
writer-selfloop
by WILLOSCAR
Research pipelines as semantic execution units: each skill declares inputs/outputs, acceptance criteria, and guardrails. Evidence-first methodology prevents hollow writing through structured intermediate artifacts.
SKILL.md
name: writer-selfloop
description: |
Writing self-loop for surveys: run the strict section-quality gate, then rewrite only the failing sections/*.md files until the report is PASS.
Trigger: writer self-loop, writing loop, quality gate loop, rewrite failing sections, 自循环, 反复改到 PASS.
Use when: per-section files exist but C5 is FAIL/BLOCKED (thin sections, missing leads/front matter, citation-scope violations, generator voice).
Skip if: you are still pre-C2 (NO PROSE), or evidence packs are incomplete (fix C3/C4 first).
Network: none.
Guardrail: do not invent facts; only use citation keys present in citations/ref.bib; keep citations in-scope per outline/evidence_bindings.jsonl; do not add/remove citation keys during rewrites.
Writer Self-loop (fix only what fails)
Purpose: make writing converge without rewriting the whole paper.
This is the writing self-healing loop:
Default mode: semantic triage (LLM-first)
Treat the gate as a router, not as a reason to rewrite everything.
- First, classify each failure as: evidence substrate vs writing execution vs voice contamination vs citation hygiene.
- Then, fix the earliest responsible artifact (often not the merged draft).
- Rewrite only the failing files; do not churn working sections.
If you do not run the helper script, you can still execute this skill by reading sections/*.md + packs and writing output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.md manually in the same PASS/FAIL style.
Role cards (use explicitly)
Writing Manager (triage + convergence)
Mission: make the draft converge by fixing only failing units and routing issues upstream when needed.
Do:
- Rewrite only files flagged by the gate (one at a time).
- If evidence is thin, route upstream instead of padding prose.
- Keep citation keys and scope stable during rewrites.
Avoid:
- Global rewrites that churn working sections.
- Rewriting around evidence gaps with generic filler.
Router (earliest responsible artifact)
Mission: connect a visible writing failure to the earliest upstream fix.
Do:
- Template voice -> local rewrite (subsection-polisher / front-matter-writer / chapter-lead-writer).
- Thin evidence -> evidence-selfloop (notes/bindings/packs).
Avoid:
- Repeatedly rewriting the same section when the pack cannot support it.
Role prompt: Writing Manager (triage + convergence)
You are the writing manager for a survey draft.
Your job is to make the draft converge by fixing only what fails, and by routing issues to the earliest responsible artifact.
Rules:
- If a section fails because the evidence is thin or out-of-scope pressure is high, do NOT pad prose.
Route upstream to evidence-selfloop (notes/bindings/packs) and unblock the substrate.
- If a section fails because the prose is templated (narration openers, slide navigation, repeated disclaimer spam), rewrite locally.
- Never change citation keys during rewrites; keep scope local.
Working style:
- small, auditable edits
- one failing file at a time
- every fix either (a) improves argument moves, or (b) restores paper voice
- the gate is deterministic (it inspects
sections/+sections/sections_manifest.jsonl) - the fixes are semantic (rewrite prose to execute argument moves and restore paper voice)
Inputs
sections/sections_manifest.jsonl(expected files + allowed citations)sections/*.md(the actual prose units)outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl(preferred per-H3 pack)outline/evidence_bindings.jsonlcitations/ref.bib
Optional routing context:
output/EVIDENCE_SELFLOOP_TODO.md(if evidence gaps are already known)outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl,outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl
Output
output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.md(report-class; always written)
Workflow
- Run the gate
- Run the writer self-loop script (see Script section below). It reads
sections/sections_manifest.jsonland the actualsections/*.mdfiles.
- Read the TODO report
- Open
output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.mdand identify the failing file paths. - For each failing H3, load its pack from
outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl. - If a pack is missing or you need scope reminders, consult
outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl; for chapter-level context (leads/throughlines), consultoutline/chapter_briefs.jsonl.
- Triage (writing vs evidence)
Route upstream (run evidence-selfloop) when:
output/EVIDENCE_SELFLOOP_TODO.mdalready indicates missing anchors/comparisons for the same subsection- the pack in
outline/writer_context_packs.jsonlis too thin to satisfy argument moves without guessing - you keep wanting out-of-scope citations outside
outline/evidence_bindings.jsonl
Rewrite locally when:
- the pack is rich enough, but prose is template-y (narration openers, slide navigation, repeated discourse stems)
- the section has content but lacks a thesis, contrasts, evaluation anchoring, or limitations
- Use the right playbook for the failing file type
- Front matter (
sections/abstract.md,sections/S<sec_id>.mdfor Intro/Related Work,sections/discussion.md,sections/conclusion.md): usefront-matter-writer. - Chapter leads (
sections/S<sec_id>_lead.md): usechapter-lead-writer. - H3 bodies (
sections/S<sub_id>.md): usesubsection-writer(draft) orsubsection-polisher(local fix).
