← スキル一覧に戻る
planning
miethe / ai-scratchpad
⭐ 0🍴 0📅 2025年12月26日
Generate and optimize PRDs, Implementation Plans, and Progress Tracking documents optimized as AI artifacts for development agents. Use when creating new feature plans, breaking down long planning docs (>800 lines), or setting up progress tracking. Supports: 1) Create PRD from feature request, 2) Create Implementation Plan from PRD with phase breakdown and subagent assignments, 3) Optimize existing plans by breaking into phase-specific files, 4) Create progress tracking with task assignments. Example: "Create a PRD for user authentication feature" or "Break down the sidebar-polish implementation plan into phase files" or "Create progress tracking for data-layer-fixes PRD".
SKILL.md
---
name: planning
description: Generate and optimize PRDs, Implementation Plans, and Progress Tracking documents optimized as AI artifacts for development agents. Use when creating new feature plans, breaking down long planning docs (>800 lines), or setting up progress tracking. Supports: 1) Create PRD from feature request, 2) Create Implementation Plan from PRD with phase breakdown and subagent assignments, 3) Optimize existing plans by breaking into phase-specific files, 4) Create progress tracking with task assignments. Example: "Create a PRD for user authentication feature" or "Break down the sidebar-polish implementation plan into phase files" or "Create progress tracking for data-layer-fixes PRD".
---
# Planning Skill
## About This Skill
The Planning Skill generates and optimizes Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) and Implementation Plans as AI artifacts - file-based context caches optimized for AI agent consumption rather than human reading.
### Purpose
- Generate comprehensive PRDs from feature requests following MP template
- Create phased Implementation Plans with subagent task assignments
- Optimize existing planning docs by breaking into token-efficient files
- Set up progress tracking structures for multi-phase implementations
### Key Benefits
- **Token Efficiency**: Max ~800 lines per file for optimal AI context loading
- **Progressive Disclosure**: Summary → Detail pattern with linked files
- **Subagent Integration**: Automatic task assignment to appropriate specialists
- **MP Architecture Compliance**: Plans follow layered architecture (routers → services → repositories → DB)
- **Structured Tracking**: One progress file per phase following CLAUDE.md policy
### When to Use This Skill
- Creating PRDs for new features or enhancements
- Generating detailed implementation plans from PRDs
- Breaking down long planning documents (>800 lines) into manageable files
- Setting up progress tracking for multi-phase work
- Optimizing existing plans for better AI agent consumption
## Quick Start
### Create PRD from Feature Request
```bash
# User provides feature description
User: "Create a PRD for advanced filtering on the prompts page"
# Skill generates PRD at:
# docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/advanced-filtering-v1.md
```
### Create Implementation Plan from PRD
```bash
# Provide PRD path
User: "Create implementation plan for docs/project_plans/PRDs/harden-polish/advanced-filtering-v1.md"
# Skill generates:
# - Main plan: docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/advanced-filtering-v1.md
# - Phase files (if needed): docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/advanced-filtering-v1/phase-[N]-[name].md
```
### Optimize Existing Plan
```bash
# Provide existing plan path
User: "Optimize docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/sidebar-polish-v1.md"
# Skill:
# 1. Analyzes plan length (e.g., 1200 lines)
# 2. Breaks into phase-specific files (~400 lines each)
# 3. Updates parent plan with links to phase files
```
### Create Progress Tracking
```bash
# Provide PRD or Implementation Plan
User: "Create progress tracking for data-layer-fixes PRD"
# Skill generates:
# .claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md
# With task breakdown, subagent assignments, completion tracking
```
## Core Workflows
### Workflow 1: Create PRD from Feature Request
**Input**: Feature description or request from user
**Process**:
1. **Analyze Request**
- Extract feature name, scope, goals
- Identify related systems and components
- Determine priority and complexity
2. **Structure PRD**
- Use template: `./templates/prd-template.md`
- Follow MP architecture patterns (see `./references/mp-architecture.md`)
- Include frontmatter with proper metadata
- Organize into standard PRD sections
3. **Add Implementation Context**
- Break into phased approach
- Identify architectural layers involved
- Note dependencies and risks
- Define success criteria and acceptance tests
4. **Determine Location**
- Category: `docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/`
- Categories: `harden-polish`, `features`, `enhancements`, `refactors`
- Naming: `[feature-name]-v1.md` (kebab-case)
5. **Generate File**
- Write PRD to determined location
- Include YAML frontmatter with metadata
- Link to related docs (ADRs, guides, etc.)
- Add to project tracking if needed
**Output**:
- PRD file at: `docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/[feature-name]-v1.md`
- Follows template structure
- Ready for implementation planning
**Example**:
```markdown
Input: "Add real-time collaboration features to prompt editing"
Output Location: docs/project_plans/PRDs/features/realtime-collaboration-v1.md
Sections:
1. Executive Summary - Real-time collaborative editing
2. Context & Background - Current single-user editing limitations
3. Problem Statement - Users can't collaborate on prompts
4. Goals & Success Metrics - Multiple concurrent editors, conflict resolution
5. Requirements - WebSocket connections, operational transforms, presence indicators
6. Implementation Phases - Phase 1: Backend infrastructure, Phase 2: Frontend integration
... (full PRD structure)
```
### Workflow 2: Create Implementation Plan from PRD
**Input**: Path to existing PRD or newly created PRD
**Process**:
1. **Analyze PRD**
- Read full PRD content
- Extract key requirements
- Identify architectural layers needed
- Determine phase breakdown strategy
2. **Plan Phase Structure**
- Follow MP layered architecture: routers → services → repositories → DB
- Group related tasks into phases
- Common phases: Database → Repository → Service → API → UI → Testing → Docs → Deployment
- Consider parallel work opportunities
- Identify critical path
3. **Generate Task Breakdown**
- Use template: `./templates/implementation-plan-template.md`
- Create tasks for each phase
- Format: Task tables with ID, Name, Description, Acceptance Criteria, Estimate
- Include quality gates for each phase
4. **Assign Subagents**
- Use reference: `./references/subagent-assignments.md`
- Assign based on task type:
- Database: `data-layer-expert`
- Backend API: `python-backend-engineer`, `backend-architect`
- Frontend: `ui-engineer-enhanced`, `frontend-developer`
- UI Components: `ui-designer`, `ui-engineer`
- Testing: appropriate testing agents
- Docs: `documentation-writer`, `documentation-complex`
- Add to each task: "Assigned Subagent(s): agent-1, agent-2"
5. **Optimize for Token Efficiency**
- If total plan >800 lines: break into phase-specific files
- Pattern: `[feature-name]-v1/phase-[N]-[name].md`
- Parent plan links to phase files
- Each phase file <800 lines
- See `./references/optimization-patterns.md`
6. **Generate Files**
- Main plan: `docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/[category]/[feature-name]-v1.md`
- Phase files (if needed): `docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/[category]/[feature-name]-v1/phase-[N]-[name].md`
- Link phase files from parent plan
**Output**:
- Implementation Plan at determined location
- Phase breakdown with subagent assignments
- Linked phase files if plan >800 lines
- Quality gates and success criteria per phase
**Example**:
```markdown
Input PRD: docs/project_plans/PRDs/features/realtime-collaboration-v1.md
Output:
Main Plan: docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/features/realtime-collaboration-v1.md
Phase Breakdown:
- Phase 1: Database Layer (websocket_sessions, edit_locks tables) - data-layer-expert
- Phase 2: Repository Layer (session management, lock management) - python-backend-engineer
- Phase 3: Service Layer (operational transforms, conflict resolution) - backend-architect
- Phase 4: API Layer (WebSocket endpoints, presence API) - python-backend-engineer
- Phase 5: UI Layer (collaborative editor, presence indicators) - ui-engineer-enhanced, frontend-developer
- Phase 6: Testing (unit, integration, E2E conflict scenarios) - testing agents
- Phase 7: Documentation (API docs, user guides) - documentation-writer
- Phase 8: Deployment (feature flags, monitoring) - DevOps
Phase Files (if plan >800 lines):
- realtime-collaboration-v1/phase-1-database.md
- realtime-collaboration-v1/phase-2-repository.md
- realtime-collaboration-v1/phase-3-5-backend.md (grouped related phases)
- realtime-collaboration-v1/phase-6-8-validation.md (grouped related phases)
```
### Workflow 3: Optimize Existing Plans
**Input**: Path to existing PRD or Implementation Plan that's >800 lines
**Process**:
1. **Analyze Plan**
- Read full plan
- Count total lines
- Identify natural break points (phases, sections)
- Determine optimal split strategy
2. **Determine Breakout Strategy**
- Primary: Break by phase (most common)
- Secondary: Break by domain (backend vs frontend)
- Tertiary: Break by task type (implementation vs testing)
- Goal: Each file <800 lines, logically cohesive
3. **Create Breakout Files**
- Pattern: `[plan-name]/phase-[N]-[name].md`
- Alternative: `[plan-name]/[domain]-tasks.md`
