---

name: tech-debt-inventory description: Systematically catalog and prioritize technical debt across the codebase. Use during planning cycles, before major refactors, or when the codebase feels increasingly difficult to work with.

Tech Debt Inventory

Systematic identification, categorization, and prioritization of technical debt.

Debt Categories

1. Code Debt

• Functions exceeding 50 lines
• Files approaching 300 lines (per AGENTS.md)
• any types that need proper typing
• TODO/FIXME/HACK comments in code
• Commented-out code blocks
• Copy-pasted logic (DRY violations)
• Inconsistent patterns across similar features

2. Architecture Debt

• Tight coupling between modules
• Circular dependencies
• Misplaced responsibilities (wrong layer)
• Missing abstractions
• Over-engineered abstractions
• Inconsistent data flow patterns

3. Testing Debt

• Missing unit tests for utilities
• Missing integration tests for APIs
• No E2E coverage for critical paths
• Flaky tests that are skipped
• Test data that's hard to maintain

4. Documentation Debt

• Outdated README sections
• Missing API documentation
• Stale inline comments
• Undocumented environment variables
• Missing architectural decision records

5. Dependency Debt

• Outdated packages with security issues
• Deprecated APIs still in use
• Multiple libraries for same purpose
• Packages not tree-shaking properly

6. Infrastructure Debt

• Manual deployment steps
• Missing environment parity
• Hardcoded configuration
• Missing health checks
• Inadequate monitoring

7. Schema Debt

• Missing database indexes
• Denormalization without justification
• Inconsistent naming conventions
• Missing foreign key constraints
• Orphan data potential

8. UX Debt

• Inconsistent UI patterns
• Missing loading states
• Poor error messages
• Accessibility gaps
• Mobile responsiveness issues

Debt Scoring Matrix

Impact Scoring

• 5: Blocks feature development
• 4: Significantly slows every PR
• 3: Regularly causes confusion
• 2: Occasional friction
• 1: Minor annoyance

Risk Scoring

• 5: Security vulnerability or data loss potential
• 4: Could cause production outage
• 3: Could cause user-facing bugs
• 2: Internal tooling issues
• 1: Code aesthetics only

Output Format

Copy## Debt Item: [Short Title]

**ID**: DEBT-XXX
**Category**: Code|Architecture|Testing|Documentation|Dependency|Infrastructure|Schema|UX
**Location**: File path or module name
**Introduced**: Approximate date or PR if known

**Description**:
[What the debt is and why it exists]

**Impact**: X/5
[How it affects development velocity]

**Risk**: X/5
[What could go wrong]

**Effort**: S|M|L|XL
[Estimated fix effort]

**Priority Score**: X.X
[Calculated from matrix]

**Proposed Solution**:
[How to address this debt]

**Dependencies**:
[Other debt items or features this relates to]

---

Actions

1. Scan for TODO/FIXME/HACK comments
2. Identify files over 300 lines
3. Find any types in TypeScript
4. Check for outdated dependencies
5. Review missing test coverage
6. Audit documentation freshness
7. Check for inconsistent patterns

Inventory Process

1. Discover: Automated scans + team input
2. Categorize: Assign to debt category
3. Score: Apply scoring matrix
4. Prioritize: Rank by priority score
5. Plan: Allocate to sprints/quarters
6. Track: Update as debt is addressed

Integration with Development

Per AGENTS.md principles:

• Don't add new debt without documenting it
• Address debt opportunistically during related work
• Allocate ~20% of sprint capacity to debt reduction
• Celebrate debt payoff in retrospectives

Post-Inventory

Generate:

• Prioritized debt backlog
• Debt by category breakdown
• High-risk items requiring immediate attention
• Quick wins (high impact, low effort)
• Quarterly debt reduction plan
• Metrics for tracking debt over time