reviewing-ui-wording

---

name: reviewing-ui-wording description: "Reviews UI test scenarios for wording accuracy. Detects variables and dynamic values that cannot be verified from actual UI. Use as part of parallel UI test scenario review." allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob context: fork

Review criteria

Critical

• Variable syntax: expected text contains ${...}, {{...}}, %s, {0} patterns
• Dynamic values: timestamps, UUIDs, sequential IDs that change between runs
• Placeholder text: TODO, TBD, xxx, dummy values in expected results

Standard

• Technical terms: code-level terms not visible in actual UI
• Unverifiable descriptions: text that cannot be confirmed by looking at screen

Supplementary

• Ambiguous references: "the value" instead of specific UI label

Review workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

CopyProgress:
- [ ] Step 1: Parse GATHERED_INFO, TICKET_PATH, and CONFIG
- [ ] Step 2: Load project knowledge
- [ ] Step 3: Check criteria and detect violations
- [ ] Step 4: Score each finding (0-100)
- [ ] Step 5: Generate report

Step 1: Parse GATHERED_INFO, TICKET_PATH, and CONFIG

Parse from task prompt:

• GATHERED_INFO: UI test scenario content
• TICKET_PATH: target ticket folder path
• CONFIG: project configuration

Step 2: Load project knowledge

Run: python ~/.claude/scripts/resolve_knowledge.py --refs "${TICKET_PATH}/knowledge-refs.md" --workflow "/ui-test-design" --base "${CONFIG.BASE_PATH}"

• On success/partial: use knowledge[].content for context
• On failure: continue without knowledge

Step 3: Check criteria and detect violations

Read each scenario and judge whether expected text can be visually verified from actual UI. Context-based judgment required.

Step 4: Score each finding (0-100)

For each finding, assign confidence score based on evidence strength:

• 100: Absolutely certain, definitely real
• 75: Highly confident, real and important
• 50: Moderately confident, real but minor
• 25: Somewhat confident, might be real
• 0: Not confident, false positive

Step 5: Generate report

Output format:

Copy## UI Wording Review

Found X issues:

1. [Score: 95] Description

   scenario:line

2. [Score: 82] Description

   scenario:line