---

name: tdd-strict description: Test-Driven Development (Strict) skill for the ikigai project

Test-Driven Development (Strict)

Description

Strict TDD methodology for coverage phase. 90% coverage is non-negotiable.

Details

ABSOLUTE RULE: NEVER WRITE CODE BEFORE YOU HAVE A TEST THAT NEEDS IT

Follow strict Red/Green/Verify cycle:

1. Red: Write a failing test first

• Write the test code that calls the new function
• Add function declaration to header file
• Add stub implementation that compiles but does nothing (e.g., return OK(NULL);)
• IMPORTANT: A compilation error is NOT a failing test - you need a stub that compiles and runs
• Verify the test actually fails with assertion failures (e.g., wrong output)
• NO CODE exists until a test demands it

2. Green: Write minimal code to make the test pass

• Implement ONLY what the test requires
• STOP immediately when the test passes
• DO NOT write "helper functions" before they're called
• DO NOT write code "because you'll need it later"
• DO NOT refactor for complexity until make lint actually fails

3. Verify: Run quality checks

• make check - All tests must pass
• make lint - Code complexity under threshold
• make check-coverage - 90% coverage is MANDATORY

Coverage Phase Requirements

Hunt every branch. During coverage phase:

• Test all error paths (use mocks to trigger failures)
• Test assertion violations (tcase_add_test_raise_signal with SIGABRT)
• Test edge cases (empty, null, boundary conditions)
• Only use LCOV_EXCL markers when genuinely untestable (OOM, impossible states)

WARNING: Writing code before tests wastes tokens, time, and money by:

• Generating premature code
• Debugging unnecessary coverage gaps
• Reverting unused code
• Violating the core methodology

The test MUST come first. No exceptions.

If writing a helper function, ask: "Does a passing test call this right now?" If no, DELETE IT.

If a branch is uncovered, ask: "Can I write a test for this?" If yes, WRITE IT.