-agnostic: Considers multiple options, recommends best fit

---

Prerequisites

• Requirements document exists (PRD, epic, or user stories)
• Non-functional requirements (NFRs) defined or inferable
• Target user scale and data volume known or estimable
• Project constraints documented (team, timeline, budget)

---

Workflow

1. Load and Analyze Requirements

Action: Read requirements document using bmad-commands

Execute:

Copypython .claude/skills/bmad-commands/scripts/read_file.py \
  --path {requirements_file} \
  --output json

Extract from requirements:

• Functional requirements (features, capabilities)
• Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
• Business goals and constraints
• Technical constraints (technologies, platforms)
• User scale estimates
• Data volume estimates
• Integration requirements

If brownfield: Also load existing architecture for context.

See: references/requirements-analysis-guide.md for extraction techniques

---

2. Detect Project Type

Analyze requirements to determine domain:

Frontend-only indicators:

• UI/UX requirements are dominant
• No backend/API requirements mentioned
• Focus on components, state, routing, styling
• Technologies: React, Vue, Angular, Svelte

Backend-only indicators:

• API/service requirements dominant
• No UI requirements mentioned
• Focus on business logic, data processing, integrations
• Technologies: Node.js, Python, Java, Go, Rust

Fullstack indicators:

• Both frontend and backend requirements
• End-to-end user journeys described
• Integration between UI and services
• Technologies span both domains

Default: If unclear, select Fullstack (most comprehensive)

See: references/project-type-patterns.md for detailed detection criteria

---

3. Assess Complexity

Calculate complexity score based on weighted factors:

Complexity Formula:

CopyScore = (scale × 0.25) + (data × 0.20) + (integrations × 0.20) +
        (perf × 0.15) + (security × 0.10) + (deploy × 0.10)

Categories:

• 0-30: Simple (single-tier, standard patterns)
• 31-60: Medium (multi-tier, moderate patterns)
• 61-100: Complex (distributed, advanced patterns)

This determines: Architecture depth, pattern selection, ADR count

See: references/complexity-assessment.md for detailed scoring guide

---

4. Select Architectural Patterns

Based on project type and complexity, select patterns:

Frontend Patterns:

• Component architecture (atomic design, compound components)
• State management (Redux, Zustand, Context, Recoil)
• Routing strategies (file-based, declarative, nested)
• Styling approach (CSS-in-JS, Tailwind, CSS Modules)
• Data fetching (React Query, SWR, Apollo)

Backend Patterns:

• API design (REST, GraphQL, tRPC, gRPC)
• Service architecture (monolith, microservices, modular monolith)
• Data modeling (relational, document, event-sourced)
• Integration patterns (message queues, event buses, webhooks)
• Caching strategies (Redis, Memcached, CDN)

Fullstack Patterns:

• Framework selection (Next.js, Remix, SvelteKit, Nuxt)
• Monorepo structure (Turborepo, Nx, Lerna)
• API layers (BFF, API Gateway, tRPC)
• Deployment (Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Docker/K8s)
• Authentication (NextAuth, Passport, Auth0, Clerk)

See: references/patterns-catalog.md for complete pattern library

---

5. Evaluate Technology Stack

For each architectural component, evaluate options:

Evaluation Criteria:

1. Requirements fit (does it meet functional/NFRs?)
2. Team expertise (can team use this effectively?)
3. Community support (strong ecosystem?)
4. Performance (meets requirements?)
5. Scalability (scales with growth?)
6. Cost (licensing/infrastructure costs?)
7. Maintenance (long-term burden?)
8. Migration path (can we change later?)

