
deep-reading-analyst
by Jst-Well-Dan
SKILL.md
name: deep-reading-analyst description: Systematic analysis framework for articles, papers, and long-form content using 5 proven thinking models (McKinsey Communication Framework, Comprehensive Task Checklist, Critical Thinking, Inversion Thinking, Systems Thinking).
Deep Reading Analyst
Transform surface-level reading into deep learning through systematic thinking frameworks.
What This Skill Does
Provides structured analysis workflows using 5 proven thinking frameworks across 4 depth levels (15min to 120min+). Guides users from understanding to application with actionable outputs.
When to Use This Skill
Use when users:
- Analyze complex articles, papers, or long-form content
- Evaluate arguments and identify logical flaws
- Extract actionable insights from reading materials
- Create structured learning notes or study summaries
- Compare multiple sources for research
- Apply specific thinking frameworks (SCQA, mental models, etc.)
- Provide URLs or long-form content with intent to deeply understand
Response Pattern
When user provides content for analysis:
1. Quick Assessment (15 seconds)
- Identify content type (article/paper/guide/opinion/case study)
- Check if user specified depth level or frameworks
- Note user's stated goal (problem-solving/learning/writing/decision/curiosity)
2. Initialize Analysis (conversationally)
Ask brief orientation questions if unclear:
- "What's your main goal?" (problem-solving/learning/writing/decision/curiosity)
- "How deep?" (quick 15min / standard 30min / deep 60min / research 120min+)
- "Any specific frameworks?" (or auto-suggest based on content type)
Default if user doesn't specify: Level 2 (Standard, 30min), auto-select frameworks
See references/guides/framework_selection.md for auto-selection rules by content type.
3. Conduct Analysis
Always start with structural understanding:
- Extract core thesis (1 sentence)
- Apply SCQA framework (
references/frameworks/quick/scqa.md) - Run 5W2H completeness check (
references/frameworks/quick/5w2h.md)
Then apply frameworks based on depth level:
- Level 1 (15min): SCQA + 5W2H → Top 3 insights + 1 action
- Level 2 (30min): Add Critical Thinking + Inversion
- Level 3 (60min): Add Systems Thinking
- Level 4 (120min+): Add cross-source comparison via web_search
Load framework reference files as needed. See detailed workflow in references/guides/workflow_guide.md.
4. Generate Tailored Output
Format output based on user's stated goal:
- Problem-solving: Solutions + action plan + risk mitigation
- Learning: Concept notes + verification questions
- Writing: Arguments + evidence + quotes + critical analysis
- Decision-making: Scenario analysis + recommendation
- Curiosity: Key insights + interesting patterns + rabbit holes
See references/templates/output_formats.md for templates.
5. Knowledge Activation
Always end with:
- 🎯 Top 3 takeaways (insight + why it matters + one action each)
- 💡 Quick win (one thing to try in next 24 hours)
- 🔗 Next steps (to deepen or apply)
- 🧭 Frameworks used (checklist of what was applied)
6. Adapt to User Signals
Throughout conversation, read signals and adjust:
- User wants conciseness → Switch to Level 1 mode
- User challenges analysis → Lean into Critical Thinking + Inversion
- User asks "how to use" → Focus on action plan
- User wants multiple views → Apply Critical Thinking from different angles
- User mentions risks → Apply Inversion immediately
- User asks about connections → Use Systems Thinking
See references/guides/interaction_guide.md for detailed interaction patterns.