- Each file includes:
- Phase/section overview
- Relevant tasks with subagent assignments
- Quality gates for that section
- Links back to parent plan
4. **Update Parent Plan**
- Add table of contents linking to breakout files
- Keep executive summary and overview in parent
- Replace detailed sections with links:
```markdown
## Phase 2: Repository Layer
See [Phase 2 Implementation Details](./[plan-name]/phase-2-repository.md)
```
- Maintain quality gates summary in parent
5. **Validate Optimization**
- Each file <800 lines ✓
- All content preserved ✓
- Links work correctly ✓
- Logical grouping maintained ✓
- Progressive disclosure achieved ✓
**Output**:
- Optimized parent plan (summary + links)
- Breakout files for detailed content
- Improved token efficiency (95%+ reduction in single-load context)
**Example**:
```markdown
Input: docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/sidebar-polish-v1.md (1200 lines)
Analysis:
- 8 phases, ~150 lines each
- Can group related phases: 1-3 (backend), 4-5 (frontend), 6-8 (validation)
Output:
Parent: sidebar-polish-v1.md (200 lines - summary + links)
Phase Files:
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-1-3-backend.md (450 lines)
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-4-5-frontend.md (400 lines)
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-6-8-validation.md (350 lines)
Token Efficiency:
- Before: Load 1200 lines for any query
- After: Load 200-line summary, then specific phase (450 max) = 67% reduction
```
### Workflow 4: Create Progress Tracking
**Input**: PRD or Implementation Plan
**Process**:
1. **Extract Implementation Tasks**
- Read Implementation Plan (or "Implementation" section of PRD)
- Extract all tasks by phase
- Capture task IDs, names, descriptions, estimates
2. **Structure Progress File**
- Use template: `./templates/progress-tracking-template.md`
- Follow CLAUDE.md policy: ONE file per feature (all phases)
- Location: `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
- Format: Phase overview table + detailed phase sections
3. **Add Subagent Assignments**
- Use `./references/subagent-assignments.md`
- Add to each task based on type
- Format: "Assigned Subagent(s): agent-1, agent-2"
- Example task types:
- Database schema: data-layer-expert
- API endpoints: python-backend-engineer, backend-architect
- React components: ui-engineer-enhanced, frontend-developer
- Testing: testing specialists
- Documentation: documentation-writer
4. **Set Up Tracking Structure**
- Phase Overview table with status/completion
- Per-phase sections with:
- Completion checklist (tasks as checkboxes)
- Subagent assignments
- Success criteria
- Key files involved
- Status tracking: NOT STARTED, IN PROGRESS, BLOCKED, COMPLETE
5. **Link from PRD**
- Update PRD's "Implementation" section
- Add link to progress tracking file
- Format: `See progress tracking: .claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
**Output**:
- Progress tracking file at: `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
- Linked from PRD
- Tasks organized by phase
- Subagent assignments on every task
- Ready for implementation tracking
**Example**:
```markdown
Input PRD: docs/project_plans/PRDs/harden-polish/data-layer-fixes-filtering-v1.md
Output: .claude/progress/data-layer-fixes-filtering-v1/all-phases-progress.md
Structure:
# All-Phases Progress: Data Layer Fixes & Filtering
**Status**: NOT STARTED
**Last Updated**: 2025-11-11
**Completion**: 0% (0 of 24 story points)
## Phase Overview
| Phase | Title | Effort | Status | Completion |
|-------|-------|--------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | Repository Layer - Transaction Mgmt | 8 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
| 2 | Repository Layer - Filter Queries | 8 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
| 3 | Service Layer - Validation & DTOs | 5 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
| 4 | Frontend Layer - React Query | 5 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
## Phase 1: Repository Layer - Transaction Management
**Assigned Subagent(s)**: data-layer-expert, python-backend-engineer
### Completion Checklist
- [ ] TX-001: Fix BaseRepository Rollback (3 pts)
Assigned Subagent(s): data-layer-expert
- [ ] TX-002: Update PromptRepository Error Handling (3 pts)
Assigned Subagent(s): python-backend-engineer
- [ ] TX-003: Add Transaction Telemetry (1 pt)
Assigned Subagent(s): backend-architect
- [ ] TX-004: Integration Tests (1 pt)
Assigned Subagent(s): testing-specialist
### Success Criteria
- [ ] All repository exceptions trigger automatic rollback
- [ ] Transaction state correctly reset after errors
...
