---

name: reflect description: Reflect on a session to identify learnings, friction points, and improvements. Captures valuable insights for future sessions and system evolution.

Session Reflection

Structured reflection using the @session-reflect workflow.

Quick Start

Copy# Start the reflection workflow
kspec workflow start @session-reflect

# Advance through steps (workflow will guide you)
kspec workflow next --notes "your notes..."

Workflow Overview

The reflection workflow has 6 steps:

1. What Worked Well - Identify effective practices
2. Friction Points - Where things were harder than needed
3. Check Coverage - Search specs/tasks/inbox for existing tracking
4. Propose Improvements - Concrete ideas for untracked friction
5. Discussion - Present to user, get approval one at a time
6. Capture - Add approved items to inbox/observations

Use kspec workflow show to see current progress.

Step Details

Step 1: What Worked Well

Identify practices that were effective:

• Workflows that flowed smoothly
• Tools/commands that helped
• Communication patterns that kept alignment
• Decisions that proved correct

Be specific - "categorizing items first" not "good planning"

Step 2: Friction Points

Identify where things were harder than needed:

• Repetitive manual steps
• Missing commands or options
• Context loss or re-explanation
• Workarounds used

Focus on systemic issues, not one-off mistakes

Step 3: Check Existing Coverage

Before proposing improvements, search ALL sources:

Copykspec search "<keyword>"  # Searches specs, tasks, AND inbox

For each friction point, note if it's:

• Already tracked - reference the existing item/task
• Partially covered - note what's missing
• Not tracked - candidate for capture

Exit criteria: Must have searched specs, tasks, and inbox.

Step 4: Propose Improvements

For untracked friction, propose concrete improvements:

• What it would do
• How it would help
• Rough scope (small/medium/large)

Step 5: Discussion

Present findings to user. Ask one at a time about each improvement:

• Is this worth capturing?
• Any refinements to the idea?
• Related ideas from user perspective?

Step 6: Capture

Use appropriate destination:

Copy# Actionable improvements (future work)
kspec inbox add "Description" --tag reflection --tag <area>

# Friction patterns (systemic issues)
kspec meta observe friction "Description"

# Success patterns (worth replicating)
kspec meta observe success "Description"

# Open questions
kspec meta question add "Question?"

Where to Capture What

Reflection Prompts

Use these during steps 1-2:

Process: What pattern did I repeat 3+ times? What workarounds did I use? Tools: What command/flag did I wish existed? Communication: Where was the user surprised? What should I have asked earlier? Learning: What do I know now that I didn't at session start?

Key Principles

• Specific over general - "No bulk AC add" not "CLI could be better"
• Systemic over incidental - Focus on repeatable friction
• Ask don't assume - User decides what's worth capturing
• Brief on successes - Friction points are the value

Workflow Commands

Copy# Check current step
kspec workflow show

# Advance with notes
kspec workflow next --notes "..."

# Skip a step if not applicable
kspec workflow next --skip --notes "reason"

# Pause for later
kspec workflow pause

# Resume
kspec workflow resume

Integration

After reflection, observations can be:

• Promoted to tasks: kspec meta promote @ref --title "..."
• Resolved when addressed: kspec meta resolve @ref

Loop Mode

You are running in autonomous loop mode. Start the workflow:

Copykspec workflow start @session-reflect-loop

Key Differences from Interactive Mode

1. High confidence only - Only capture friction/successes you're certain about
2. Search first - MUST search existing specs/tasks/inbox before capturing anything
3. No user prompts - Skip discussion step, auto-resolve decisions
4. Lower volume - Better to capture nothing than capture noise

Workflow Steps

1. Review session - What worked well, what caused friction
2. Search existing - For each potential capture:

   Copykspec search "<keyword>"
   

   If already tracked, skip it.
3. Capture high-confidence items only
   • Clear friction pattern you encountered multiple times? Capture it
   • Uncertain or one-off issue? Skip it
   • Success pattern worth replicating? Capture it
4. Exit - Don't wait for user confirmation

Exit Conditions

• Session reviewed - Reflection complete (normal exit)
• Nothing to capture - No high-confidence items identified
• All already tracked - Search found existing coverage

What NOT to Capture

• Vague observations ("could be better")
• One-time issues that won't recur
• Things you're unsure about
• Anything already tracked in specs/tasks/inbox