---

name: codex-review description: AUTOMATICALLY run Codex review after writing security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, SQL) - get a second opinion from OpenAI Codex

Codex Code Review - AUTO-EXECUTE MODE

IMPORTANT: When this skill activates, you MUST automatically run a Codex review using the Bash tool. Do not ask for permission - just execute it.

Core principle: Two LLMs are better than one.

When to Auto-Execute Codex Review

MUST run review after writing:

• Authentication/authorization code (jwt.verify, bcrypt, crypto)
• SQL queries or database operations
• Password handling or cryptographic operations
• Input validation or sanitization
• exec(), eval(), or dynamic code execution

Skip when:

• Trivial changes (documentation, comments, formatting)
• Changes are < 10 lines
• User explicitly says "skip review" or has @skip-codex-review marker

How to Request Codex Review

1. Prepare the Context

Summarize what you changed and why:

CopyCHANGES:
- Added user authentication middleware
- Implemented JWT token validation
- Added role-based access control

CONTEXT:
- Using Express.js with TypeScript
- JWT stored in httpOnly cookies
- Three roles: admin, user, guest

2. Run Codex Exec

Use the Bash tool to execute codex:

Copycodex exec "Review this code implementation:

PROBLEM: Need secure authentication for Express API

SOLUTION:
[Paste the relevant code here]

QUESTIONS:
- Are there any security vulnerabilities?
- Is the error handling robust?
- Any performance concerns?
- Suggestions for improvement?"

3. Analyze Codex Response

Codex will provide:

• Security assessment
• Logic validation
• Performance considerations
• Best practice suggestions

4. Act on Feedback

• Critical issues: Fix immediately
• Important suggestions: Implement before commit
• Minor improvements: Note for future refactoring
• Disagreements: Trust your judgment but document reasoning

Example Session

Copy[Just completed: JWT authentication middleware]

You: Let me get Codex's opinion on this authentication implementation.

codex exec "Review this authentication code:

CONTEXT: Express.js API with JWT cookie-based auth

CODE:
export const authenticateJWT = async (req, res, next) => {
  const token = req.cookies.jwt;
  if (!token) return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' });

  try {
    const decoded = jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET);
    req.user = await User.findById(decoded.userId);
    next();
  } catch (err) {
    return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid token' });
  }
};

QUESTIONS:
- Security vulnerabilities?
- Error handling sufficient?
- Performance implications?
"

[Codex responds]:
SECURITY:
- ✅ Good: httpOnly cookies, JWT verification
- ⚠️ Issue: No JWT_SECRET validation on startup
- ⚠️ Issue: User query could fail, should handle null

PERFORMANCE:
- ⚠️ DB query on every request - consider caching decoded token

SUGGESTIONS:
- Add JWT_SECRET existence check at startup
- Handle null user case
- Consider Redis for token caching
- Add rate limiting

You: [Fix critical issues: JWT_SECRET check, null user handling]
You: [Note for later: token caching, rate limiting]

Integration with Existing Workflows

With code-reviewer subagent:

• Use code-reviewer for architectural review
• Use codex-review for security/implementation details
• Complementary perspectives

With TDD:

• Write tests first
• Implement code
• Run codex-review before commit
• Fix issues, ensure tests still pass

With git workflow:

• Make changes
• Run codex-review
• Fix issues
• Commit with confidence

Skip Conditions

Automatic skip:

• File contains @skip-codex-review comment
• Environment variable: SKIP_CODEX_REVIEW=1
• Session tracking: Won't nag repeatedly

Manual skip:

• Simply proceed without running codex
• Skill is suggestive, not blocking

Tips for Effective Codex Reviews

1. Be specific in prompts:

Copy# Good
codex exec "Review for SQL injection vulnerabilities in this query builder"

# Less effective
codex exec "Review this code"

2. Provide context:

• What problem are you solving?
• What constraints exist?
• What specific concerns do you have?

3. Focus reviews:

• Security review
• Performance review
• Logic review
• Best practices review

4. Batch related changes:

• Review 3-5 related files together
• Show how they interact
• Get holistic feedback

Common Patterns

Security Review

Copycodex exec "Security review for authentication code:
[code]
Focus on: injection attacks, token handling, timing attacks"

Performance Review

Copycodex exec "Performance review for data processing:
[code]
Focus on: algorithmic complexity, database queries, memory usage"

Logic Review

Copycodex exec "Logic review for workflow engine:
[code]
Focus on: edge cases, state transitions, error paths"

Red Flags (When to ALWAYS use Codex)

• Authentication/authorization code
• Data validation logic
• SQL query construction
• File system operations
• Cryptographic operations
• Regular expressions
• Parsing user input
• Rate limiting/throttling

Benefits

✅ Catch blind spots: Different LLM, different perspective ✅ No blocking: Suggestion only, no workflow disruption ✅ Fast: 2-10 seconds for review ✅ Cost-effective: Single API call for entire changeset ✅ Learning: See alternative approaches and patterns

---

Remember: Codex review is advisory. Use your engineering judgment for final decisions.