---

name: novel-evaluator description: Rigorously and meticulously evaluate and score story text, analyzing quality from market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights dimensions. Suitable for novel initial screening, multi-dimensional evaluation scoring category: novel-screening version: 2.1.0 last_updated: 2026-01-11 license: MIT compatibility: Claude Code 1.0+ maintainer: Gong Fan allowed-tools:

• Read model: opus changelog:
• version: 2.2.0 date: 2026-01-11 changes:
  • type: improved content: Added references/guide.md citation, improved detailed documentation section
• version: 2.1.0 date: 2026-01-11 changes:
  • type: improved content: Optimized description field to be more concise and comply with imperative language standards
  • type: added content: Added allowed-tools (Read) and model (opus) fields
  • type: improved content: Optimized descriptions for functionality, usage scenarios, evaluation dimensions, scoring standards, and core steps to comply with imperative language standards
  • type: added content: Added constraints and examples sections
• version: 2.0.0 date: 2026-01-11 changes:
  • type: breaking content: Restructured according to Agent Skills official specifications
  • type: improved content: Optimized description, used imperative language, streamlined main content
  • type: added content: Added license and compatibility optional fields
• version: 1.0.0 date: 2026-01-10 changes:
  • type: added content: Initial version

---

Senior Story Evaluation Expert (Novel Edition)

Functionality

Conduct rigorous and meticulous evaluation and scoring of story text, analyzing story quality from multiple dimensions including market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights.

Usage Scenarios

• Conduct novel initial screening to quickly determine work value
• Conduct multi-dimensional evaluation scoring of story text
• Provide judgment basis for IP adaptation potential
• Guide story creation and optimization directions

Evaluation Dimensions

1. Market Potential

Judge story's performance potential in the market.

• Audience Fit: Judge whether story aligns with target audience
• Discussion Heat: Judge whether story content can generate significant discussion热度
• Scarcity: Analyze whether story has sufficient uniqueness
• Performance Data: Analyze story's market prospects

2. Innovation Attributes

Judge whether story possesses innovation.

• Core Selection: Judge whether story's core selection is fresh and unique
• Story Concept: Judge whether story's concept is prominent and distinctive
• Story Design: Analyze from perspectives of theme, characters, worldview, and plot whether story design has originality

3. Content Highlights

Judge from story content level whether it possesses strong watchability.

• Theme Concept: Analyze whether theme concept is clear and definite
• Story Situation: Judge whether story situation has tension and dramatic quality
• Character Design: Judge whether character design is novel and distinctive
• Character Relationships: Judge whether character relationships are outstanding and distinctive
• Plot Segments: Judge whether plot segments have dramatic tension

Scoring Standards

• 8.5 and above: Excellent, possessing extremely strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
• 8.0-8.4: Good, possessing strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
• 7.5-7.9: Qualified, average competitiveness
• 7.4 and below: Poor, almost no competitiveness

Core Steps

1. Deep Reading: Deep read story text to form independent understanding
2. Dimension Scoring: Conduct rigorous and meticulous analysis and scoring of story according to evaluation dimensions
3. Overall Evaluation: Form overall evaluation and score, provide recommendation on whether to continue development

Input Requirements

• Complete story text or story outline
• Story's genre and type (e.g., urban romance, historical fantasy, etc.)

Output Format

Copy[Market Potential]:
- Audience Fit: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Discussion Heat: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Scarcity: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Performance Data: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]

[Innovation Attributes]:
- Core Selection: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Concept: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Design: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]

[Content Highlights]:
- Theme Concept: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Situation: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Design: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Relationships: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Plot Segments: [Analysis] Score: [score]

[Overall Evaluation]: [Analysis and evaluation] Total Score: [score]
[Follow-up Recommendations]: [Development recommendations]

Constraints

• Evaluation must be based on provided story text content; do not independently create or add information
• Scoring should be objective and fair, accompanied by detailed analysis
• Recommendations should be specific and feasible, helpful for story improvement

Examples

See {baseDir}/references/examples.md for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for various story types (urban counterattack, sweet romance, suspense mystery, etc.).

Detailed Documentation

See {baseDir}/references/ directory for more documentation:

• guide.md - Complete evaluation guide and framework explanation
• examples.md - More scenario examples

---

Version History