- Keep scope + citations stable
- Keep citation keys unchanged and validate them against
citations/ref.bib. - Stay in scope per
outline/evidence_bindings.jsonl(prefer subsection-first).
- Rerun the gate until PASS
After PASS (merge-aware voice safety):
- Proceed to
section-logic-polisher->transition-weaver->section-merger->post-merge-voice-gate. - If
post-merge-voice-gateFAILs withsource: transitions, fixoutline/transitions.mdviatransition-weaverand re-merge (do not patch the merged draft).
After PASS (non-blocking style hygiene):
- Open
output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.mdand read## Style Smells (non-blocking). - If it flags repeated slot phrases (e.g.,
Two limitations ...) or overused stems (e.g.,The key point is that), runstyle-harmonizeron the listedsections/*.mdfiles. - Keep meaning + citations fixed; treat this as surface-level rewrite, not new content.
How to fix a failing H3 (semantic recipe)
- Use
tension_statement+thesisfrom the pack to rewrite paragraph 1 (end with the thesis). - Use
comparison_cardsto write explicit A-vs-B contrast sentences. - Use
evaluation_anchor_minimal/ protocol snippets to add task/metric/constraint context. - Use limitation hooks to add a real caveat (not boilerplate).
Paper voice repairs (high-impact, low-risk)
Narration opener -> content claim:
- Bad:
This subsection surveys ... - Better: start with a tension/decision/lens sentence, then end paragraph 1 with the thesis.
Slide navigation -> argument bridge:
- Bad:
Next, we move from X to Y. - Better:
Having established X, we can now examine how Y changes the trade-offs under comparable protocols.
Meta "survey should" -> literature-facing observation:
- Bad:
Therefore, survey comparisons should ... - Better:
Across reported protocols, ... varies, which makes ... fragile unless ...
Disclaimer spam -> one policy paragraph + local caveat only when needed:
- Keep evidence policy once in front matter; delete repeated "abstract-only" boilerplate inside H3.
Stop conditions (when rewriting is the wrong move)
Stop and route upstream if:
- you cannot write a contrast or evaluation anchor without guessing
- the pack lacks benchmarks/metrics/protocol tokens needed for the subsection\x27s core claim
- fixing one H3 keeps forcing out-of-scope citations
Failure codes -> routing (how to read the gate)
The writer gate emits short issue codes. Treat them as routers and stop trying to pad prose around missing evidence.
First classify failures:
- Evidence substrate: packs/anchors/comparisons are too thin to execute argument moves without guessing. Route upstream (
evidence-selfloop). - Writing execution: packs are rich enough, but the section did not execute moves (thesis/contrast/eval/limitation). Rewrite locally.
- Voice contamination: narration/slide/pipeline voice. Rewrite locally (opener + bridges), do not touch citations.
- Citation hygiene: undefined keys / out-of-scope pressure. Fix citations/bindings or rewrite to in-scope; do not add new keys.
Quick map (common codes):
missing_sections_manifest,empty_sections_manifest,sections_missing_files: runsubsection-writer(create missing files + refresh manifest).sections_h3_has_headings: remove headings; H3 bodies are body-only.sections_intro_*,sections_related_work_*: rewrite front matter viafront-matter-writer(dense positioning + one methodology note).sections_h3_too_few_paragraphs,sections_h3_too_short: if the pack is rich, expand by executing contrasts + eval anchor + limitation; if the pack is thin, route toevidence-selfloop.sections_h3_missing_contrast: add explicit A-vs-B usingcomparison_cards; if cards are missing, route toevidence-selfloop(briefs/packs).sections_h3_missing_eval_anchor,sections_h3_missing_cited_numeric: add minimal protocol context (task/metric/constraint) in the same paragraph; if unknown, route upstream or weaken the claim.sections_h3_missing_limitation: add a subsection-specific limitation; if none exists in the pack, route upstream.sections_h3_narration_template_opener,sections_h3_slide_narration,sections_contains_pipeline_voice: rewrite openers/bridges to paper voice (no navigation commentary).sections_h3_evidence_policy_disclaimer_spam: delete repeats; keep evidence policy once in front matter.sections_cites_missing_in_bib: reruncitation-verifier(do not invent keys).sections_cites_outside_mapping: rewrite to in-scope OR fix mapping/bindings (C2/C4) and rebuild packs; do not patch in the merged draft.sections_h3_sparse_citations: if scope allows, plan adds viacitation-diversifierthen apply viacitation-injector; if scope is too tight, expand mapping/bindings upstream.
Script (optional; deterministic gate)
Quick Start
python .codex/skills/writer-selfloop/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>
All Options
--workspace <dir>--unit-id <U###>--inputs <semicolon-separated>--outputs <semicolon-separated>--checkpoint <C#>
Examples
- Generate an actionable TODO list for failing
sections/*.md:python .codex/skills/writer-selfloop/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon

