Back to list
Euda1mon1a

signal-party

by Euda1mon1a

2🍴 0📅 Jan 24, 2026

SKILL.md


name: signal-party description: Parallel metrics collection using G-6 SIGNAL. Deploy 6 probes to gather metrics from all sources for data-driven decisions. model_tier: sonnet parallel_hints: can_parallel_with: [search-party, ops-party] must_serialize_with: [] preferred_batch_size: 6 context_hints: max_file_context: 50 compression_level: 2 requires_git_context: true requires_db_context: true escalation_triggers:

  • pattern: "critical.*threshold" reason: "Critical threshold breaches need immediate attention"
  • pattern: "defense.level.(RED|BLACK)" reason: "Emergency defense levels require escalation"
  • keyword: ["anomaly", "violation"] reason: "Significant anomalies or violations require review"

SIGNAL_PARTY Skill

Purpose: Coordinated parallel metrics collection with 6 specialized probes Created: 2026-01-06 Trigger: /signal-party command Aliases: /signal, /metrics, /sp6 Owner: G6_SIGNAL (G-6 Staff)


When to Use

Deploy SIGNAL_PARTY when you need comprehensive metrics intelligence:

  • Performance analysis for schedules or system health
  • Data-driven decision support for strategic planning
  • Resilience framework health assessment
  • Trend analysis and anomaly detection
  • Pre-deployment validation metrics
  • Evidence collection for compliance reviews
  • System health monitoring and diagnostics

Do NOT use for:

  • Simple single-metric queries (use direct MCP tool calls)
  • When only one lens is needed
  • Interpreting data (SIGNAL collects, doesn't recommend)

Economics: Zero Marginal Wall-Clock Cost

Critical Understanding: Parallel agents with the same timeout cost nothing extra in wall-clock time.

Sequential (BAD):        Parallel (GOOD):
6 probes × 60s each      6 probes × 60s in parallel
Total: 360s              Total: 60s (6x faster)

Implication: Always spawn all probes. There is no cost savings from running fewer.


The Six Probes

Deploy 6 SIGNAL probes in parallel, each gathering metrics from a different domain:

ProbeLensWhat It Finds
SCHEDULINGSolver metricsGeneration time, constraint violations, coverage gaps, fairness scores
RESILIENCEHealth scoresUtilization thresholds, N-1/N-2 status, defense levels, circuit breaker state
COMPLIANCEACGME status80-hour violations, 1-in-7 violations, near-misses, compliance trends
PERFORMANCESystem healthAPI response times, error rates, resource usage, throughput metrics
AGENTSExecution metricsSuccess rates, latencies, spawn counts, token usage, timeout incidents
TRENDSTime seriesWeek-over-week changes, anomalies, patterns, seasonal variations

Probe Details

SCHEDULING Probe

Focus: Scheduling engine performance and quality

  • Solver execution time (median, p95, p99)
  • Constraint violation counts by type
  • Coverage gaps and unassigned shifts
  • Schedule fairness scores (variance, equity)
  • Swap success/failure rates
  • Recent schedule generation attempts

RESILIENCE Probe

Focus: Resilience framework health indicators

  • Current defense level (GREEN/YELLOW/ORANGE/RED/BLACK)
  • Utilization percentage vs. 80% threshold
  • N-1 contingency status (can lose 1 resident?)
  • N-2 contingency status (can lose 2 residents?)
  • Circuit breaker states (CLOSED/OPEN/HALF_OPEN)
  • Unified Critical Index score
  • Recovery distance metrics

COMPLIANCE Probe

Focus: ACGME compliance monitoring

  • 80-hour rule violations (current, trend)
  • 1-in-7 day off violations
  • Supervision ratio violations
  • Compliance percentage by rule type
  • Near-miss events (within 5% of limit)
  • Compliance trend (improving/stable/degrading)

PERFORMANCE Probe

Focus: System performance and resource usage

  • API endpoint response times (p50, p95, p99)
  • Error rate percentage by endpoint
  • Database query performance
  • Cache hit rates
  • Memory and CPU utilization
  • Request throughput (req/sec)

