---

name: refactor description: Suggests and performs code refactoring following best practices. Use when user asks to "리팩토링 해줘", "refactor this", "코드 개선해줘", "정리해줘", "클린 코드로", "중복 제거해줘", "이거 더 깔끔하게", or wants to improve code quality without changing functionality. allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Edit, Write, Bash(git diff:), Bash(git status:) version: 1.0.0

Refactor Skill

This skill suggests and performs code refactoring following best practices.

Source of Truth

• Output Format: output-formats.md (Refactoring Format)
• Success Criteria: quality-assurance.md (Refactoring Criteria)

When to Activate

This skill activates in these scenarios:

1. Explicit request: "리팩토링 해줘", "refactor this"
2. Improvement request: "코드 개선해줘", "정리해줘"
3. Clean code request: "클린 코드로", "이거 더 깔끔하게"
4. Specific refactoring: "중복 제거해줘", "함수 분리해줘"

Refactoring Principles

• Preserve functionality: Tests must pass before and after
• Small steps: Make incremental changes, verify each step
• Improve readability: Code should be easier to understand
• Reduce complexity: Lower cyclomatic complexity when possible
• Remove duplication: DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)

Instructions

Step 1: Analyze Current State

1. Read the target code thoroughly

2. Identify issues:

   • Long functions (>30 lines)
   • High complexity (>10 cyclomatic)
   • Code duplication
   • Unclear naming
   • Deep nesting
   • God classes/functions

3. Check for existing tests

Step 2: Plan Refactoring

Determine the refactoring type:

Step 3: Perform Refactoring

1. Before changing: Ensure tests exist and pass
2. Make one change at a time: Don't combine multiple refactorings
3. Verify after each change: Run tests if available
4. Show Before/After: Clear comparison of changes

Step 4: Format Output

Use this structured format:

Copy## 리팩토링 제안

### 📊 현재 상태 분석

**문제점**:
- [Issue 1]
- [Issue 2]
- [Issue 3]

**메트릭**:
- 함수 길이: [N lines]
- 복잡도: [N]
- 중복 코드: [N occurrences]

---

## 개선 방안

### Before
\`\`\`[language]
[Current code]
\`\`\`

**문제점**: [What's wrong with this]

### After
\`\`\`[language]
[Refactored code]
\`\`\`

**개선사항**:
- ✅ [Improvement 1]
- ✅ [Improvement 2]
- ✅ [Improvement 3]

---

## 변경 영향 분석

### 영향받는 코드
- [File 1]: [How it's affected]
- [File 2]: [How it's affected]

### 호환성
- ✅ 기존 API 유지 / ⚠️ Breaking change

### 테스트 수정 필요
- [Test file 1]: [Required changes]

---

## 우선순위

**Priority**: [High/Medium/Low]
**Effort**: [Hours/Days]
**Impact**: [High/Medium/Low]

**권장**: [Yes/No and why]

Simplified Output (for small refactoring)

When the change is simple:

Copy## 리팩토링

### Before
\`\`\`[language]
[Current code]
\`\`\`

### After
\`\`\`[language]
[Refactored code]
\`\`\`

**개선**: [What improved]

Success Criteria

Before completing refactoring, verify:

• ✅ All tests still pass
• ✅ Functionality unchanged (verified by tests)
• ✅ Code complexity reduced or maintained
• ✅ No new bugs introduced
• ✅ Code readability improved

Common Refactoring Patterns

Extract Function

Copy**Before**: 50-line function doing multiple things
**After**: 3 focused functions of ~15 lines each
**Benefit**: Single responsibility, easier to test

Replace Conditional with Polymorphism

Copy**Before**: Switch/case with type checking
**After**: Interface with multiple implementations
**Benefit**: Open/Closed principle, easier to extend

Introduce Parameter Object

Copy**Before**: Function with 5+ parameters
**After**: Single object parameter with named properties
**Benefit**: Clearer API, easier to add optional params

Related Skills

After refactoring, you may want to:

• Review changes: Ask "리뷰해줘" or use /review
• Commit changes: Ask "커밋해줘" or use /commit

Important: Always ask user before committing. Never auto-commit.

Typical Workflow

Copy1. /refactor → 리팩토링 수행
2. "리뷰할까요?" → 사용자 선택 시 /review
3. "커밋할까요?" → 사용자 승인 시 /commit

Response Language

• Explanation and analysis: Korean (한국어)
• Code examples: English (comments, variable names)
• Technical terms: Keep in English (e.g., refactoring, DRY, SOLID)

See Also

• output-formats.md - Refactoring output format
• quality-assurance.md - Refactoring success criteria
• technical-standards.md - Code quality standards