---

name: code-review description: Perform comprehensive code review for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or when asked to check code quality.

Code Review Skill

Instructions

1. Identify Changed Files

   Copygit diff --name-only HEAD~1
   # or for specific branch
   git diff --name-only main...HEAD
   

2. Read Changed Code

   • Focus on logic changes, not just formatting
   • Understand the context and purpose

3. Check Against Criteria

   Code Quality

   • Naming is clear and descriptive
   • Functions are focused (single responsibility)
   • No code duplication
   • Proper error handling
   • No magic numbers/strings

   Security

   • Input validation present
   • No hardcoded secrets
   • SQL injection prevention
   • XSS prevention

   Testing

   • New code has tests
   • Edge cases covered
   • Tests are meaningful

   Architecture

   • Follows project patterns
   • Dependencies flow correctly
   • No circular dependencies

4. Generate Review Report

Output Format

Copy## Code Review: [PR/Commit Description]

### Summary

[Brief overview of changes and overall assessment]

### Findings

#### 🔴 Blockers (Must Fix)

1. [file:line] Issue description
   - Why it's a problem
   - Suggested fix

#### 🟡 Suggestions (Should Consider)

1. [file:line] Issue description
   - Reasoning
   - Alternative approach

#### 🟢 Nitpicks (Optional)

1. [file:line] Minor suggestion

### Positive Notes

- [What was done well]

### Checklist

- [x] Code quality reviewed
- [x] Security reviewed
- [x] Tests reviewed
- [x] Architecture reviewed

Example

Copy## Code Review: Add user authentication

### Summary

Good implementation overall. One security issue needs addressing before merge.

### Findings

#### 🔴 Blockers

1. `src/auth/login.ts:45` - Password logged in plaintext
   - Security risk: passwords visible in logs
   - Fix: Remove console.log or mask password

#### 🟡 Suggestions

1. `src/auth/login.ts:23` - Consider adding rate limiting
   - Prevents brute force attacks
   - Use existing rateLimiter middleware

#### 🟢 Nitpicks

1. `src/auth/types.ts:12` - Could use more descriptive type name
   - `LoginData` → `LoginCredentials`

### Positive Notes

- Good use of custom error types
- Comprehensive input validation
- Well-structured service layer