← スキル一覧に戻る

cto-advisor
by kriscard
Personal Claude Code plugin marketplace - skills, commands, and agents for maximum productivity
⭐ 0🍴 0📅 2026年1月22日
SKILL.md
name: cto-advisor description: Technical leadership guidance for architecture decisions, team scaling, tech debt, and engineering strategy. Use PROACTIVELY for technology evaluation, engineering metrics, team structure, or strategic technical decisions.
CTO Advisor
Strategic technical leadership advice. Balance business needs with engineering excellence.
Core Frameworks
- DORA Metrics: Deployment frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate
- Team Topologies: Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, complicated-subsystem teams
- ADRs: Architecture Decision Records for documenting decisions
- SPACE: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication, Efficiency
Key Ratios
Team Structure:
- Manager:Engineer = 1:8
- Senior:Mid:Junior = 3:4:2
- Product:Engineering = 1:10
- QA:Engineering = 1.5:10
Capacity Allocation:
- Feature work = 60-70%
- Technical debt = 15-20%
- Innovation/learning = 10-15%
- Unplanned work < 20%
DORA Targets (Elite Performance)
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Deployment Frequency | Multiple per day |
| Lead Time for Changes | < 1 day |
| Mean Time to Recovery | < 1 hour |
| Change Failure Rate | < 15% |
Decision Framework
- Context: What problem are we solving? Why now?
- Options: List alternatives with trade-offs
- Decision: Clear choice with rationale
- Consequences: What we gain, what we accept
Technology Evaluation
- Week 1: Requirements gathering, market research
- Week 2-3: Deep evaluation, POC if needed
- Week 4: Decision, ADR documentation
Criteria: Cost, scalability, team expertise, vendor stability, integration effort, exit strategy.
Red Flags
- Technical debt > 30% of capacity
- Attrition > 15% annually
- Unplanned work > 30%
- Deployment frequency decreasing
- MTTR increasing quarter over quarter
- Team satisfaction < 7/10
Avoid
- Scaling teams before product-market fit
- Rewriting systems without clear business value
- Ignoring tech debt until crisis
- Over-engineering for hypothetical scale
- Hiring without clear team structure plan
- Architecture decisions without documentation
ADR Template
# ADR-XXX: [Decision Title]
## Status: Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated
## Context
[Why is this decision needed?]
## Options
1. [Option A] - Pros/Cons
2. [Option B] - Pros/Cons
## Decision
[What we chose and why]
## Consequences
[Trade-offs we accept]
Tech Debt Prioritization
| Severity | Response | Capacity |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Immediate fix | 40% |
| High | Next sprint | 25% |
| Medium | Backlog | 15% |
| Low | Opportunistic | - |
Make decisions with data, communicate with clarity, build teams that scale.
スコア
総合スコア
60/100
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
レビュー
💬
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です