code-review

---

name: code-review description: Comprehensive code review combining PR review, self-review, and quality checks. Supports reviewing PRs by number or comparing branches. allowed-tools: TodoWrite, TodoRead, Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(git:), Bash(mkdir:), Bash(gh pr view:), Bash(gh pr diff:), mcp__serena__find_file, mcp__serena__find_symbol, mcp__serena__find_referencing_symbols, mcp__serena__get_symbols_overview, mcp__serena__search_for_pattern, mcp__serena__list_memories argument-hint: "pr | base-branch" user-invocable: true

Code Review Skill

Comprehensive code review skill that combines PR review, self-review, and quality checks.

Usage

Copy/code-review                # Self-review: current branch vs main
/code-review <branch>       # Self-review: current branch vs specified branch
/code-review pr <number>    # PR review: review the specified PR

The argument is available as $ARGUMENTS.

Argument Parsing

Copy$ARGUMENTS parsing:
- Empty → Self-review mode (base=main)
- "pr <number>" → PR review mode (use gh pr diff)
- Otherwise → Self-review mode (base=specified branch)

---

Review Process

IMPORTANT: Use Serena MCP extensively to analyze code efficiently while minimizing token consumption.

CRITICAL: Before starting any code review, you MUST read and understand the implementation guidelines:

• Read @~/.claude/templates/frontend-implementation-guidelines.md for frontend code reviews
• Read @~/.claude/templates/backend-implementation-guidelines.md for backend code reviews
• Apply the specific principles from these guidelines during your review

Step 1: Get Changes

For Self-Review (no args or branch name):

Copy# Get current branch name
git branch --show-current

# Determine base branch (use main if $ARGUMENTS is empty, otherwise use $ARGUMENTS)
BASE_BRANCH=${ARGUMENTS:-main}

# Get list of changed files
git diff $BASE_BRANCH...HEAD --name-status

# Get commit history
git log $BASE_BRANCH..HEAD --oneline

# Get detailed diff
git diff $BASE_BRANCH...HEAD

For PR Review (pr <number>):

Copy# Get PR information
gh pr view <number>

# Get PR diff
gh pr diff <number>

Step 2: Quality Check (All Files)

Perform quality checks on all changed files before detailed review:

Code Quality:

1. Detect unused code (variables, parameters, functions, classes)
2. Detect commented-out code blocks
3. Detect unreachable code branches

Comment Quality:

1. Detect progress/completion declarations ("implemented", "done", etc.)
2. Detect date or version references in comments

Detection Methods:

• Use mcp__serena__get_symbols_overview to get symbol list
• Use mcp__serena__find_referencing_symbols to check reference count (0 = unused candidate)
• Use Grep for pattern matching:
  • /\/\/.*?(実装済み|done|完了|implemented)/i
  • /\/\/.*?\d{4}[-\/]\d{1,2}[-\/]\d{1,2}/
  • Consecutive commented-out lines (3+ lines)

Step 3: Read Implementation Guidelines

Based on file extensions in the changes:

• .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx, .vue, .svelte → Read frontend guidelines
• .py, .go, .java, .rs, .cs → Read backend guidelines
• Both present → Read both guidelines

Step 4: Analyze Each Change

For each changed file:

1. Get symbol overview: Use mcp__serena__get_symbols_overview
2. Identify changed symbols: Use mcp__serena__find_symbol for details
3. Get original code: Use git show <base-branch>:path/to/file
4. Check impact: Use mcp__serena__find_referencing_symbols
5. Review related tests: Check test file changes

Step 5: Impact Analysis

Use find_referencing_symbols to investigate indirect impacts:

• Direct impact: List changed functions, APIs, screens
• Indirect impact: Identify callers/callees
• Breaking change risks: Type changes, return value changes, exception changes, state management changes, DB schema changes, cache changes

Step 6: Generate Review Report

Save the review results to .tmp/code-review-<branch-or-pr>.md

---

Output Format

Write the review in Japanese using the following format:

