---

name: create-pr description: Create pull requests following good conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Emphasizes concise, helpful descriptions that respect reviewers' time.

Create Pull Request

Create pull requests that are easy to review and understand.

Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.

Core Principles

• Be concise: Respect reviewers' time - no fluff or unnecessary words
• Be helpful: Provide context that isn't obvious from the code
• Be clear: Explain what and why, not how (code shows how)
• Be focused: One PR per feature/fix - don't bundle unrelated changes

Change Discipline

• Write absolute minimum code required
• No sweeping changes
• No unrelated edits
• Stay focused on the specific task
• Don't break existing functionality without asking

Process

Step 1: Check for PR Template

Before creating the PR, check if the repository has a PR template:

Copy# Check for PR template files
ls -la .github/pull_request_template.md
ls -la .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
ls -la .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/*.md
ls -la docs/pull_request_template.md

If a template exists:

• Use the template structure
• Fill in all required sections
• Remove any sections marked as optional that don't apply
• Follow the template's formatting

If no template exists:

• Follow the structure outlined in this document
• Focus on being concise and helpful

Step 2: Verify Branch State

Copy# Check current branch and status
git status

# See what commits will be in the PR
git log main..HEAD --oneline

# Verify branch is pushed
git push -u origin HEAD

Ensure:

• All changes are committed
• Branch is pushed to remote
• Branch name follows conventions: <type>/<short-description> (e.g., feat/add-oauth, fix/null-pointer). See create-branch skill for details.
• No unintended changes are included
• Branch is up to date with base branch if needed

Step 3: Review Your Own Changes

Review the PR diff before creating it:

Copy# See all commits that will be in the PR
git log main..HEAD

# See the full diff
git diff main...HEAD

Self-review checklist:

• All commits are related to the same logical change
• No debug code, console.logs, or commented code
• No secrets or credentials
• Code follows project conventions
• Tests are included (if applicable)
• Documentation is updated (if needed)

Step 4: Write the PR Description

Writing principles:

• Concise and direct: Get to the point quickly
• Informative: Provide context reviewers need
• Scannable: Use short paragraphs and bullet points
• No redundancy: Don't repeat what's obvious from the diff

Description structure:

Copy<Brief 1-2 sentence summary of what this PR does>

<Why these changes are being made - the motivation and context>

<Any important details reviewers should know>

<Issue references>

Do include:

• Clear explanation of what and why
• Links to relevant issues or tickets
• Context that isn't obvious from the code
• Areas that need careful review
• Alternative approaches considered (if relevant)
• Breaking changes or migration steps
• Performance implications (if any)

Do NOT include:

• Verbose narratives or unnecessary backstory
• "Test plan" sections with checkbox lists
• Redundant summaries of the diff
• Obvious information already in the code
• Bullet points that just list file names changed
• Phrases like "In this PR, I have..." or "This PR is about..."

Step 5: Create the PR

Copy# Create PR with title and body
gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
<description body here>
EOF
)"

Title format follows commit conventions:

• feat(scope): Add new feature
• fix(scope): Fix the bug
• ref: Refactor something
• Maximum 72 characters
• Imperative mood, no period at end

Step 6: Add Reviewers and Labels

Copy# Request review from specific people
gh pr edit --add-reviewer username1,username2

# Or request from a team
gh pr edit --add-reviewer @team-name

# Add labels if applicable
gh pr edit --add-label bug,needs-review

Reviewer guidelines:

• Limit to 1-3 reviewers for clear ownership
• Tag specific people if certain expertise is needed
• Use draft PRs for early feedback before formal review

PR Description Examples

Feature PR

CopyAdd Slack thread replies for alert notifications

When an alert is updated or resolved, post a reply to the original Slack thread
instead of creating a new message. This keeps related notifications grouped and
reduces channel noise.

Previously considered editing the original message, but threading better
preserves event timeline and works beyond Slack's edit window.

Refs ENG-1234

Bug Fix PR

CopyHandle null response in user API endpoint

The user endpoint returns null for soft-deleted accounts, causing dashboard
crashes when accessing user.profile. Add null check and return proper 404
response instead.

Fixes ENG-5678

Refactor PR

CopyExtract validation logic to shared module

Move duplicate validation from alerts, issues, and projects endpoints into
shared validator class. No behavior change.

This prepares for adding new validation rules (ENG-9999) without duplicating
logic across endpoints.

Refs ENG-9999

Description Length Guidelines

Short PR (1-10 files, single commit):

• 2-4 sentences usually sufficient
• Focus on the "why"

Medium PR (10-50 files, multiple related commits):

• 1 paragraph + bullet points for key areas
• 50-100 words typical

Large PR (50+ files or architectural change):

• 2-3 paragraphs + bullet points
• 100-200 words maximum
• Consider if it should be split into smaller PRs

Rule of thumb: If your description is longer than 200 words, it's probably too verbose or the PR is too large.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

PR Templates

When a repository has a PR template, respect its structure:

Handling Optional Sections

Copy# If template has optional sections you don't need:

## Description

Add caching for search results

## Breaking Changes

None

## Testing

~~- [ ] Manual testing performed~~ # Remove if not applicable ~~- [ ] Added unit
tests~~ # Remove if not applicable

Better: Just omit optional sections entirely if they don't apply.

Adapting to Template Style

• If template asks for bullet points, use them
• If template asks for specific sections, include them
• If template is overly verbose, be concise within its structure
• Don't fight the template, but don't add fluff to fill it

Guidelines

PR Size

• Small PRs get reviewed faster: Aim for < 400 lines changed
• Split large changes: Multiple small PRs better than one huge PR
• One logical change per PR: Don't bundle unrelated changes

Draft PRs

Use draft PRs when:

• You want early feedback on approach
• Work is incomplete but you want visibility
• You need to verify CI passes before requesting review

Copygh pr create --draft --title "WIP: Feature name"

Convert to ready when complete:

Copygh pr ready

PR Updates

When pushing new commits after review:

• Add a comment summarizing what changed
• Don't force-push unless asked to squash
• Keep the PR description updated if scope changes

Copy# Add comment about updates
gh pr comment --body "Updated based on review feedback:
- Changed validation approach per @reviewer
- Added test case for edge case
- Fixed typo in documentation"

Issue References

Reference issues in the PR body:

Multiple issues:

CopyFixes ENG-1234 Refs ENG-5678, ENG-9012

Checklist Before Creating PR

• Branch is pushed to remote
• All commits are related to same logical change
• No debug code, secrets, or commented code
• Self-reviewed the diff
• Tests pass locally (if applicable)
• Checked for PR template in repository
• PR title follows commit conventions
• Description is concise but helpful
• Issue references are included
• Reviewers are assigned (if known)

Tool Usage

• Use gh pr create to create PRs from command line
• Use gh pr view to view PR details
• Use gh pr edit to modify title, body, reviewers, labels
• Use gh pr comment to add comments when pushing updates
• Use gh pr ready to convert draft to ready for review
• Use git diff main...HEAD to see full PR diff before creating