```
## Templates Reference
### prd-template.md
**Location**: `./templates/prd-template.md`
**Based On**: `/docs/docs-v2/templates/PRD-TEMPLATE.md`
**Purpose**: Standard PRD structure for MeatyPrompts features
**Key Sections**:
- Feature Brief & Metadata (name, date, author, related docs)
- Executive Summary (1-2 paragraphs)
- Context & Background (problem space, current state)
- Problem Statement (clear gap or pain point)
- Goals & Success Metrics (measurable outcomes)
- Requirements (functional and non-functional)
- Scope (in-scope vs out-of-scope)
- Dependencies & Assumptions
- Risks & Mitigations
- Target State (post-implementation)
- Acceptance Criteria (definition of done)
- Implementation (phased breakdown with tasks)
**When to Use**: Creating any new PRD
### implementation-plan-template.md
**Location**: `./templates/implementation-plan-template.md`
**Based On**: `/claude-export/templates/pm/implementation-plan-template.md`
**Purpose**: Detailed phased implementation with task breakdown
**Key Sections**:
- Executive Summary (approach, milestones, success criteria)
- Implementation Strategy (architecture sequence, parallel work, critical path)
- Phase Breakdown (8 standard phases with task tables)
- Risk Mitigation (technical and schedule risks)
- Resource Requirements (team composition, skills, infrastructure)
- Success Metrics (delivery, business, technical)
- Communication Plan (status reporting, escalation)
- Post-Implementation Plan (monitoring, maintenance)
**When to Use**: Creating implementation plan from PRD
### progress-tracking-template.md
**Location**: `./templates/progress-tracking-template.md`
**Purpose**: Track implementation progress across all phases
**Key Sections**:
- Status header (overall status, completion %, last updated)
- Phase Overview table (phase, title, effort, status, completion)
- Per-phase sections (completion checklist, success criteria, key files)
- Subagent assignments per task
- Links to PRD and Implementation Plan
**When to Use**: Setting up progress tracking for multi-phase work
### phase-breakdown-template.md
**Location**: `./templates/phase-breakdown-template.md`
**Purpose**: Template for individual phase files when breaking up long plans
**Key Sections**:
- Phase overview (duration, dependencies, team)
- Task breakdown table (ID, name, description, acceptance criteria, estimate, assignee)
- Subagent assignments
- Quality gates
- Key files and integration points
- Link back to parent plan
**When to Use**: Breaking long implementation plans into phase-specific files
## Scripts Reference
All scripts are in `./scripts/` directory and use Node.js (NOT Python).
### generate-prd.sh
**Purpose**: Generate PRD from feature request
**Usage**:
```bash
./scripts/generate-prd.sh "Feature description" "category"
```
**Process**:
1. Parse feature description
2. Determine category and filename
3. Load PRD template
4. Generate PRD content
5. Write to `docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/[feature-name]-v1.md`
**Output**: PRD file path
### generate-impl-plan.sh
**Purpose**: Generate implementation plan from PRD
**Usage**:
```bash
./scripts/generate-impl-plan.sh "path/to/prd.md"
```
**Process**:
1. Read PRD content
2. Extract requirements and phases
3. Generate task breakdown
4. Add subagent assignments
5. Determine if plan needs breakout (>800 lines)
6. Write main plan and phase files
**Output**: Implementation plan file path(s)
### optimize-plan.sh
**Purpose**: Break long plan into phase-specific files
**Usage**:
```bash
./scripts/optimize-plan.sh "path/to/plan.md"
```
**Process**:
1. Read plan and count lines
2. Determine optimal breakout strategy
3. Create phase-specific files
4. Update parent plan with links
5. Validate all content preserved
**Output**: List of created phase files
### assign-subagents.sh
**Purpose**: Add subagent assignments to tasks in plan
**Usage**:
```bash
./scripts/assign-subagents.sh "path/to/plan.md"