Copy# コードレビュー: <ブランチ名 または PR番号>

## 概要
[変更の目的と範囲の要約]

---

## Quality Check結果

### 未使用コードの検出
| ファイル | 行 | 種類 | 詳細 |
|----------|-----|------|------|
| path/to/file.ts | 42 | 未使用変数 | `unusedVar` |

### 不適切なコメントの検出
| ファイル | 行 | 内容 |
|----------|-----|------|
| path/to/file.ts | 15 | "実装済み" |

（問題なければ「問題なし」と記載）

---

## 修正1: [修正の概要タイトル]

### 背景・実装の意図
[修正が必要になった背景と、このアプローチを選んだ理由]

### ファイルと関数
- **ファイル**: `path/to/file.ts`
- **関数**: `functionName(args): returnType`

### 変更内容
```diff
- // 修正前
+ // 修正後

妥当性評価

テストの有無

懸念事項

• [懸念点があれば記載、なければ「なし」]

---

（修正ごとに繰り返し）

---

波及範囲分析

直接影響

• [変更された関数、API、画面のリスト]

間接影響

• [find_referencing_symbolsで検出した呼び出し元/先]

破壊的変更の可能性

• 型変更
• 戻り値変更
• 例外変更
• 状態管理変更
• DBスキーマ変更
• キャッシュ変更

不確実性（推測箇所）

• [調査が完全でない部分、推測に基づく発見]

---

落とし穴チェックリスト

セキュリティ

• 認可チェック
• 入力バリデーション
• ログ出力（機密情報漏洩なし）
• シークレット管理

パフォーマンス

• N+1クエリ
• メモリ使用量
• 同期I/O
• キャッシュ戦略

例外処理

• リトライロジック
• 外部I/Oタイムアウト

互換性

• 公開API
• イベント
• データベーススキーマ

---

追加すべきテストケース

必須

1. [追加必須のテスト]

推奨

1. [あると良いテスト]

エッジケース

1. [テストすべきエッジケース]

---

実装ガイドライン準拠性

Frontend（該当する場合）

Backend（該当する場合）

---

レビューコメント

良い点

• [他の開発者が学べる優れた設計・実装のみ記載]

改善点・確認点

• [具体的な改善提案]

---

変更ファイル一覧

---

結論

[全体的な評価と、マージ可否の判断材料]

Copy
---

## Review Guidelines

### Important Guidelines for Writing Comments

- **Inline Comment Structure:**
  - **Lead with conclusion:** Use a one-line summary of the main point
  - **Reasoning and suggestions:** After the conclusion, provide detailed explanation
  - **Focus on issues:** Focus on specific improvements like bug fixes, potential bugs, or readability issues

- **Regarding Positive Feedback:**
  - **Be selective:** Only mention exceptional design choices or innovative implementations
  - **Summarize positives:** Consolidate overall positive aspects in the summary section

### Review Perspectives

**[MANDATORY] Implementation Guidelines Compliance**

**For Frontend Code (`@~/.claude/templates/frontend-implementation-guidelines.md`):**
- **Principle 1**: Separation of Concerns Through Custom Hooks
- **Principle 2**: Comprehensive Error Handling with ErrorScreen components
- **Principle 3**: Loading State Management with LoadingScreen components
- **Principle 4**: Performance Optimization Through Memoization
- **Principle 5**: Type Safety with TypeScript
- **Principle 6**: Component Decomposition
- **Principle 7**: Declarative UI Design
- **Principle 8**: Centralized Data Management
- **Principle 9**: Externalization of Constants
- **Principle 10**: Avoiding Props Drilling

**For Backend Code (`@~/.claude/templates/backend-implementation-guidelines.md`):**
- **Principle 1**: Layered Architecture with Clear Boundaries
- **Principle 2**: Result-Based Error Handling and Logging
- **Principle 3**: Input Validation and Type Safety
- **Principle 4**: Dependency Injection for Testability
- **Principle 5**: Transaction Management
- **Principle 6**: Authentication and Authorization
- **Principle 7**: Consistent API Design
- **Principle 8**: Performance Optimization
- **Principle 9**: Security by Design
- **Principle 10**: Observable and Debuggable
- **Principle 11**: Reliability Engineering
- **Principle 12**: Scalability and Continuous Learning

### Evaluation Criteria

- **OK**: No issues, properly implemented
- **Needs Review**: Works correctly but needs confirmation or discussion
- **Problem**: Bug, security risk, or design problem

### Additional Notes

- Provide feedback in Japanese
- Give specific and actionable feedback
- Always explicitly state uncertainty - mark speculation clearly
- Use `mcp__serena__find_referencing_symbols` to assess breaking change risks

think super hard