Analysis Depth Levels
| Level | Time | Frameworks | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 (Quick) | 15min | SCQA + 5W2H | Structure + gaps + top 3 insights + 1 action |
| Level 2 (Standard) | 30min | + Critical Thinking + Inversion | Argument evaluation + risk analysis |
| Level 3 (Deep) | 60min | + Systems Thinking | Relationship mapping + leverage points |
| Level 4 (Research) | 120min+ | + Cross-source comparison | Multi-article synthesis + integrated view |
Framework Arsenal
Level 1: Quick Analysis (15 min)
- 📋 SCQA - Structure thinking →
references/frameworks/quick/scqa.md - 🔍 5W2H - Completeness check →
references/frameworks/quick/5w2h.md
Level 2: Standard Analysis (30 min)
- 🎯 Critical Thinking - Argument evaluation →
references/frameworks/standard/critical_thinking.md - 🔄 Inversion - Risk identification →
references/frameworks/standard/inversion.md
Level 3: Deep Analysis (60 min)
- 🔗 Systems Thinking - Relationship mapping →
references/frameworks/deep/systems_thinking.md
Level 4: Research Analysis (120 min+)
- 📊 Cross-Source Comparison - Multi-article synthesis →
references/templates/comparison_matrix.md
Quality Standards
Every analysis must:
- ✅ Stay faithful to original content (no misrepresentation)
- ✅ Distinguish facts from opinions
- ✅ Provide concrete examples from the text
- ✅ Apply frameworks appropriately (not force-fit)
- ✅ Connect to user's stated goal and context
- ✅ End with specific, actionable steps
- ✅ Cite specific sections (paragraph numbers, quotes)
Avoid:
- ❌ Overwhelming with all frameworks (respect depth level)
- ❌ Academic jargon without explanation
- ❌ Analysis without application
- ❌ Verbatim copying (synthesize instead)
- ❌ Superficial framework application
See full quality checklist in references/guides/quality_standards.md.
Reference Files
Guides (How to use this skill)
- Workflow:
references/guides/workflow_guide.md- Complete Step 1-5 process - Framework selection:
references/guides/framework_selection.md- When to use which framework - Interaction:
references/guides/interaction_guide.md- How to adapt to user signals - Quality:
references/guides/quality_standards.md- Standards and checklist
Frameworks (Thinking models)
- Quick:
references/frameworks/quick/- SCQA, 5W2H (Level 1, 15min) - Standard:
references/frameworks/standard/- Critical Thinking, Inversion (Level 2, 30min) - Deep:
references/frameworks/deep/- Systems Thinking (Level 3, 60min)
Templates (Output formats)
- Formats:
references/templates/output_formats.md- 8 output format templates - Comparison:
references/templates/comparison_matrix.md- Cross-source analysis template
Progressive Disclosure Design
This skill uses three-level loading:
- Metadata (always loaded): Name + description (~100 words)
- SKILL.md (loaded when triggered): Usage guide (~150 lines)
- References (loaded as needed): Detailed frameworks and guides
Load reference files only when:
- User chooses deeper analysis level
- Specific framework is requested or needed
- Detailed guidance required for complex situations
This keeps context efficient while providing comprehensive capabilities.
Advanced Usage
Custom Framework Combinations
Users can request specific combinations:
- "Use SCQA + Inversion" - Structure with risk analysis
- "Apply Critical Thinking + Systems Thinking" - Quality check with relationship mapping
- "5W2H + Critical Thinking" - Completeness + quality check
Iterative Deepening
Start light, offer to go deeper:
- After Level 1: "Want to go deeper on any part?"
- Mid-analysis: "Should we apply [X framework] to explore this?"
- Based on engagement: Progressively add frameworks
Domain-Specific Optimization
Auto-optimize for content type (see framework_selection.md):
- Business/Strategy: SCQA + Inversion + Systems Thinking
- Technical/Research: 5W2H + Critical Thinking + Systems Thinking
- Personal Development: SCQA + Inversion + Critical Thinking
- Decision-Making: Inversion + SCQA + Systems Thinking
- Creative: SCQA + Critical Thinking + Systems Thinking
Remember: The goal is insight and action, not framework completion. Use frameworks as tools to reveal understanding, not as checklists to complete. Quality of thinking > quantity of frameworks applied.
Progressive approach: Start with what user needs, offer more depth as they engage. Read signals, adapt accordingly.
Score
Total Score
Based on repository quality metrics
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
Reviews
Reviews coming soon