---

name: grant-writing description: Develop competitive research funding proposals for major agencies including NSF, NIH, DOE, and foundations. Guides persuasive proposal writing that demonstrates scientific rigor, innovation, and impact. allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch, Task]

Grant Writing Assistant

Core Philosophy

Funding proposals are persuasive documents that must simultaneously demonstrate scientific rigor, innovative thinking, practical feasibility, and broader significance. Every section should answer: "Why should we fund this work?"

Proposal Components

1. Executive Summary / Abstract

• Concise overview of the entire project
• Problem, approach, and expected outcomes
• Often the only section some reviewers read carefully

2. Specific Aims / Objectives

• Clear, measurable goals
• Typically 2-4 aims for most grants
• Each aim should be independently valuable

3. Significance / Background

• Establish the problem's importance
• Demonstrate knowledge of the field
• Identify the gap your work addresses

4. Innovation Statement

• What's new about your approach?
• How does it advance beyond current methods?
• Technical and conceptual innovation

5. Research Strategy / Approach

• Detailed methodology
• Experimental design and rationale
• Alternative approaches if primary fails

6. Preliminary Data

• Evidence supporting feasibility
• Pilot results demonstrating capability
• Essential for most NIH and many other grants

7. Timeline and Milestones

• Realistic project schedule
• Clear deliverables at each stage
• Demonstrates planning and feasibility

8. Team and Environment

• Qualifications of key personnel
• Institutional resources available
• Collaborative arrangements

9. Budget and Justification

• Detailed cost breakdown
• Clear connection between costs and activities
• Follow agency guidelines precisely

10. Broader Impacts

• Societal benefits beyond science
• Training and education components
• Outreach and dissemination plans

Agency-Specific Guidance

NSF (National Science Foundation)

• Equal weight on Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts
• Strong emphasis on societal benefit
• Integration of research and education valued

NIH (National Institutes of Health)

• Five review criteria: Significance, Investigator, Innovation, Approach, Environment
• Preliminary data strongly expected
• Clinical relevance for translational work

DOE (Department of Energy)

• Energy and environmental mission alignment
• Often requires cost-sharing
• Laboratory partnerships valued

DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)

• High-risk, high-reward thinking
• Transformative potential emphasized
• Clear transition pathway needed

Foundations

• Mission alignment critical
• Often more flexible formatting
• Relationship building important

Writing Strategies

Persuasive Techniques

• Lead with the problem's significance
• Use concrete examples and data
• Anticipate and address concerns
• Build narrative momentum

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Overpromising results
• Vague methodology
• Ignoring feasibility concerns
• Missing page or format requirements
• Weak significance statement

Review Process Understanding

• Proposals typically reviewed by peers
• Reviewers have limited time per proposal
• Make key points easy to find
• Use clear headings and structure

Proposal Development Workflow

1. Planning: Analyze announcement, identify fit, outline approach
2. Drafting: Write sections, gather supporting materials
3. Internal Review: Get colleague feedback, revise
4. Finalization: Polish writing, check compliance
5. Submission: Follow agency procedures exactly

Integration

Works with:

• lit-review for background research
• academic-writing for prose quality
• hypothesis-dev for research design
• reference-management for citations