```
**Process**:
1. Read plan and extract tasks
2. Determine task type (database, API, frontend, etc.)
3. Map to appropriate subagents using `./references/subagent-assignments.md`
4. Add assignment note to each task
5. Update plan file
**Output**: Updated plan with subagent assignments
### create-progress-tracking.sh
**Purpose**: Create progress tracking document from plan
**Usage**:
```bash
./scripts/create-progress-tracking.sh "path/to/plan.md"
```
**Process**:
1. Read implementation plan
2. Extract all phases and tasks
3. Generate progress tracking structure
4. Add subagent assignments
5. Write to `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
6. Update PRD with link to progress file
**Output**: Progress tracking file path
## References
### mp-architecture.md
**Location**: `./references/mp-architecture.md`
**Purpose**: Summary of MeatyPrompts layered architecture
**Content**:
- Layered architecture: routers → services → repositories → DB
- Repositories own all DB I/O and RLS
- Services return DTOs only
- Routers handle HTTP + validation
- ErrorResponse envelope for errors
- Cursor pagination for lists: `{ items, pageInfo }`
- OpenTelemetry spans and structured logging
**Used By**: PRD generation, implementation planning
### subagent-assignments.md
**Location**: `./references/subagent-assignments.md`
**Purpose**: Mapping of task types to appropriate subagents
**Content**:
| Task Type | Subagents | Notes |
|-----------|-----------|-------|
| Database Schema | data-layer-expert | Tables, indexes, RLS policies |
| Database Migrations | data-layer-expert, python-backend-engineer | Alembic migrations |
| Repository Layer | python-backend-engineer, data-layer-expert | DB I/O, transactions |
| Service Layer | python-backend-engineer, backend-architect | Business logic, DTOs |
| API Endpoints | python-backend-engineer, backend-architect | FastAPI routers |
| Frontend Components | ui-engineer-enhanced, frontend-developer | React components |
| UI Design | ui-designer, ux-researcher | Design system, wireframes |
| Testing | testing specialists | Unit, integration, E2E |
| Documentation | documentation-writer, documentation-complex | Based on complexity |
| Performance | react-performance-optimizer | React optimization |
| Accessibility | web-accessibility-checker | WCAG compliance |
**Used By**: Implementation planning, progress tracking creation
### file-structure.md
**Location**: `./references/file-structure.md`
**Purpose**: Directory structure conventions for plans and progress
**Content**:
```
docs/project_plans/
├── PRDs/
│ ├── harden-polish/ # Bug fixes, polish
│ ├── features/ # New features
│ ├── enhancements/ # Feature enhancements
│ └── refactors/ # Architecture refactors
│
└── implementation_plans/
├── harden-polish/
│ ├── feature-name-v1.md # Main plan
│ └── feature-name-v1/ # Phase breakouts
│ ├── phase-1-database.md
│ ├── phase-2-3-backend.md
│ └── phase-4-5-frontend.md
├── features/
├── enhancements/
└── refactors/
.claude/
└── progress/
└── feature-name/
└── all-phases-progress.md # ONE file per feature
```
**Naming Conventions**:
- PRDs: `[feature-name]-v1.md` (kebab-case)
- Implementation Plans: `[feature-name]-v1.md`
- Phase Files: `phase-[N]-[name].md` or `phase-[N]-[M]-[name].md` (grouped)
- Progress: `all-phases-progress.md` (one per feature)
**Used By**: File creation, optimization
### optimization-patterns.md
**Location**: `./references/optimization-patterns.md`
**Purpose**: Patterns for breaking up long files into token-efficient chunks
**Content**:
**Pattern 1: Break by Phase** (Most Common)
- Split implementation plan by phase (1-3, 4-5, 6-8)
- Each phase file <800 lines
- Parent links to phase files
- Progressive disclosure: Load summary, then specific phase
**Pattern 2: Break by Domain**
- Backend phases (Database, Repository, Service, API)
- Frontend phases (UI, Components, State)
- Validation phases (Testing, Docs, Deployment)
**Pattern 3: Break by Task Type**
- Implementation tasks
- Testing tasks
- Documentation tasks
- Deployment tasks
**Pattern 4: Keep Together**
- Always keep in parent plan:
- Executive summary
- Phase overview table
- Risk mitigation summary
- Success metrics overview
- Move to phase files:
- Detailed task breakdowns
- Specific acceptance criteria
- Technical implementation notes
**Token Efficiency Gains**:
- Before: Load entire 1200-line plan
- After: Load 200-line summary + 400-line phase = 50% reduction
- For targeted queries: Load only relevant phase = 67%+ reduction
**Used By**: Plan optimization workflow
## Best Practices
### File Size Management
**Guideline**: No file should exceed ~800 lines
**Rationale**:
- Optimal token efficiency for AI context loading
