
ai-prompt-engineering
by vasilyu1983
SKILL.md
name: ai-prompt-engineering description: Operational prompt engineering patterns, templates, and validation flows for Claude Code.
Prompt Engineering — Operational Skill
Modern Best Practices (December 2025): versioned prompts, explicit output contracts, regression tests, and safety threat modeling for tool/RAG prompts (OWASP LLM Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/).
This skill provides operational guidance for building production-ready prompts across standard tasks, RAG workflows, agent orchestration, structured outputs, hidden reasoning, and multi-step planning.
All content is operational, not theoretical. Focus on patterns, checklists, and copy-paste templates.
Claude 4+ Updates: This skill includes Claude 4.x and 4.5-specific optimizations:
- Action directives: Frame for implementation, not suggestions
- Parallel tool execution: Independent tool calls can run simultaneously
- Long-horizon task management: State tracking, incremental progress, context compaction resilience
- Positive framing: Describe desired behavior rather than prohibitions
- Style matching: Prompt formatting influences output style
- Domain-specific patterns: Specialized guidance for frontend, research, and agentic coding
- Style-adversarial resilience: Stress-test refusals with poetic/role-play rewrites; normalize or decline stylized harmful asks before tool use
Claude 4.5 Communication: Claude 4.5 is more concise by default. Request explicit summaries when needed for visibility into reasoning or work completed.
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when the user asks to:
- Write or improve a production-ready prompt
- Debug prompt failures or inconsistent outputs
- Create structured outputs (JSON, tables, schemas)
- Build deterministic extractors
- Design RAG pipelines with context grounding
- Implement agent workflows with tool calling
- Add hidden reasoning (CoT) without visible output
- Convert user tasks into reusable templates
- Validate prompt quality against operational checklists
- Standardize output formats across systems
Do NOT use this skill for:
- LLM theory or model architecture explanations
- General educational content about AI
- Historical background on prompt engineering
See Also: For specialized AI/LLM implementations, see "Related Skills" section at the end of this document.
Quick Reference
| Task | Pattern to Use | Key Components | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machine-parseable output | Structured Output | JSON schema, "JSON-only" directive, no prose | API integrations, data extraction |
| Field extraction | Deterministic Extractor | Exact schema, missing→null, no transformations | Form data, invoice parsing |
| Use retrieved context | RAG Workflow | Context relevance check, chunk citations, explicit missing info | Knowledge bases, documentation search |
| Internal reasoning | Hidden Chain-of-Thought | Internal reasoning, final answer only | Classification, complex decisions |
| Tool-using agent | Tool/Agent Planner | Plan-then-act, one tool per turn | Multi-step workflows, API calls |
| Text transformation | Rewrite + Constrain | Style rules, meaning preservation, format spec | Content adaptation, summarization |
| Classification | Decision Tree | Ordered branches, mutually exclusive, JSON result | Routing, categorization, triage |
Decision Tree: Choosing the Right Pattern
User needs: [Prompt Type]
├─ Output must be machine-readable?
│ ├─ Extract specific fields only? → **Deterministic Extractor Pattern**
│ └─ Generate structured data? → **Structured Output Pattern (JSON)**
│
├─ Use external knowledge?
│ └─ Retrieved context must be cited? → **RAG Workflow Pattern**
│
├─ Requires reasoning but hide process?
│ └─ Classification or decision task? → **Hidden Chain-of-Thought Pattern**
│
├─ Needs to call external tools/APIs?
│ └─ Multi-step workflow? → **Tool/Agent Planner Pattern**
│
├─ Transform existing text?
│ └─ Style/format constraints? → **Rewrite + Constrain Pattern**
│
└─ Classify or route to categories?