AGENTS Probe

Focus: Agent execution performance

  • Agent success rate by archetype
  • Average execution time by agent type
  • Token usage per agent (min/avg/max)
  • Timeout incident count
  • Spawn latency metrics
  • Agent health status

TRENDS Probe

Focus: Temporal patterns and anomalies

  • Week-over-week metric changes
  • Month-over-month comparisons
  • Identified anomalies (>3σ from baseline)
  • Seasonal patterns detected
  • Emerging trends (improving/degrading)
  • Correlation analysis across metrics

Deployment Pattern

Standard Deployment: 6 SIGNAL Probes

Deploy 6 SIGNAL probes in parallel:

SIGNAL ProbeTarget DomainMCP Tools Used
SIGNAL-SCHEDULINGScheduling performancegenerate_schedule, validate_schedule, detect_conflicts
SIGNAL-RESILIENCEResilience healthcheck_utilization_threshold, analyze_n1_contingency, get_defense_level
SIGNAL-COMPLIANCEACGME compliancevalidate_schedule (ACGME rules), compliance audit tools
SIGNAL-PERFORMANCESystem metricsAPI health checks, database performance queries
SIGNAL-AGENTSAgent performanceAgent execution logs, session metrics
SIGNAL-TRENDSTime seriesHistorical data analysis, baseline comparisons

Invocation

Full Deployment (6 probes)

/signal-party

Deploys all 6 SIGNAL probes in parallel.

Targeted Deployment (specific domain)

/signal-party resilience
/signal-party scheduling
/signal-party compliance

Deploys single probe for specific domain.

Quick Metrics (3 critical probes)

/signal-party --quick

Deploys 3 critical probes (SCHEDULING, RESILIENCE, COMPLIANCE).


IDE Crash Prevention (CRITICAL)

DO NOT have ORCHESTRATOR spawn 6 SIGNAL probes directly. This causes IDE seizure and crashes.

CORRECT Pattern:

ORCHESTRATOR → spawns 1 G6_SIGNAL (G-6 Commander)
                    ↓
              G6_SIGNAL deploys 6 probes internally
              (manages parallelism, synthesizes results)

WRONG Pattern:

ORCHESTRATOR → spawns 6 SIGNAL probes directly → IDE CRASH

The G-6 Commander (G6_SIGNAL) absorbs the parallelism complexity. ORCHESTRATOR only ever spawns 1 coordinator.


Spawn Pattern

Via G6_SIGNAL Commander (CORRECT)

# ORCHESTRATOR spawns G6_SIGNAL who manages the 6 SIGNAL probes
Task(
    subagent_type="general-purpose",
    description="G6_SIGNAL: SIGNAL_PARTY Commander",
    prompt="""
## Agent: G6_SIGNAL (G-6 Commander)

You are the G-6 Signal Commander for SIGNAL_PARTY deployment.

## Mission
Deploy 6 SIGNAL probes in parallel. Each probe collects metrics from a different domain.
Collect all reports and synthesize into unified metrics dashboard.

## Your SIGNAL Probes to Deploy
1. SIGNAL-SCHEDULING
2. SIGNAL-RESILIENCE
3. SIGNAL-COMPLIANCE
4. SIGNAL-PERFORMANCE
5. SIGNAL-AGENTS
6. SIGNAL-TRENDS

## Spawn each using Task tool with subagent_type="Explore"

## After all report back:
1. Cross-reference metrics
2. Flag anomalies and trends
3. Generate consolidated dashboard
4. Report to ORCHESTRATOR
"""
)

Direct Deployment (Only if G6_SIGNAL unavailable)

# Deploy all 6 SIGNAL probes in parallel
# WARNING: Only use if spawning from within a coordinator, NOT from ORCHESTRATOR
# Total: 6 probes, wall-clock = single probe timeout

spawn_parallel([
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-SCHEDULING",
         prompt="Collect scheduling metrics: solver time, violations, coverage, fairness"),
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-RESILIENCE",
         prompt="Collect resilience metrics: defense level, utilization, N-1/N-2, circuit breakers"),
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-COMPLIANCE",
         prompt="Collect ACGME compliance metrics: 80-hour violations, 1-in-7 status, trends"),
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-PERFORMANCE",
         prompt="Collect system performance: response times, error rates, resource usage"),
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-AGENTS",
         prompt="Collect agent metrics: success rates, execution time, token usage"),
    Task(subagent_type="Explore", description="SIGNAL-TRENDS",
         prompt="Analyze trends: week-over-week, anomalies, patterns, correlations"),
])