- Enables progressive disclosure pattern
- Reduces cognitive load for agents
- Faster file parsing and analysis
**Strategies**:
1. Break plans by phase when >800 lines
2. Group short related phases (1-3, 4-5)
3. Keep summaries in parent, details in phase files
4. Use links for cross-references
### Naming Conventions
**PRDs**: `[feature-name]-v1.md`
- Use kebab-case (lowercase with hyphens)
- Include version number (-v1, -v2)
- Descriptive name (e.g., `advanced-filtering-v1.md`)
**Implementation Plans**: `[feature-name]-v1.md`
- Match PRD naming
- Same category as PRD
- Version synchronized with PRD
**Phase Files**: `phase-[N]-[name].md`
- Sequential numbering (phase-1, phase-2)
- Can group: `phase-1-3-backend.md`
- Descriptive name (database, repository, frontend)
**Progress Files**: `all-phases-progress.md`
- ONE file per feature (all phases together)
- Location: `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/`
### Directory Organization
**PRDs**:
- `docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/`
- Categories: `harden-polish`, `features`, `enhancements`, `refactors`
**Implementation Plans**:
- `docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/[category]/`
- Match PRD category
- Phase breakouts in subdirectory: `[plan-name]/`
**Progress Tracking**:
- `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/`
- One directory per feature
- Contains: `all-phases-progress.md`
### Subagent Assignment Strategy
**Match Task Type to Specialist**:
- Database work → data-layer-expert
- API implementation → python-backend-engineer, backend-architect
- React components → ui-engineer-enhanced, frontend-developer
- UI design → ui-designer, ux-researcher
- Testing → appropriate testing specialists
- Documentation → documentation-writer (90%), documentation-complex (10%)
**Assignment Format**:
```markdown
- [ ] TASK-001: Task Name (3 pts)
Assigned Subagent(s): python-backend-engineer, backend-architect
```
**Multiple Agents**:
- Primary agent first
- Supporting agents after
- Consider expertise overlap
### Token Efficiency Tips
**Progressive Disclosure**:
1. Summary in parent plan (200 lines)
2. Link to detailed phase files (400 lines each)
3. Agent loads summary first, then specific phase as needed
4. 50-67% token reduction
**Structured References**:
- Link to ADRs instead of duplicating architecture info
- Reference existing docs rather than repeating
- Use relative paths for phase file links
**Chunk by Logical Units**:
- Keep related tasks together
- Don't split mid-phase
- Group short phases if logical
- Maintain quality gates with phases
### YAML Frontmatter
**PRDs**:
```yaml
---
title: "Feature Name - PRD"
description: "Brief summary (1-2 sentences)"
audience: [ai-agents, developers]
tags: [relevant, tags, for, search]
created: 2025-11-11
updated: 2025-11-11
category: "product-planning"
status: draft|published
related:
- /docs/architecture/ADRs/relevant-adr.md
- /docs/guides/relevant-guide.md
---
```
**Implementation Plans**:
```yaml
---
title: "Feature Name - Implementation Plan"
description: "Brief summary of implementation approach"
audience: [ai-agents, developers]
tags: [implementation, planning, phases]
created: 2025-11-11
updated: 2025-11-11
category: "product-planning"
status: draft|in-progress|published
related:
- /docs/project_plans/PRDs/category/feature-name-v1.md
---
```
**Progress Tracking**:
No frontmatter required for `.claude/progress/` files (per CLAUDE.md)
## Examples
### Example 1: Create PRD for Advanced Filtering
**Input**:
```
User: "Create a PRD for adding advanced filtering to the prompts page. Users need to filter by multiple criteria: model, provider, date range, tags, and favorites."
```
**Process**:
1. Extract feature name: "Advanced Filtering"
2. Determine category: "features"
3. Generate PRD using template
4. Structure sections:
- Problem: Users can only filter by single criteria
- Goals: Multi-criteria filtering, saved filter sets
- Requirements: UI for filter builder, backend filter query support
- Phases: Phase 1 (Backend), Phase 2 (Frontend), Phase 3 (Saved Filters)
**Output**:
```
File: docs/project_plans/PRDs/features/advanced-filtering-v1.md
# Advanced Filtering - PRD
**Feature Name**: Advanced Filtering
**Date**: 2025-11-11
**Author**: Claude (Sonnet 4.5)
**Related**: Filtering guides, search ADRs
## 1. Executive Summary
Enable users to filter prompts by multiple criteria simultaneously (model, provider, date range, tags, favorites) with the ability to save and reuse filter sets.
## 2. Context & Background
Current filtering supports single criteria only. Users frequently need to filter by combinations (e.g., "OpenAI models from last week tagged 'production'").
