スキル一覧に戻る
tienbm92

web-design-reviewer

by tienbm92

Personal AI context base used for bootstrapping new projects and feature development. Acts as the backbone for architecture, domain rules, and reusable design patterns.

0🍴 0📅 2026年1月26日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: web-design-reviewer description: 'Expert-level UI/UX design review. Phân tích design mockups, live websites để đưa ra actionable feedback về visual design, UX, accessibility, responsive design.'

Web Design Reviewer Skill

Skill này provide comprehensive design review methodology cho web designs, đưa ra expert-level feedback và actionable recommendations.

Khi Nào Sử Dụng

  • Review design mockups trước development
  • Analyze live websites cho improvements
  • Audit UI/UX của existing products
  • Prepare feedback cho design team
  • Validate accessibility compliance
  • Check responsive design implementation

Review Framework

1. First Impressions (5 giây đầu)

AspectQuestion
ClarityPurpose của page rõ ràng không?
HierarchyVisual priority có đúng không?
BrandCó nhận ra brand identity không?
TrustDesign có professional không?

2. Visual Design Analysis

Typography Review

  • Font pairing có harmonious không?
  • Hierarchy rõ ràng (H1 > H2 > body)?
  • Line height comfortable (1.4-1.6 cho body)?
  • Font sizes responsive?
  • Contrast đủ cho readability?

Color Review

  • Palette có cohesive không?
  • Contrast ratio đạt WCAG (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)?
  • Meaning của colors consistent?
  • Không rely chỉ vào color để convey information?
  • Dark/light mode supported?

Spacing & Layout

  • Spacing consistent (8px grid)?
  • White space adequate?
  • Visual grouping logical?
  • Content width comfortable (45-75 characters)?
  • Alignment precise?

Imagery & Icons

  • Images high quality, relevant?
  • Icon style consistent?
  • Alt text for images?
  • Loading states for media?

3. UX Analysis

Navigation

  • Nav structure intuitive?
  • Current location clear?
  • Breadcrumbs where needed?
  • Search easily accessible?
  • Mobile nav works well?

Interactions

  • Clickable areas obvious?
  • Hover/active states clear?
  • Loading feedback present?
  • Error states helpful?
  • Success confirmations clear?

Forms

  • Labels clear and visible?
  • Input validation helpful?
  • Error messages specific?
  • Required fields marked?
  • Auto-complete where appropriate?

4. Accessibility Audit

Visual

  • Color contrast WCAG AA
  • Text resizable to 200%
  • Focus indicators visible
  • No flashing content

Semantic

  • Proper heading hierarchy
  • ARIA labels where needed
  • Alt text meaningful
  • Skip links present

Interaction

  • Keyboard navigable
  • Touch targets 44px+
  • No hover-only content
  • Form labels associated

5. Responsive Review

BreakpointCheck
Mobile (375px)Touch-friendly, readable
Tablet (768px)Layout adapts, not just shrunk
Desktop (1280px)Uses space effectively
Wide (1920px+)Content not too stretched

Review Output Format

Summary

  • Overall score (1-10)
  • Top 3 strengths
  • Top 3 areas for improvement
  • Priority issues

Detailed Findings

## [Category]: [Issue Title]

**Severity**: High/Medium/Low
**Location**: [Page/Component]

**Issue**: 
[Description của problem]

**Impact**:
[Tại sao đây là problem]

**Recommendation**:
[Cách fix cụ thể]

**Reference**:
[Link to guideline/best practice]

Severity Levels

LevelCriteriaAction
CriticalBlocks users, accessibility violationFix immediately
HighSignificant UX issueFix before launch
MediumNotable improvementPlan to fix
LowNice-to-haveConsider for future

Review Checklist Quick Reference

Must Have (Critical)

  • Content readable
  • Navigation works
  • Forms functional
  • Mobile usable
  • Key actions accessible

Should Have (High)

  • Visual hierarchy clear
  • Feedback on actions
  • Error handling graceful
  • Loading states present
  • Consistent styling

Nice to Have (Medium/Low)

  • Micro-interactions
  • Animation polish
  • Edge case handling
  • Advanced accessibility
  • Performance optimization

Design Principles Reference

Visual Hierarchy

  1. Size - Larger = more important
  2. Color - Bolder/brighter = more important
  3. Position - Top/left = first seen
  4. Spacing - More white space = emphasis
  5. Typography - Weight and style differentiate

Gestalt Principles

  • Proximity - Group related items
  • Similarity - Similar appearance = related
  • Continuity - Eye follows lines/curves
  • Closure - Brain completes incomplete shapes
  • Figure/Ground - Distinguish foreground from background

F-Pattern & Z-Pattern

  • F-pattern for text-heavy pages
  • Z-pattern for minimal content
  • Place important elements in these scan paths

Common Issues Catalog

Typography Issues

IssueImpactFix
Too many fontsChaotic lookMax 2-3 fonts
Poor contrastHard to readMin 4.5:1 ratio
Long linesEye strainMax 75 characters
Tight spacingDense, hard to scanIncrease line height

Layout Issues

IssueImpactFix
No visual hierarchyConfusionSize/weight variation
Cramped spacingOverwhelming8px grid system
MisalignmentUnprofessionalStrict alignment grid
Inconsistent marginsDisjointedDesign tokens

UX Issues

IssueImpactFix
Hidden navigationLost usersVisible, clear nav
No feedbackUncertaintyLoading/success states
Unclear CTAsLow conversionClear, contrasting buttons
Complex formsAbandonmentProgressive disclosure

Tools for Review

ToolPurpose
Browser DevToolsInspect elements, test responsive
WAVEAccessibility audit
LighthousePerformance + accessibility
Contrast CheckerColor accessibility
ResponsivelyMulti-device preview

スコア

総合スコア

70/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です