Metrics Synthesis

After all 6 SIGNAL probes report back:

  1. Cross-reference metrics across domains
  2. Flag anomalies (metrics >3σ from baseline)
  3. Identify trends (improving/stable/degrading)
  4. Detect correlations (e.g., utilization → defense level)
  5. Generate consolidated dashboard

Cross-Domain Analysis

Key Insight: Same timeframe, different lenses. Correlations between domains are high-signal:

Correlation TypeSignal Meaning
SCHEDULING slow, RESILIENCE degradingSolver struggling with tight constraints
COMPLIANCE violations up, UTILIZATION highApproaching 80% threshold causing violations
PERFORMANCE slow, AGENTS timing outSystem resource contention affecting agents
TRENDS anomaly, RESILIENCE defense level changeSystem responded to emerging pattern
SCHEDULING violations, COMPLIANCE cleanValidation gap or recent fix deployed

Output Format

Per-Probe Report

## SIGNAL Probe: [DOMAIN]

### Status: [GREEN/YELLOW/RED]

### Key Metrics
- [Metric 1]: [value] [trend arrow]
- [Metric 2]: [value] [vs. baseline]

### Anomalies Detected
- [Metric] at [value] (expected [baseline range])

### Trend Analysis
- [Metric] [improving/degrading] at [rate]

### Data Quality
- Sources: [list]
- Confidence: [%]

Consolidated Dashboard

## SIGNAL_PARTY Metrics Dashboard (6 Probes Deployed)

| Domain | Status | Key Metric | Trend | Priority Findings |
|--------|--------|------------|-------|-------------------|
| Scheduling | GREEN | Solver: 2.3s avg | Stable | 3 coverage gaps |
| Resilience | YELLOW | Utilization: 76% | Up 4% | Approaching threshold |
| Compliance | GREEN | 100% compliant | Stable | 0 violations |
| Performance | GREEN | API: 120ms p95 | Down 10% | Improved cache hit |
| Agents | GREEN | 96% success | Stable | 2 timeout incidents |
| Trends | YELLOW | Utilization rising | Linear | Projected breach in 2 weeks |

### Cross-Domain Correlations
[High-signal findings where metrics across domains correlate]

### Anomalies Flagged
[Metrics >3σ from baseline with context]

### Trending Issues
[What's improving or degrading with projections]

### Recommended Actions
1. [Highest priority based on data]
2. [Next priority]

### Data Quality
- Time range: [range]
- Sources: [N sources queried]
- Confidence: [%]

MCP Tool Integration

SIGNAL_PARTY uses MCP tools for data collection:

Scheduling Metrics

  • generate_schedule - Trigger test generation for timing
  • validate_schedule - Check constraint violations
  • detect_conflicts - Identify coverage gaps
  • analyze_swap_candidates - Swap feasibility metrics

Resilience Metrics

  • check_utilization_threshold_tool - Utilization percentage
  • analyze_n1_contingency_tool - N-1 coverage status
  • analyze_n2_contingency_tool - N-2 coverage status
  • get_unified_critical_index_tool - Overall risk score
  • check_defense_level_tool - Current defense level
  • get_circuit_breaker_state_tool - Circuit breaker status
  • calculate_burnout_rt_tool - Burnout reproduction rate

Compliance Metrics

  • validate_schedule (ACGME mode) - Rule violations
  • Audit trail queries - Historical compliance

Performance Metrics

  • System logs - API response times, error rates
  • Database queries - Query performance, connection pool
  • Resource monitoring - CPU, memory, disk usage

Agent Metrics

  • Session files - Agent execution records
  • Execution traces - Success/failure, timing, tokens

Trend Analysis

  • Historical data - Baseline comparisons
  • Statistical analysis - Anomaly detection, correlation

Timeout Profiles

ProfileDurationBest For
DASH45sQuick triage, status check
STANDARD90sNormal metrics collection (default)
DEEP180sComprehensive analysis, trend correlation

Failure Recovery

Minimum Viable Metrics

Mission can proceed if:

  • SCHEDULING (baseline performance) ✓
  • RESILIENCE (system health) ✓
  • COMPLIANCE (regulatory status) ✓
  • At least 1 of remaining 3 probes

Circuit Breaker

If > 2 consecutive probe failures: Trip to OPEN state, fall back to direct MCP tool calls.