Decision Process:

1. Identify requirements for component
2. Generate 3-5 alternatives
3. Evaluate against criteria
4. Select best fit
5. Document in ADR

See: references/technology-decision-framework.md for evaluation matrices

---

6. Generate Architecture Document

Create comprehensive architecture at docs/architecture.md:

Structure (adapt based on project type):

Copy# [Project Name] Architecture

## 1. System Overview
[High-level description, context, goals]

## 2. Architecture Diagrams
[C4 context, container, component diagrams]

## 3. Frontend Architecture (if applicable)
[Component design, state management, routing, styling, build]

## 4. Backend Architecture (if applicable)
[API design, services, data layer, business logic, integrations]

## 5. Fullstack Integration (if applicable)
[End-to-end flows, API contracts, auth, deployment]

## 6. Data Architecture
[Data models, relationships, migrations, caching]

## 7. Technology Stack
[All technologies with justifications]

## 8. Deployment Architecture
[Infrastructure, environments, CI/CD, monitoring]

## 9. Security Architecture
[Authentication, authorization, data protection, compliance]

## 10. Performance Architecture
[Caching, optimization, CDN, load balancing]

## 11. Scalability Plan
[Horizontal/vertical scaling, bottlenecks, growth plan]

## 12. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
[Key decisions with context, options considered, rationale]

## 13. Migration Strategy (brownfield only)
[Current state, target state, migration path, risks]

## 14. Open Questions & Risks
[Unknowns, risks, mitigation strategies]

Scale adaptation:

• Simple: Focus on sections 1, 3-7, 12 (10-15 pages)
• Medium: Include sections 1-12 (15-25 pages)
• Complex: All sections with deep analysis (25-40 pages)

See: references/templates.md for section templates

---

7. Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

For each significant decision, create ADR:

ADR Template:

Copy# ADR-XXX: [Decision Title]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded

## Context
[Problem and constraints]

## Decision
[What we decided]

## Alternatives Considered
1. Option A: [pros/cons]
2. Option B: [pros/cons]
3. Option C: [pros/cons]

## Rationale
[Why this option]

## Consequences
[Positive and negative impacts]

## Related Decisions
[Links to other ADRs]

Minimum ADRs:

• Simple architecture: 3-5 ADRs
• Medium architecture: 5-10 ADRs
• Complex architecture: 10-15 ADRs

Common ADR topics:

• Primary technology stack selection
• Database choice
• API design approach
• State management strategy
• Authentication mechanism
• Deployment platform
• Monitoring and observability approach

See: references/adr-examples.md for ADR examples

---

8. Address Non-Functional Requirements

Ensure architecture addresses all NFRs:

Performance:

• Response time targets (p50, p95, p99)
• Throughput requirements (req/sec)
• Optimization strategies (caching, CDN, lazy loading)

Scalability:

• User growth projections
• Data growth projections
• Horizontal scaling strategy
• Bottleneck identification

Security:

• Authentication and authorization
• Data encryption (at rest, in transit)
• Input validation and sanitization
• Compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)

Reliability:

• Availability targets (99%, 99.9%, 99.99%)
• Fault tolerance strategies
• Disaster recovery plan
• Backup and restore procedures

Maintainability:

• Code organization principles
• Testing strategy
• Documentation standards
• Technical debt management

See: references/nfr-architecture-mapping.md for NFR checklist

---

9. Generate Supplementary Artifacts (Optional)

If requested or beneficial:

Architecture Diagrams:

Copypython .claude/skills/bmad-commands/scripts/generate_architecture_diagram.py \
  --architecture docs/architecture.md \
  --type c4-context \
  --output docs/diagrams/

Technology Analysis Report:

Copypython .claude/skills/bmad-commands/scripts/analyze_tech_stack.py \
  --architecture docs/architecture.md \
  --output json

Extract ADRs to separate files:

Copypython .claude/skills/bmad-commands/scripts/extract_adrs.py \
  --architecture docs/architecture.md \
  --output docs/adrs/

---

10. Validate Completeness

Self-validate before marking complete:

Check all required sections present:

• ✅ System Overview
• ✅ Architecture appropriate for project type
• ✅ Technology Stack documented
• ✅ NFRs addressed
• ✅ At least 3 ADRs created
• ✅ Security considerations included
• ✅ Scalability plan defined

Quality check:

• ✅ All technology choices justified
• ✅ Alternatives considered
• ✅ Risks identified
• ✅ No critical gaps

If validation fails: Address gaps before completion.

