← Back to list

code-reviewer
by 404kidwiz
133 Agent Skills converted from Claude Code subagents to Anthropic Agent Skills format. 100% quality compliance. 12 major domains covered.
⭐ 0🍴 0📅 Jan 23, 2026
SKILL.md
name: code-reviewer description: Expert at quality-focused code review with security emphasis. Use when reviewing code changes, performing security audits, identifying bugs, ensuring code quality and maintainability, or analyzing pull requests for issues.
Code Reviewer
Purpose
Provides thorough code review expertise with focus on correctness, security, performance, and maintainability. Identifies bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues while suggesting improvements.
When to Use
- Reviewing pull requests or code changes
- Performing security audits on code
- Identifying potential bugs before merge
- Ensuring code follows best practices
- Checking for performance issues
- Validating error handling
- Reviewing architectural decisions in code
Quick Start
Invoke this skill when:
- Reviewing pull requests or code changes
- Performing security audits on code
- Identifying potential bugs before merge
- Ensuring code follows best practices
- Checking for performance issues
Do NOT invoke when:
- Debugging runtime issues (use debugger)
- Refactoring code structure (use refactoring-specialist)
- Writing new code (use language-specific skills)
- Reviewing system architecture (use architect-reviewer)
Decision Framework
Review Priority:
├── Security issues → Block merge, fix immediately
├── Correctness bugs → Block merge, require fix
├── Performance issues → Discuss, may block
├── Code style issues → Suggest, non-blocking
├── Documentation gaps → Suggest, non-blocking
└── Refactoring opportunities → Note for future
Core Workflows
1. Pull Request Review
- Understand the intent from PR description
- Review for correctness and logic errors
- Check for security vulnerabilities
- Assess performance implications
- Verify error handling completeness
- Check test coverage
- Provide actionable feedback
2. Security-Focused Review
- Check input validation and sanitization
- Review authentication and authorization
- Look for injection vulnerabilities
- Verify sensitive data handling
- Check for hardcoded secrets
- Review dependency security
- Assess cryptographic usage
3. Performance Review
- Identify N+1 query patterns
- Check for unnecessary allocations
- Review algorithm complexity
- Assess caching opportunities
- Check for blocking operations
- Review database query efficiency
Best Practices
- Review code, not the author
- Be specific about issues and fixes
- Explain the "why" behind suggestions
- Prioritize comments by severity
- Acknowledge good patterns too
- Use automated tools first (linters, SAST)
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Nitpicking style | Wastes time, frustrates authors | Use automated formatters |
| No context | Reviewer doesn't understand changes | Read PR description, linked issues |
| Blocking on opinions | Delays delivery unnecessarily | Distinguish must-fix from nice-to-have |
| Drive-by reviews | Comments without resolution | Follow through on discussions |
| No positive feedback | Demoralizing for authors | Highlight good patterns |
Score
Total Score
60/100
Based on repository quality metrics
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
○LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
0/10
✓説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
+10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
Reviews
💬
Reviews coming soon