Integration with Other Protocols

With SEARCH_PARTY (G-2 Recon)

SEARCH_PARTY discovers code/architecture
    ↓
SIGNAL_PARTY collects performance data
    ↓
Combined intel informs decisions

With PLAN_PARTY (G-5 Planning)

SIGNAL_PARTY provides baseline metrics
    ↓
PLAN_PARTY uses data for strategy
    ↓
Post-execution: SIGNAL_PARTY validates results

With QA_PARTY (IG Validation)

QA_PARTY runs tests
    ↓
SIGNAL_PARTY collects test metrics
    ↓
AGENTS probe tracks test performance

Command Structure

Oversight Hierarchy

Metrics collection falls under G-6 SIGNAL function:

ORCHESTRATOR (you)
    └── G6_SIGNAL (G-6 Commander - Signal/Data Processing)
            ├── SIGNAL-SCHEDULING (6 metrics collectors)
            ├── SIGNAL-RESILIENCE (6 metrics collectors)
            ├── SIGNAL-COMPLIANCE (6 metrics collectors)
            ├── SIGNAL-PERFORMANCE (6 metrics collectors)
            ├── SIGNAL-AGENTS (6 metrics collectors)
            └── SIGNAL-TRENDS (6 metrics collectors)
                    = 36 parallel metrics collectors

Staff Distinction:

  • G-2 (SEARCH_PARTY): Intelligence/Reconnaissance - explores code and architecture
  • G-6 (SIGNAL_PARTY): Signal Corps - collects metrics and performance data
  • G-5 (PLAN_PARTY): Plans - uses intel and metrics for strategy

Escalation Rules

SituationEscalate ToReason
Critical threshold breachORCHESTRATORImmediate action required
Defense level RED or BLACKORCHESTRATOR + COORD_RESILIENCEEmergency response
Compliance violationsSYNTHESIZER + COMPLIANCE_AUDITORRegulatory implications
Anomaly pattern detectedSYNTHESIZERInterpretation needed
Data interpretation neededDomain expertG-6 collects, doesn't interpret
Trend requires investigationDEVCOM_RESEARCHAdvanced analysis

Success Criteria

Successful Metrics Collection:

  • Data accuracy: >95% validation pass rate
  • Completeness: >90% of expected sources covered
  • Timeliness: Dashboard generated within timeout
  • Clarity: Metrics presented with context and trends
  • Provenance: All data sources documented

Successful Pattern Detection:

  • Sensitivity: Identifies anomalies at >2σ level
  • Specificity: False positive rate <5%
  • Actionability: Flagged issues include context
  • Cross-domain: Correlations identified

SkillWhen to Use
search-partyCode/architecture reconnaissance (G-2 function)
plan-partyStrategic planning using metrics (G-5 function)
qa-partyValidation and testing (IG function)
resilience-dashboardInteractive resilience-specific dashboard
schedule-validatorDeep schedule validation
systematic-debuggerWhen metrics reveal issues to debug

Protocol Reference

Full protocol documentation: .claude/Agents/G6_SIGNAL.md

Related documentation:

  • .claude/dontreadme/reconnaissance/OVERNIGHT_BURN/SESSION_8_MCP/mcp-tools-resilience.md
  • .claude/dontreadme/reconnaissance/OVERNIGHT_BURN/SESSION_8_MCP/mcp-tools-analytics.md
  • docs/architecture/cross-disciplinary-resilience.md

SIGNAL_PARTY: Six lenses, one timeframe, data-driven decisions. The correlations are the signal.

Score

Total Score

60/100

Based on repository quality metrics

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

Reviews

💬

Reviews coming soon