└─ Mutually exclusive rules? → **Decision Tree Pattern**
Context Engineering (2026)
True expertise in prompting extends beyond writing instructions to shaping the entire context in which the model operates. Context engineering encompasses:
- Conversation history: What prior turns inform the current response
- Retrieved context (RAG): External knowledge injected into the prompt
- Structured inputs: JSON schemas, system/user message separation
- Tool outputs: Results from previous tool calls that shape next steps
Context Engineering vs Prompt Engineering
| Aspect | Prompt Engineering | Context Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Instruction text | Full input pipeline |
| Scope | Single prompt | RAG + history + tools |
| Optimization | Word choice, structure | Information architecture |
| Goal | Clear instructions | Optimal context window |
Key Context Engineering Patterns
1. Context Prioritization: Place most relevant information first; models attend more strongly to early context.
2. Context Compression: Summarize history, truncate tool outputs, select most relevant RAG chunks.
3. Context Separation: Use clear delimiters (<system>, <user>, <context>) to separate instruction types.
4. Dynamic Context: Adjust context based on task complexity—simple tasks need less context, complex tasks need more.
Core Concepts vs Implementation Practices
Core Concepts (Vendor-Agnostic)
- Prompt contract: inputs, allowed tools, output schema, max tokens, and refusal rules.
- Context engineering: conversation history, RAG context, tool outputs, and structured inputs shape model behavior.
- Determinism controls: temperature/top_p, constrained decoding/structured outputs, and strict formatting.
- Cost & latency budgets: prompt length and max output drive tokens and tail latency; enforce hard limits and measure p95/p99.
- Evaluation: golden sets + regression gates + A/B + post-deploy monitoring.
- Security: prompt injection, data exfiltration, and tool misuse are primary threats (OWASP LLM Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/).
Implementation Practices (Model/Platform-Specific)
- Use model-specific structured output features when available; keep a schema validator as the source of truth.
- Align tracing/metrics with OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions (https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/).
Do / Avoid
Do
- Do keep prompts small and modular; centralize shared fragments (policies, schemas, style).
- Do add a prompt eval harness and block merges on regressions.
- Do prefer “brief justification” over requesting chain-of-thought; treat hidden reasoning as model-internal.
Avoid
- Avoid prompt sprawl (many near-duplicates with no owner or tests).
- Avoid brittle multi-step chains without intermediate validation.
- Avoid mixing policy and product copy in the same prompt (harder to audit and update).
Navigation: Core Patterns
- Core Patterns - 7 production-grade prompt patterns
- Structured Output (JSON), Deterministic Extractor, RAG Workflow
- Hidden Chain-of-Thought, Tool/Agent Planner, Rewrite + Constrain, Decision Tree
- Each pattern includes structure template and validation checklist
Navigation: Best Practices
-
Best Practices (Core) - Foundation rules for production-grade prompts
- System instruction design, output contract specification, action directives
- Context handling, error recovery, positive framing, style matching, style-adversarial red teaming
- Anti-patterns, Claude 4+ specific optimizations
-
Production Guidelines - Deployment and operational guidance
- Evaluation & testing (Prompt CI/CD), model parameters, few-shot selection
- Safety & guardrails, conversation memory, context compaction resilience
- Answer engineering, decomposition, multilingual/multimodal, benchmarking
- CI/CD Tools (2026): Promptfoo, DeepEval integration patterns
- Security (2026): PromptGuard 4-layer defense, Microsoft Prompt Shields, taint tracking
-
Quality Checklists - Validation checklists before deployment
- Prompt QA, JSON validation, agent workflow checks
- RAG workflow, safety & security, performance optimization
- Testing coverage, anti-patterns, quality score rubric
-
Domain-Specific Patterns - Claude 4+ optimized patterns for specialized domains
- Frontend/visual code: Creativity encouragement, design variations, micro-interactions
- Research tasks: Success criteria, verification, hypothesis tracking
- Agentic coding: No speculation rule, principled implementation, investigation patterns
