スキル一覧に戻る
theflysurfer

julien-workflow-advice-gemini

by theflysurfer

Personal marketplace for developing and sharing custom Claude skills

1🍴 0📅 2026年1月21日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: julien-workflow-advice-gemini description: Get Gemini CLI's opinion on code, architecture, or implementation. Use when you want a second AI perspective during coding sessions. triggers:

  • "ask gemini"
  • "gemini opinion"
  • "gemini review"
  • "what does gemini think"
  • "demande à gemini"
  • "avis de gemini"
  • "gemini pense quoi"
  • "get gemini feedback"
  • "gemini second opinion"
  • "google gemini review"

Ask Gemini

Get feedback from Google's Gemini CLI on code, architecture decisions, or implementation approaches.

Prerequisites

Observability

First: At the start of execution, display:

🔧 Skill "julien-workflow-advice-gemini" activated
  • Gemini CLI installed: npm install -g @google/gemini-cli
  • Authenticated: run gemini once to login with Google account
  • Verify: gemini --version

When to Use

  • Want a second opinion on code quality
  • Need architectural review
  • Comparing implementation approaches
  • Code review before commit

How to Invoke

The user will ask something like:

  • "ask gemini what it thinks about this code"
  • "get gemini's opinion on this approach"
  • "demande à gemini de reviewer ce fichier"

Execution

For file review

gemini "Review this code and provide 3 specific improvements: $(cat <file_path>)"

For architectural questions

gemini "<user's question about architecture or approach>"

For comparing approaches

gemini "Compare these two approaches and recommend which is better: Approach A: <desc> vs Approach B: <desc>"

Output Format

Present Gemini's response clearly to the user. If Gemini suggests improvements, summarize them as actionable items.

Examples

File review

User: "demande à gemini ce qu'il pense du semantic-skill-router.py"

gemini "Review this Python script for a semantic routing system. List 3 improvements for production use: $(cat scripts/semantic-skill-router.py)"

Architecture question

User: "ask gemini if I should use Redis or in-memory cache"

gemini "Compare Redis vs in-memory caching for a CLI tool that routes user prompts. Consider: startup time, complexity, persistence needs."

Troubleshooting

ErrorCauseFix
gemini: command not foundCLI not installednpm install -g @google/gemini-cli
Authentication requiredNot logged inRun gemini interactively, login with Google
Response timeoutLarge file or slow networkReduce file size or retry
Rate limit exceededToo many requestsWait 1 minute, retry

Notes

  • Gemini has 1M token context window
  • Default model: Gemini 2.5 Pro
  • Timeout: allow up to 60s for response
  • If response is cut off, Gemini may still be processing

Skill Chaining

Input Expected

  • File path to review, OR
  • Architecture/design question from user

Output Produced

  • Format: Markdown feedback from Gemini
  • Side effects: None (read-only)

Compatible Skills

  • Can be used alongside julien-workflow-advice-codex for multiple AI opinions
  • Use after writing code, before commit

Tools Used

  • Bash (usage: run gemini CLI command, timeout 60s)

スコア

総合スコア

50/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

0/10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です