... (full PRD structure)
```
### Example 2: Create Implementation Plan with Phase Breakout
**Input**:
```
User: "Create implementation plan for docs/project_plans/PRDs/features/advanced-filtering-v1.md"
```
**Process**:
1. Read PRD, extract requirements
2. Plan 7 phases following MP architecture
3. Generate task breakdown with estimates
4. Assign subagents to each task
5. Calculate total: 1100 lines → needs breakout
6. Create phase files:
- phase-1-3-backend.md (500 lines)
- phase-4-5-frontend.md (400 lines)
- phase-6-7-validation.md (300 lines)
7. Update parent plan with links (200 lines)
**Output**:
```
Main Plan: docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/features/advanced-filtering-v1.md (200 lines)
# Implementation Plan: Advanced Filtering
## Phase Overview
| Phase | Title | Effort | Files |
|-------|-------|--------|-------|
| 1-3 | Backend Implementation | 18 pts | [Details](./advanced-filtering-v1/phase-1-3-backend.md) |
| 4-5 | Frontend Implementation | 12 pts | [Details](./advanced-filtering-v1/phase-4-5-frontend.md) |
| 6-7 | Validation & Deployment | 8 pts | [Details](./advanced-filtering-v1/phase-6-7-validation.md) |
... (executive summary, strategy)
---
Phase Files Created:
- advanced-filtering-v1/phase-1-3-backend.md (500 lines)
- Phase 1: Database (filter_sets table, indexes)
- Phase 2: Repository (query builder, filter sets repo)
- Phase 3: Service (filter validation, DTO mapping)
- advanced-filtering-v1/phase-4-5-frontend.md (400 lines)
- Phase 4: API (filter endpoints, saved sets API)
- Phase 5: UI (filter builder component, saved sets UI)
- advanced-filtering-v1/phase-6-7-validation.md (300 lines)
- Phase 6: Testing (unit, integration, E2E)
- Phase 7: Deployment (feature flags, monitoring)
```
### Example 3: Optimize Existing Long Plan
**Input**:
```
User: "Optimize docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/sidebar-polish-v1.md - it's 1200 lines"
```
**Process**:
1. Read plan: 8 phases, ~150 lines each
2. Determine breakout: Group 1-3 (backend), 4-5 (frontend), 6-8 (validation)
3. Create phase files:
- phase-1-3-backend.md (450 lines)
- phase-4-5-frontend.md (400 lines)
- phase-6-8-validation.md (350 lines)
4. Update parent plan: Keep summary, add links to phase files (200 lines)
**Output**:
```
Updated: docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/harden-polish/sidebar-polish-v1.md (200 lines)
Created Phase Files:
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-1-3-backend.md (450 lines)
Phase 1: Database - Sidebar state, user preferences
Phase 2: Repository - State management, RLS
Phase 3: Service - Preference sync, DTOs
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-4-5-frontend.md (400 lines)
Phase 4: API - Endpoints for sidebar state
Phase 5: UI - Sidebar component, animations
- sidebar-polish-v1/phase-6-8-validation.md (350 lines)
Phase 6: Testing - Unit, integration, visual
Phase 7: Documentation - Component docs, API docs
Phase 8: Deployment - Feature flags, rollout
Token Efficiency: 67% reduction for targeted queries
```
### Example 4: Create Progress Tracking
**Input**:
```
User: "Create progress tracking for data-layer-fixes-filtering PRD"
```
**Process**:
1. Read PRD: docs/project_plans/PRDs/harden-polish/data-layer-fixes-filtering-v1.md
2. Extract "Implementation" section tasks
3. Organize by 5 phases
4. Assign subagents:
- Phase 1 (Transaction Mgmt): data-layer-expert, python-backend-engineer
- Phase 2 (Filter Queries): python-backend-engineer
- Phase 3 (Service Layer): backend-architect, python-backend-engineer
- Phase 4 (Frontend): ui-engineer-enhanced, frontend-developer
- Phase 5 (Testing): testing specialists
5. Create progress file with checkboxes and success criteria
6. Update PRD with link to progress file
**Output**:
```
Created: .claude/progress/data-layer-fixes-filtering-v1/all-phases-progress.md
Updated PRD Section:
## Implementation
See progress tracking: `.claude/progress/data-layer-fixes-filtering-v1/all-phases-progress.md`
Progress File Structure:
# All-Phases Progress: Data Layer Fixes & Filtering
**Status**: NOT STARTED
**Last Updated**: 2025-11-11
**Completion**: 0% (0 of 24 story points)
## Phase Overview
| Phase | Title | Effort | Status | Completion |
| 1 | Repository - Transaction Mgmt | 8 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
| 2 | Repository - Filter Queries | 8 pts | NOT STARTED | 0% |
...
## Phase 1: Repository Layer - Transaction Management
**Assigned Subagent(s)**: data-layer-expert, python-backend-engineer
### Completion Checklist
- [ ] TX-001: Fix BaseRepository Rollback (3 pts)
Assigned Subagent(s): data-layer-expert
- [ ] TX-002: Update PromptRepository Error Handling (3 pts)
Assigned Subagent(s): python-backend-engineer
...
### Success Criteria
- [ ] All repository exceptions trigger automatic rollback
- [ ] Transaction state correctly reset after errors
...