- Cross-domain best practices and quality modifiers
Navigation: Specialized Patterns
-
RAG Patterns - Retrieval-augmented generation workflows
- Context grounding, chunk citation, missing information handling
-
Agent and Tool Patterns - Tool use and agent orchestration
- Plan-then-act workflows, tool calling, multi-step reasoning, generate–verify–revise chains
- Multi-Agent Orchestration (2026): centralized, handoff, federated patterns; plan-and-execute (90% cost reduction)
-
Extraction Patterns - Deterministic field extraction
- Schema-based extraction, null handling, no hallucinations
-
Reasoning Patterns (Hidden CoT) - Internal reasoning without visible output
- Hidden reasoning, final answer only, classification workflows
- Extended Thinking API (Claude 4+): budget management, think tool, multishot patterns
-
Additional Patterns - Extended prompt engineering techniques
- Advanced patterns, edge cases, optimization strategies
Navigation: Templates
Templates are copy-paste ready and organized by complexity:
Quick Templates
- Quick Template - Fast, minimal prompt structure
Standard Templates
- Standard Template - Production-grade operational prompt
- Agent Template - Tool-using agent with planning
- RAG Template - Retrieval-augmented generation
- Chain-of-Thought Template - Hidden reasoning pattern
- JSON Extractor Template - Deterministic field extraction
- Prompt Evaluation Template - Regression tests, A/B testing, rollout gates
External Resources
External references are listed in data/sources.json:
- Official documentation (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google)
- LLM frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex)
- Vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, FAISS)
- Evaluation tools (OpenAI Evals, HELM)
- Safety guides and standards
- RAG and retrieval resources
Trend Awareness Protocol
IMPORTANT: When users ask recommendation questions about prompt engineering, you MUST use WebSearch to check current trends before answering.
Trigger Conditions
- "What's the best prompting technique for [use case]?"
- "What should I use for [structured output/reasoning/agents]?"
- "What's the latest in prompt engineering?"
- "Current best practices for [chain-of-thought/few-shot/system prompts]?"
- "Is [prompting technique] still effective in 2026?"
- "How do I prompt [Claude 4/GPT-4.5/Gemini 2]?"
- "Best way to get reliable [JSON/structured output]?"
Required Searches
- Search:
"prompt engineering best practices 2026" - Search:
"[Claude/GPT/Gemini] prompting techniques 2026" - Search:
"prompt engineering trends January 2026" - Search:
"[reasoning/structured output/agents] prompting 2026"
What to Report
After searching, provide:
- Current landscape: What prompting techniques work best NOW (model-specific)
- Emerging trends: New techniques gaining traction (thinking tokens, etc.)
- Deprecated/declining: Techniques that no longer work well on new models
- Recommendation: Based on fresh data and model-specific documentation
Example Topics (verify with fresh search)
- Model-specific prompting (Claude 4.x, GPT-4.5, Gemini 2.x)
- Reasoning techniques (extended thinking, chain-of-thought variants)
- Structured output (JSON mode, function calling, tool use)
- Agent prompting patterns (ReAct, plan-and-execute)
- Safety and guardrails in prompts
- Evaluation and testing of prompts
Related Skills
This skill provides foundational prompt engineering patterns. For specialized implementations:
AI/LLM Skills:
- AI Agents Development - Production agent patterns, MCP integration, orchestration
- AI LLM Engineering - LLM application architecture and deployment
- AI LLM RAG Engineering - Advanced RAG pipelines and chunking strategies
- AI LLM Search & Retrieval - Search optimization, hybrid retrieval, reranking
- AI LLM Development - Fine-tuning, evaluation, dataset creation
Software Development Skills:
- Software Architecture Design - System design patterns
- Software Backend - Backend implementation
- Foundation API Design - API design and contracts
Usage Notes
For Claude Code:
- Reference this skill when building prompts for agents, commands, or integrations
- Use Quick Reference table for fast pattern lookup
- Follow Decision Tree to select appropriate pattern
- Validate outputs with Quality Checklists before deployment
- Use templates as starting points, customize for specific use cases
スコア
総合スコア
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
レビュー
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です