---

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Greenfield Frontend Application

Input: React dashboard requirements Output: Frontend-only architecture with component design, state (Zustand), routing (React Router), styling (Tailwind), build (Vite)

Scenario 2: Backend API Service

Input: REST API requirements for mobile app Output: Backend-only architecture with Express.js, PostgreSQL, Prisma, Redis caching, JWT auth

Scenario 3: Fullstack E-commerce Platform

Input: Comprehensive e-commerce requirements Output: Fullstack architecture with Next.js, tRPC, PostgreSQL, Stripe integration, Vercel deployment

Scenario 4: Brownfield System Modernization

Input: Legacy monolith + modernization requirements Output: Migration architecture with incremental microservices extraction, API gateway, strangler fig pattern

See: references/example-architectures.md for complete examples

---

Success Criteria

An architecture is complete and ready for implementation when:

Documentation Completeness

• ✅ Architecture document created at docs/architecture.md
• ✅ All required sections present for project type:
  • System Overview & Context
  • Technology Stack (complete and justified)
  • Deployment Architecture
  • Security Architecture
  • Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
  • Project-specific sections (Frontend/Backend/Fullstack)
• ✅ Architecture diagrams included (minimum 1, recommended 2-3)
• ✅ Technology stack fully documented with versions

Decision Quality

• ✅ Minimum ADR count met:
  • Simple (0-30): ≥3 ADRs
  • Medium (31-60): ≥5 ADRs
  • Complex (61-100): ≥10 ADRs
• ✅ Each ADR includes:
  • Context and problem statement
  • Decision made
  • Alternatives considered (minimum 2)
  • Rationale with data/benchmarks
  • Consequences (positive and negative)
• ✅ Technology choices justified with alternatives

NFR Coverage

• ✅ All Non-Functional Requirements addressed:
  • Performance: Targets specified (e.g., p95 <500ms)
  • Scalability: Growth projections and scaling plan
  • Security: Auth, authorization, encryption, compliance
  • Reliability: Availability target, redundancy, failover
  • Maintainability: Testing strategy, code organization
• ✅ NFRs mapped to concrete architecture decisions

Quality Gates

• ✅ No critical gaps or missing sections
• ✅ No contradictory decisions
• ✅ Security considerations documented
• ✅ Scalability approach defined
• ✅ Deployment strategy clear
• ✅ Cost implications considered

Validation Ready

• ✅ Architecture can be validated with validate-architecture skill
• ✅ Expected validation score ≥70
• ✅ Ready for team review
• ✅ Implementation-ready (developers can start coding)

Checklist:

Copy[ ] Architecture document created
[ ] All required sections present
[ ] Minimum ADR count met
[ ] Technologies justified
[ ] NFRs addressed
[ ] Diagrams included
[ ] Security documented
[ ] Deployment defined
[ ] No critical gaps
[ ] Validation score ≥70

---

Best Practices

1. Start with requirements - Architecture follows requirements, not the reverse
2. Consider alternatives - Evaluate 3-5 options for major decisions
3. Document decisions - Every significant choice becomes an ADR
4. Think long-term - Consider maintenance, scaling, team growth
5. Be pragmatic - Choose appropriate tools, not trendy ones
6. Address NFRs explicitly - Don't assume performance/security
7. Plan for failure - Include error handling, monitoring, resilience
8. Keep it readable - Architecture doc is for humans, not just completeness

---

Reference Files

• references/requirements-analysis-guide.md - Requirement extraction techniques
• references/project-type-patterns.md - Project type detection criteria
• references/complexity-assessment.md - Detailed complexity scoring
• references/patterns-catalog.md - Complete architectural patterns library
• references/technology-decision-framework.md - Tech evaluation matrices
• references/templates.md - Architecture document templates
• references/adr-examples.md - ADR examples by domain
• references/nfr-architecture-mapping.md - NFR to architecture mapping
• references/example-architectures.md - Complete architecture examples

---

When to Escalate

Escalate to user when:

• Requirements are insufficient or contradictory
• Conflicting NFRs (e.g., cost vs. performance)
• Missing critical information (user scale, data volume unknown)
• Highly complex system (score >80) requires expert input
• Compliance requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC2) need legal review
• Technology choices have significant business impact
• Budget constraints eliminate viable options

---

Part of BMAD Enhanced Planning Suite