```
## Integration with MeatyPrompts
### Architecture Compliance
All plans follow MP layered architecture:
- **Routers** → Services → Repositories → DB
- Services return **DTOs only**
- Repositories own **all DB I/O and RLS**
- **Cursor pagination** for lists: `{ items, pageInfo }`
- **ErrorResponse** envelope for errors
- **OpenTelemetry** spans and structured logging
### Subagent Ecosystem
Plans integrate with 50+ MeatyPrompts subagents:
**Architecture**: lead-architect, backend-architect, data-layer-expert
**Development**: python-backend-engineer, frontend-developer, ui-engineer-enhanced
**UI/UX**: ui-designer, ux-researcher
**Review**: code-reviewer, task-completion-validator
**Documentation**: documentation-writer, documentation-complex
**Testing**: testing specialists
**Performance**: react-performance-optimizer, web-accessibility-checker
### Documentation Policy
Follows CLAUDE.md documentation policy:
- PRDs are product-planning docs (allowed)
- Implementation Plans are product-planning docs (allowed)
- Progress Tracking follows structured format (.claude/progress/)
- One progress file per feature (all phases)
- Frontmatter required for `/docs/`, not for `.claude/`
### File Organization
**PRDs**: `/docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/[feature-name]-v1.md`
**Plans**: `/docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/[category]/[feature-name]-v1.md`
**Progress**: `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
**Phase Files**: `[plan-name]/phase-[N]-[name].md`
## Advanced Usage
### Customizing Templates
Edit templates in `./templates/` to match project needs:
1. **PRD Template Customization**:
- Add project-specific sections
- Adjust success metrics format
- Include standard acceptance criteria
2. **Implementation Plan Template Customization**:
- Add/remove phases
- Adjust quality gates
- Customize risk categories
3. **Progress Tracking Template Customization**:
- Add project-specific status values
- Adjust completion tracking format
- Include team-specific metadata
### Multi-PRD Planning
For complex initiatives spanning multiple PRDs:
1. Create parent epic document
2. Generate individual PRDs for each component
3. Link PRDs to parent epic
4. Create unified progress tracking across PRDs
### Spike Integration
For research-heavy features:
1. Create SPIKE document first (using spike-writer agent)
2. Use SPIKE to inform PRD generation
3. Reference SPIKE in PRD "Context & Background"
4. Link SPIKE from Implementation Plan
### Continuous Optimization
Regularly optimize plans as work progresses:
1. Update progress tracking with actual completion
2. Adjust estimates based on learnings
3. Break out new sections if plan grows >800 lines
4. Archive completed phases
## Troubleshooting
### PRD Generation Issues
**Problem**: PRD missing key sections
**Solution**:
- Check template is complete: `./templates/prd-template.md`
- Verify feature description is detailed enough
- Review example PRDs: `/docs/project_plans/PRDs/`
### Implementation Plan Too Long
**Problem**: Generated plan exceeds 800 lines
**Solution**:
- Automatically triggers phase breakout
- Creates phase-specific files
- Updates parent with links
- If still too long: Group fewer phases per file
### Subagent Assignment Unclear
**Problem**: Not sure which subagent to assign to task
**Solution**:
- Check `./references/subagent-assignments.md`
- Look for similar tasks in existing progress files
- Default patterns:
- Database → data-layer-expert
- Backend → python-backend-engineer
- Frontend → ui-engineer-enhanced
- Docs → documentation-writer
### File Organization Confusion
**Problem**: Not sure where to place generated files
**Solution**:
- Check `./references/file-structure.md`
- PRDs: `/docs/project_plans/PRDs/[category]/`
- Plans: `/docs/project_plans/implementation_plans/[category]/`
- Progress: `.claude/progress/[feature-name]/`
- Phase files: Subdirectory of plan: `[plan-name]/`
### Progress Tracking Not Updating
**Problem**: Progress file created but not linked from PRD
**Solution**:
- Manually add link to PRD's "Implementation" section
- Format: `See progress tracking: .claude/progress/[feature-name]/all-phases-progress.md`
- Ensure progress file exists at expected location
## Related Skills
- **skill-builder**: Create new custom skills
- **symbols**: Token-efficient codebase indexing
- **codebase-explorer**: Fast pattern discovery
- **explore**: Deep codebase analysis
## Related Agents
- **lead-pm**: SDLC orchestration
- **prd-writer**: PRD creation
- **implementation-planner**: Detailed implementation planning
- **task-decomposition-expert**: Task breakdown
- **lead-architect**: Architecture planning assistance
- **documentation-writer**: Documentation for plans
## Version History
- **2025-11-11**: Initial skill creation
- 4 core workflows (PRD, Plan, Optimize, Progress)
- 4 templates (PRD, Plan, Progress, Phase)
- 5 scripts (generate-prd, generate-impl-plan, optimize-plan, assign-subagents, create-progress-tracking)
- 4 references (architecture, subagents, file-structure, optimization-patterns)